545
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Weaponizing traditions: Threads of resistance and oppression

&

References

  • Adams, G., & Balfour, D. (2014). Unmasking administrative evil (4th ed., p. xx). London; New York: Routledge.
  • Alkadry, M., & Blessett, B. (2010). Aloofness or dirty hands?: Administrative culpability in the making of the second Ghetto. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(4), 532–556.
  • Anderson, W. (2002). Postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32(5–6), 643–658.
  • Antonakis, J., & Day, D. (Eds.). (2018). The nature of leadership (3rd ed.). Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore; Washington DC; Melbourne: Sage.
  • Bordas, J. (2012). Salsa, soul, and spirit: Leadership for a multicultural age. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Boyd, N. (2010). Oppression in the mundane of management: An example from human resources. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(3), 445–449.
  • Breen, A., Dupré, L., & Wilson, S. (Eds.). (2019). Research and reconciliation. Toronto, Ontario Canada: Canadian Scholars.
  • Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light Publishers.
  • Chilisa, B., Cram, F., & Mertens, D. (Eds.). (2016).  Indigenous pathways into social research: Voices of a new generation. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Cho, J., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19 (64), 1–20.
  • Chowdhry, G., & Nair, S. (Eds.). (2002). Power, postcolonialism, and international relations. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Deloria, V., Jr. (1969). Custer Died for your Sins; an Indian Manifesto. New York: Avon.
  • Downes, L.M. (n.d). The power of social structure: Lessons from the feminist theoretical perspective regarding the power of social structure to limit or increase our life chances. Retrieved from http://www.polk.edu/INSTRUCT/ALSS/Lilli/syg2000/content/Lectures/lecturelessonsfromfeminist.htm.
  • Dryzek, J. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and Political Science. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2015). An indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Heil, G., Bennis, W., & Stephens, D. (2000). Douglas McGregor revisited: Managing the human side of the enterprise. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Jolivette (2016). Indian blood: HIV and colonial trauma in San Francisco’s two-spirit community (Indigenous confluences). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Kasdan, D. (2011). A neopragmatist approach to administrative authority: Using Rorty’s liberalism for social progress. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31(4), 566–584.
  • Kenny, C., & Ngaroimata Fraser, T. (Eds.). (2012). Living Indigenous leadership: Native narratives on building strong communities. Vancouver, British Columbia Canada: UBC Press.
  • King, T. (2013). The Inconvenient Indian A Curious Account of Native People in North America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, Ontario Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Kovach, M. (2010). Conversational method in indigenous research. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 5(1), 40–48.
  • LaFrance, J., Nichols, R., & Kirkhart, K. E. (2012). Culture writes the script: On the centrality of context in indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(135), 59–74. doi:10.1002/ev.20027
  • Lajimodiere, D. (2011). Ogimah Ikwe: Native women and their path to leadership. Wicazo Sa Review, 26(2), 57–82. doi:10.1353/wic.2011.0011
  • Little Bear, L. (2000). Jagged worldviews colliding. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision. Vancouver, British Columbia Canada: UBC Press.
  • McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of the Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
  • McClintock, A. (1992). The angel of progress: Pitfalls of the term ‘post-colonialism’. Social Text, 31(32), 84–98.
  • Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Rollins, A., & Grooms, W. (2019). Public administrator practice as recognition: A philosophical case for public sector cultural competence. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41, 110–128.
  • Rubin, Z. (Ed.). (1974). Doing unto others: Joining, molding, conforming, helping, loving. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Samanta, A. (2018). Exploring the “in-between” place: Dialogue, hermeneutics, and transformation in governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40, 227–249.
  • Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession (OCAP) or self- determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary first nations research and some options for first nations communities. First Nations Centre National Aboriginal Health Organization.
  • Sharpe, D., & Mir, R. (2009). Control as Colonialism: Workplace democracy and the transfer of managerial practices within multinational corporations. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(1), 27–48. doi:10.2190/WR.14.1.c
  • Silbey, S. (1997). Let them eat cake’: Globalization, postmodern colonialism, and the possibilities of justice. Law & Society Review, 31(2), 207–236.
  • Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London; New York: Zed Books Ltd.
  • Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2016). Indigenous knowledge, methodology and mayhem: What is the role of methodology in producing indigenous insights? Knowledge Cultures, 4(3), 131–156.
  • Vizenor, G. R. (2008). Manifest Manners: Narratives on Postindian Survivance. Lincoln, Neb.: Univ. of Nebraska Press.
  • Wilson, S. (2009). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax; Winnipeg Canada: Fernwood Publishing Co.
  • Zingale, N., & Piccorelli, J. (2012). Chains of freedom: A view from Erich Fromm on individuality within organizations. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34(2), 211–236.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.