Toward a Care-Centered Approach for Nonprofit Management in a Neoliberal Era

REFERENCES

• Alexander, J., Nank, R., & Stivers, C. (1999). Implications of welfare reform: Do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 452–475. doi:10.1177/0899764099284005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman, E. V., & Smith, S. R. (2000). Healthy organizations, unhealthy communities? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(4), 355–373. doi:10.1002/nml.10402
   Google Scholar
• Balanoff, E. (2013). A special, set-apart place no longer? Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35(1), 11–27. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806350102
   Google Scholar
• Barsade, S. G., & O’Neill, O. A. (2014). What’s love got to do with it? A longitudinal study of the culture of companionate love and employee and client outcomes in a long-term care setting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 551–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, L. (2012). When care trumps justice: The operationalization of Black feminist caring in educational leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(1), 3–87.
   Google Scholar
• Billis, D., & Glennerster, H. (1998). Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage. Journal of Social Policy, 27(1), 79–98. doi:10.1017/S0047279497005175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackemore, J. (1999). Troubling women feminism, leadership and educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowdon, M. A., & Scott, J. B. (2003). Service-learning in technical and professional communication. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bowdon, M., Pigg, S., & Mansfield, L. P. (2014). Feminine and feminist ethics and service-learning site selection: The role of empathy. Feminist Teacher, 24(1), 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, N., & Gessner, B. (2013). Human resource performance metrics: Methods and processes that demonstrate you care. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 20(2), 251–273. doi:10.1108/13527601311313508
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, L. A., & Siplon, P. D. (2004). Toward nonprofit organization reform in the voluntary spirit: Lessons from the internet. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 435–457. doi:10.1177/0899764004266021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. (2003). Other voices/other rooms: Towards a care-centered public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 25(4), 529–544. doi:10.1080/10841806.2003.11029423
   Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. (2009). Markets no more: Toward a care-centered public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 31(3), 396–402. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806310308
   Google Scholar
• Bush, R. (1992). Survival of the nonprofit spirit in a for-profit world. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(4), 391–410. doi:10.1177/089976409202100406
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G. (2002). Norman Denzin’s feminist communitarian ethics. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 25, 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L., & Jun, J. S. (2005). The need for reflexivity in public administration. Administration and Society, 37(2), 225–242. doi:10.1177/0095399704273209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, E. J. (2017). Reciprocity as a Foundational Concept in Teaching Philanthropic and Nonprofit Studies. Philanthropy and Education, 1(1), 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E., & Sanders, M. L. (2010). Meaningful work? Nonprofit marketization and work/life imbalance in popular autobiographies of social entrepreneurship. Organization, 17(4), 437–459. doi:10.1177/1350508410364198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. (2007). Doing the dirty work: Gender, race, and reproductive labor in historical perspective. Gender and Society, 21(3), 313–336. doi:10.1177/0891243207300764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberly, D., & Streeter, R. (2002). The soul of civil society: Voluntary associations and the public value of moral habits. Lanham, Marylandm, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M. (2009a). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596. doi:10.1177/0899764009333686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M. (2009b). Giving circles: Philanthropy, voluntary association, and democracy. Bloomington, MN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, V. (1991). Disability: an administrative challenge? The health and welfare heritage. In M. Oliver (Ed.), Social Work: Disabled People and Disabling Environments. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1965 [1918]). Power. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 95–116). New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984 [1988]). The care of the self: The history of sexuality, volume 3 (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope (RR Barr, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P., & Andre-Clark, A. (2000). When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in the nonprofit human services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_Suppl), 141–163. doi:10.1177/0899764000291S007
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1999). Social capital and civil society. Paper presentation at the IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–464. doi:10.17763/haer.72.4.0515nr62324n71p1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. (2007). The ethics of care, black women and the social professions: Implications of a new analysis. Ethics and Social Welfare, 1(2), 194–206. doi:10.1080/17496530701450372
   Google Scholar
• Grönbjerg, K. A., & Salamon, L. M. (2016). Devolution, marketization, and the changing shape of government-nonprofit relations. In J. S. Ott & L. A. Dicke (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed., pp. 129–146). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky, O. (2014). Rethinking care ethics: On the promise and potential of an intersectional analysis. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 252–264. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of the nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901. doi:10.2307/796089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkavy, I. (2006). The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(1), 5–37. doi:10.1177/1746197906060711
   Google Scholar
• Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, S. (2007). Transgendering care: Practices of care within transgendered communities. Critical Social Policy, 27(4), 464–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (2014). Teaching to transgress. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, R. P., & Stivers, C. (1998). Government isn’t us: The possibility of democratic knowledge in representative government. In C.S. King, C. Stivers, & Collaborators (Eds.), Government isn’t us: Public administration in an anti-government era (pp. 28–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, J. (1999). The need for autonomy and virtues: Civic-minded administrators in a civil society. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 21(2), 218–226. doi:10.1080/10841806.1999.11643366
   Google Scholar
• King, S. (2006). Pink ribbons, Inc. Breast cancer and the politics of philanthropy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosny, A., & MacEachen, E. (2010). Gendered, invisible work in non‐profit social service organizations: Implications for worker health and safety. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(4), 359–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman, V. (2012). Applying ethics of care to a nursing practice. Medsurg Nursing: Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 21(2), 112–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lange, S. (2013). NGOs, civil society, and the public sphere. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Care and possibility: Enacting an ethic of care through narrative practice. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 641–663. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C., & Hey, V. (2009). Gender/ed discourses and emotional sub-texts: Theorising emotion in UK higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 429–440. doi:10.1080/13562510903050194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K. M. (2005). What drives nonprofit entrepreneurship? A look at budget trends of metro Detroit social service agencies. American Review of Public Administration, 35(4), 350–362. doi:10.1177/0275074005278813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtka, J. M. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethic of care? Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 179–200. doi:10.2307/3857622
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. (2005). A caring profession? The ethics of care and social work with older people. British Journal of Social Work, 36(7), 1171–1185. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (2010). Carelessness: A hidden doxa of higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 9(1), 54–67. doi:10.1177/1474022209350104
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., Lyons, M., & Cantillon, S. (2007). Breaking silence: Educating citizens for love, care and solidarity. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(1–2), 1–19. doi:10.1080/09620210701433589
   Google Scholar
• Lyon-Callo, V. (2004). Inequality, poverty, and neoliberal governance: Activist ethnography in the homeless sheltering industry. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86. doi:10.1177/0899764014561796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabella, R. M. (2013). Toward a more perfect nonprofit: The performance mindset and the “Gift”. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35(1), 81–105. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806350106
   Google Scholar
• Molzahn, A. E. (1997). Creating caring organization cultures in dialysis units. ANNA Journal, 24(2), 247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nickel, P. M., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). A critique of the discourse of marketized philanthropy. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7), 974–989. doi:10.1177/0002764208327670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, B. (1999). Civil society: The underpinnings of American democracy. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Odenhahl, T. & O’Neill, M. (Eds.). (1994). Women and power in the nonprofit sector. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrander, S. A. (2007). The growth of donor control: Revisiting the social relations of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 356–372. doi:10.1177/0899764007300386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrander, S., & Schervish, P. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as a social relation. In Van Til J. (Ed.), Critical Issues in American Philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice (pp. 67–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, L. M., & Ennis, C. D. (2005). The ethic of care in teaching: An overview of supportive literature. Quest, 57(4), 392–425. doi:10.1080/00336297.2005.10491864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parken, A., (2010). A. multi-strand approach to promoting equality and human rights in policymaking. Policy and Policy and Politics, 38(1), 79–99. doi:10.1332/030557309X445690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2003). Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist ethics of care. British Journal of Social Work, 33(1), 1–16. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen, T. (2011). The ethics of care: Normative structures and empirical implications. Health Care Analysis: Hca: Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy, 19(1), 51–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A., & Kelleher, D. (2000). Leadership for social transformation: Some ideas and questions on institutions and feminist leadership. Gender and Development, 8(3), 74–79. doi:10.1080/741923786
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roelofs, J. (2007). Foundations and collaboration. Critical Sociology, 33(3), 479–504. doi:10.1163/156916307X188997
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2001). What is the nonprofit sector and why do we have it? In J.S. Ott (Ed.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 162–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, B. (2013). The road to market. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35(1), 28–45. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806350103
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, B. (2016). Against the cult(ure) of the entrepreneur for the nonprofit sector. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 38(1), 52–67. doi:10.1080/10841806.2015.1130524
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (2013). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, H. L. (2008). Feminist theory and the political dimension of performance measurement: A preliminary analysis. Public Performance and Management, 32(2), 263–274. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576320204
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, G. (2010). Democratizing the classroom: Sequencing discussions and assignments to promote student ownership of the course. Review of Radical Political Economics, 42(1), 101–107. doi:10.1177/0486613409357185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scranton, A. M., & Ranney, M. J. (2012). Gender differences in administrative ethics. In T. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics (2nd ed., pp. 555–580). New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of Care: Feminist considerations on Justice, Morality, and Politics. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M., & Cheney, G. (2007). Marketization, participation, and communication within New Zealand retirement villages: A critical-rhetorical and discursive analysis. Discourse and Communication, 1(2), 191–222. doi:10.1177/1750481307076006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stensota, H. (2010). The conditions of care: Reframing the debate about public sector ethics. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2000, March 13). Why we need a care movement. The Nation. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/article/why-we-need-care-movement.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M. (2010). Back to the future: Toward. a Political Economy of Love and Abundance. Administration and Society, 42(1), 3–37. doi:10.1177/0095399710363681
   Google Scholar
• Tate, W. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. In M. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 195–247). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi:10.3102/0091732X022001195
   Google Scholar
• Themudo, N. (2009). Gender and the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 663–683. doi:10.1177/0899764009333957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (2011). A feminist democratic ethics of care and global care workers. In Mahon, R. and Robinson, F. (Eds.). Feminist ethics and social policy: towards a new global political economy of care (pp. 162–177). Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. (2000). What’s love got to do with it? A critical look at American charity. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (2002). Equality and civil society. In S. Chambers & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Alternative conceptions of civil society (pp. 34–49). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2004). What is the political role of nonprofits in democracy? In P. Frumkin, & J. B. Imber (Eds.), In search of the nonprofit sector (pp. 37–47). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality, and economic theory (pp. 171–195). New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond new labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467–493. doi:10.1177/026101830102100405
   Google Scholar
• Wirgau, J. S., Farley, K. W., & Jensen, C. (2010). Is business discourse colonizing philanthropy? A critical discourse analysis of (product) red. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(4), 611–630. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9122-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. (1991). Care of disabled people. In G. Dalley (Ed.). Disability and social policy (pp. 199–202). London, UK: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Woolford, A., & Curran, A. (2011). Neoliberal restructuring, limited autonomy, and relational distance in Manitoba’s nonprofit field. Critical Social Policy, 31(4), 583–606. doi:10.1177/0261018311415571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2012). Pedagogies of strategic empathy: Navigating through the emotional complexities of anti-racism in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(2), 113–125. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.611869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar