Queering Police Administration: How Policing Administration Complicates LGBTIQ–Police Relations

REFERENCES

• Ault, A. (1996). The dilemma of identity: Bi women’s negotiations. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 311–329). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., & Dwyer, A. (2017). Queer criminology and the global south: Setting queer and southern criminologies into dialogue. In K. Carrington, R. Hogg, J. Scott, & M. Sozzo (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of criminology and the global south (pp. 121–138). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bertone, C., & Gusmano, B. (2013). Queerying the public administration in Italy: Local challenges to a national standstill. In Y. Taylor & M. Addison (Eds.), Queer presences and absences (pp. 260–278). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blessett, B., Gaynor, T. S., Witt, M., & Alkadry, M. G. (2016). Counternarratives as critical perspectives in public administration curricula. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(4), 267–284. doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1239397
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. (2009). Shared perceptions among lesbian and gay police officers: Barriers and opportunities in the law enforcement work environment. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 86–101. doi:10.1177/1098611108327308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. (2012b). Improved policing in an invisible community: A case study of the gay and lesbian liaison unit of Washington, DC. In R. Schwester (ed.), Handbook of critical incident analysis (pp. 303–315). Armonk, New York: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. A. (2004). Agenda setting, innovation, and state gay rights policy: An event history analysis. American Review of Politics, 25(Fall), 241–263. doi:10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2004.25.0.241-263
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. A. (2010). Critical incidents, invisible populations, and public policy: A case of the LGBT community. Journal of Critical Incident Analysis, 1(1), 30–40. Retrieved from http://jcia.aciajj.org/volume-1-no-1/critical-incidents-invisible-populations-and-public-policy-a-case-of-the-lgbt-community/
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. A. (2012a). Gay and lesbian cops: Diversity and effective policing. London, UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, G. D. (1991). Violence against lesbians and gay men. New York, US: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, N. (2016, June 23). London’s Metropolitan Police to launch LGBT staff network. Pink News. Retrieved from https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/06/23/londons-metropolitan-police-to-launch-lgbt-staff-network/
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, A. (2011). “It’s not like we’re going to jump them”: How transgressing heteronormativity shapes police interactions with LGBT young people. Youth Justice, 11(3), 203–219. doi:10.1177/1473225411420526
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, A. (2012). Policing visible sexual/gender diversity as a program of governance. International Journal of Crime and Justice, 1(1), 14–26. Retrieved from https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/65
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, A., & Ball, M. (2013). GLBTI police liaison services: A critical analysis of existing literature. Paper presented at the Proceedings of The Australian and New Zealand Critical Criminology Conference (pp. 11–18), 2012, Hobart, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.utas.edu.au/tiles/publications_and_reports/conference_proceedings/The%206th%20Annual%20Australian%20and%20New%20Zealand%20Critical%20Criminology%20Conference%20Proceedings%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, A., Ball, M., Bond, C., Lee, M., & Crofts, T. (2017). Reporting Victimisation to LGBTI (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex) Police Liaison Services: A mixed methods study across three Australian states (Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council Grant: CRG 31/11-12). Australia: Criminology Research Advisory Council. Retrieved from http://crg.aic.gov.au/reports/1718/31-1112-FinalReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flanigan, S. T. (2013). Bureaucratic discretion and same-sex couples: Considering administrative advocacy as an activism strategy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(3), 448–456. doi:10.1080/10841806.2013.11029932
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S., & Dwyer, A. (2011). Queer cops in Queensland: Exploring LGBT narrative histories in the Queensland Police Service. In B. Scherer & M. Ball (Eds.), Queering paradigms II: Interrogating agendas (pp. 277–293). Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelstein, K. E. W., & Bruckner, H. (2011). Criminal justice and school sanctions against non-heterosexual youth: A national longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127(1), 49–57. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2003). Sexuality, heterosexuality and gender hierarchy: Some reflections on recent debates. In J. Weeks, J. Holland & M. Waites (Eds.), Sexualities and society: A reader (pp. 69–83). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2015). Who forgot lesbian, gay, and bisexual police officers? Findings from a national survey. Policing, 9(1), 65–76. doi:10.1093/police/pau061
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2012). Social equities and inequities in practice: Street-level workers as agents and pragmatists. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S16–S23. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. I. (1997). The anatomy of disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, L., & Skeggs, B. (2004). Sexuality and the politics of violence and safety. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Panter, H. (2017). Transgender cops: The Intersection of gender and sexuality expectations in police cultures. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, P. M. (2001). Viscera, emotion, and administration: The lessons of ‘embodied’ disgust. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 23(2), 205–230. doi:10.1080/10841806.2001.11643512
   Google Scholar
• Reissman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, B. A. (2016). Heteronormativity and homonormativity. In N. Naples (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1–3). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (1999). Matter out of place: Visibility and sexualities in leisure spaces. Leisure Studies, 18(3), 213–232. doi:10.1080/026143699374934
   Google Scholar
• Stanisevski, D. (2013). Introduction to the forum. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(3), 438–440.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. (2008). Madness to the method? Using a narrative methodology to analyse large-scale complex social phenomena. Qualitative Research, 8(3), 435–447. doi:10.1177/1468794106093639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomsen, S. (2009). Violence, prejudice and sexuality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100–110. doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100
   Google Scholar
• Valcore, J. (2017). Sexual orientation in state hate crime laws: Exploring social construction and criminal law. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(12), 1607–1630. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1380992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. L., & Robinson, A. L. (2004). Problems and prospects with policing the lesbian, gay and bisexual community in Wales. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 14(3), 213–232. doi:10.1080/1043946042000241811
   Google Scholar