Constructing Hegemony in Global Politics. A Discourse–Theoretical Approach to Policy Analysis

REFERENCES

• Aglietta, M. (2012). The European Vortex. New Left Review, May/June, 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bertramsen, R. B. (1991). From the capitalist state to political economy. In R. B. Bertramsen, J. P. F. Thomsen, & J. Torfing (Eds.), State, economy and society (pp. 94–145). London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U. (2013). State, context and correspondence. Contours of a historical-materialist policy analysis. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 42(4), 425–442.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2000). Restaging the universal: Hegemony and the limits of formalism. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality (pp. 11–43). London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., Waever, O., & Wilde, J. D. (1998). Security. A new framework for analysis. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The ''Mystical Foundation of Authority''. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B. (2015). Hall of mirrors: The great depression, the great recession, and the uses-and misuses-of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Memo: Austerity and growth debate, Brussels, 23 April. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-368_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2011). Conclusions 24/25 March 2011, EUCO 10/1/11 REV 1. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/120296.pdf, accessed 20 August 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament/EU Council. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 on the strengthening of economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States in the euro area experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2013:140:FULL&from=EN, accessed 15 August 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2015). Unemployment statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics, accessed 5 January 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2012). ECB ‘ready to do whatever it takes’, in: FT.com, from 26 July. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6ce6b2c2-d713-11e1-8e7d-00144feabdc0.html, accessed 4 February (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2015). Greece closes banks after bailout talks break down, in: FT.com. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/49775bac-1d83-11e5-ab0f-6bb9974f25d0.html#slide0, accessed 15 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2016a). Christine Lagarde wants softer, kinder IMF to face populist anger, in: FT.com, from 13 July. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0fc06c9e-4877-11e6-8d68-72e9211e86ab.html#axzz4ETZstv9n, accessed 15 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2016c). Portugal agrees ‘Plan B’ deficit cuts, in: FT.com, from 4 February (2016). http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/bcfbc34c-cb39-11e5-a8ef-ea66e967dd44.html#axzz40SnatSdh, accessed 6 February.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2016d). Brussels set to fine Spain and Portugal for deficit breaches, in: FT.com, from 5 July. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/568ad062-42cb-11e6-b22f-79eb4891c97d.html#axzz4EUSiuvvd, accessed 15 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2016b). Times Portugal’s anti-austerity budget provokes Brussels showdown, in: FT.com, from 4 February, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/bcfbc34c-cb39-11e5-a8ef-ea66e967dd44.html, accessed 12 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of critical policy studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Gottweiss, H. (Ed.). (2012). The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J. (2009). Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review paper. Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Essex, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/796/1/discourse_analysis_NCRM_014.pdf, accessed 12 October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. R. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., Klimecki, R., & Willmott, H. (2015). Logics in policy and practice: A critical nodal analysis of the UK banking reform process. Critical Policy Studies, 9 (4), 393–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrance & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, S., & Howarth, D. (2006). Metaphor, catachresis and equivalence: The rhetoric of freedom to fly in the struggle over aviation policy in the United Kingdom. Policy and Society, 25(2), 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In M. Van den Brink & T. Metze (Eds.), Words matter in policy and planning: Discourse theory and method in the social sciences. Utrecht: Grafimedia.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7 (3), 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis. A critical introduction. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2010). Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3-4), 309–335.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2012). Poststructuralist policy analysis: Discourse, hegemony, and critical explanation. In F. Fischer & H. Gottweiss (Eds.), The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice (pp. 305–342). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In D. Howarth, Y. Stavrakakis, & A. J. Norval (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis (pp. 1–23). Manchester: MUP.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., Norval, A. J., & Stavrakakis, Y. (Ed.). (2000). Discourse theory and political analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: MUP.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. (2010). Greece: Request for stand-by arrangement, IMF country Report No.10/111. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund Publication Services.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2010). Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3-4), 336–356.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., & Sum, N. (2006). Beyond the regulation approach. Putting capitalist economies in their place. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (2013). How the case of austerity has crumbled, in: The New York Review of Books, from 5 August. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/jun/06/how-case-austerity-has-crumbled/?pagination=false, accessed 4 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kutter, A. (2014). A catalytic moment: The Greek crisis in the German financial press. Discourse & Society, 25(4), 446–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (Ed.). (1990a). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1990b). New reflections on the revolution of our time. In E. Laclau (Ed.), New reflections on the revolution of our time (pp. 3–88). London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1996a). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1999). Hegemony and the future of democracy: Ernesto Laclau's political philosophy, Interview. In G. A. Olson & L. Worsham (Ed.), Race, rhetoric, and the postcolonial (pp. 129–164). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2000a). Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality (pp. 44–89). London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2000b). Structure, history and the political. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality (pp. 182–212). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2000c). Constructing universality. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality (pp. 281–307). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1990). Post-Marxism without apologies. In E. Laclau (Ed.), New reflections on the revolutions of our time (pp. 97–134). London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Preface to second edition to hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London/New York: Verso, 2. edition.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Zac, L. (1994). Minding the gap: The subject of politics. In E. Laclau (Ed.), The making of political identities (pp. 11–39). London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1996b). Subject of politics, politics of the subject. In E. Laclau (Ed.), Emancipation(s) (pp. 47–65). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnkopf, B. (2012). The euro crisis: German politics of blame and austerity – A neoliberal nightmare. International Critical Thought, 2(4), 472–485.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, A. J. (2007). Aversive democracy inheritance and originality in the democratic tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, C. (2011). Reproducing hegemony: US finance capital and the 2008 crisis. Critical Policy Studies, 5(3), 219–247.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, C. (2014). Neoliberalism's resilience: A matter of class. Critical Policy Studies, 8(3), 348–351.
   Google Scholar
• Schirrmacher, F. (2001). Die Darwin AG: Wie Nanotechnologie, Biotechnologie und Computer den neuen Menschen träumen. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 106–126.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2015). Discursive institutionalism: Understanding policy in context. In F. Fischer (Ed.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 171–189). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Beyond paradigms. Analytical eclecticism in the study of world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak. In L. Grossberg & C. Nelson (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Chicago: Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. (2014). ‘We're reaping what we sowed’: Everyday crisis narratives and acquiescence to the age of austerity. New Political Economy, 19(6), 895–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. (2007). The Lacanian left. Psychoanalysis, theory, politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142.
   Google Scholar
• Stournaras, Y. (2016). Greece needs a new deal with its European partners, in: Ft.com, from 13. Juni. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f0f29e80-3166-11e6-bda0-04585c31b153.html, accessed 23. Juni 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N. (2009). The production of hegemonic policy discourses: ‘Competitiveness’ as a knowledge brand and its (re-)contextualizations. Critical Policy Studies, 3(2), 184–203.
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy. Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tsipras, A. (2015a). Address concerning the referendum to be held on the 5th of July. http://www.primeminister.gov.gr/english/2015/06/27/prime-minister-alexis-tsipras-address-concerning-the-referendum-to-be-held-on-the-5th-of-july/, accessed 2 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Tsipras, A. (2015b). Speech to Parliament regarding the July 5th referendum, 28 June. http://www.primeminister.gov.gr/english/2015/06/28/prime-minister-alexis-tsipras-speech-to-parliament-regarding-the-july-5th-referendum/, accessed 2 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wullweber, J. (2015). Global politics and empty signifiers: The political construction of high-technology. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 78–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, B., & Semmler, W. (2011). The European sovereign debt crisis: Is Germany to blame? German. German Politics and Society, 29(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar