Toward a Critical Theory of Collaborative Governance

REFERENCES

• Allen, A. (2016). The end of progress: Decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher, D. E. (2004). Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National Civic Review, 93(4), 32–46. doi:10.1002/ncr.69
   Google Scholar
• Bramwell, A. (2015). Who speaks for Toronto? Collaborative governance in the civic action alliance. In K. Emerson & T. Nabatachi (Eds.), Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnside-Lawry, J., & Carvalho, L. (2015). Building local level engagement in disaster risk reduction: a Portugese case study. Disaster Prevention and Management, 24(1), 80–99. doi:10.1108/DPM-07-2014-0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. doi:10.1111/puar.12347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2012). Collaborative governacne: Private roles for public goals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Murchie, P. (2010). Collaborative governance and climate change: Opportunities for public administration. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferragina, E., & Arrigoni, A. (2017). The rise and fall of social capital: Requiem for a theory? Political Studies Review, 15(3), 355–367. doi:10.1177/1478929915623968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Torgerson, D., Durnova, A., & Orsini, M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of critical policy studies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In A. Philip & T.-J. Mark (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1985). Critical theory and planning practice. In J. Forester (Ed.), Critical theory and public life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5–41. doi:10.1177/0032329201029001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2000). Is face-to-face deliberation a luxury or a necessity? Political Communication, 17(4), 357–361. doi:10.1080/10584600050178960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth, H. H., & Wright Mills, C. (Eds.). (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1974). What does a crisis mean today? Legitimation Problems in Late Capitalism. Social Research. 40(4), 643–667.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1991). The philosophical discourses of modernity. (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2001). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. (C. Cronin and P. D. Greiff, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, C. S., & Paris, T. V. (2010). Preparing MPA students to succeed in governmnet-nonprofit collaborations: Lessons from the field. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(1), 13–30. doi:10.1080/15236803.2010.12001581
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2009). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In A. H. Maarten & W. Hendrik (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in networked society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration in the twenty-first century. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2010). Collaborative leadership and local governance. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, C. C. (2013). Distorted communication in the Florida everglades: A critical theory analysis of “Everglades Restoration”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(2), 269–284. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.775795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, C. C. (2016). Unearthing steering activities in everglades policy development: A Habermas critical theory analysis. Critical Issues in Justice and Politics, 9(1), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Leighninger, M. (2010). Teaching democracy in public administration: Trends and future prospects. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukensmeyer, C. J. (2013). Bringing citizen voices to the table: A guide for public managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., Brudney, J. L., & Gazley, B. (2010). The ‘new emergency management’: Applying the lessons of collaborative governance in twenty-first century emergency planning. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., Agranoff, R., & Silvia, C. (2011). Putting the ‘public’ back into collaborative public management. Paper presented at the Public Management Research Conference, Syracuse, NY.
   Google Scholar
• McIvor, D.W., & Hale, J. (2015) Urban Agriculture and the prospects for deep democracy. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(4), 727–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–379. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273
   Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S. (2007). “Developing public leaders in an age of collaborative governance.” Leading the future of the public sector: The third transatlantic dialogue. University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S., & Stephens, J. B. (2012). Teaching collaborative governance: Phases, competencies, and case-based learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 565–584. doi:10.1080/15236803.2012.12001700
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2010). Why public administration should take deliberative democracy seriously. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds.). (2009). The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., Van Slyke, D. M., & Kim, S. (Eds.). (2010).The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Plume Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, T. A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2010). Collaborative governance and cross-boundary information sharing: Envisioning a networked and IT-enabled public administration. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, L. B. (1969). Maximum feasible participation: The origins, implications, and present status. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 385(1), 14–29. doi:10.1177/000271626938500103
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. (2000). How to Democratize the European UnionyAnd Why Bother?, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. (Ed.). (1989). Jürgen Habermas on society and politics: A reader. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sirianni, C. (2009). Investing in democracy: Engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. (2017). On tyranny: Twenty lessons from the twentieth century. New York, NY: Tim Duggan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, T. (2012). Politics without vision: Thinking without a banister in the twentieth century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus Face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C. (2010). When should the public be involved in public management? Design principles with case applications. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, L. H. (2003). Deliberative democracy: A survey of the field. Washington, DC: AmericaSpeaks.
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar