When we can’t handle the truth: Occupy, “dangerous speech,” and public administration

References

• A Bunch of Trans Women Occupiers. (2012). OWN must resist cis-supremacy and trans-misogyny. In A. S. Lang & D. Lang/Levitsky (Eds.), Dreaming in public: The building of the Occupy movement (pp. 129–132). New York: New Internationalist.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1994). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. (2013). The fragility of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neo-liberal society (G. Elliott, Trans.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. J. F. (2005). Gramsci is dead: Anarchist currents in the newest social movements. New York: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, B. (Ed.) (2007). Democratizing democracy: Beyond the liberal democratic canon. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B. (1981). In the shadow of organization. Lawrence: The Regents Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Eagan, J. L. (2014). Witholding the red ink: Occupy, Foucault, and the administration of bodies. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 36(2), 240–258. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806360205
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elías, M. V. (2016). Life in state of fear: The Secret in Their Eyes and the re-creation of a shared world. Administration & Society, 48(7), 811–830. doi:10.1177/0095399713509243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J. (2003). Because my master bathes me. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25(2), 205–232. doi:10.1080/10841806.2003.11029402
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J. (2005). To kill the king: Post-traditional governance and bureaucracy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J., & Patterson, P. M. (2003). The reflective practitioner and the uses of rhetoric. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 105–111. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1965/1988). Madness and civilization (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1966/1970). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975/1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans. 2nd ed.). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1976/1978). The history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech. New York: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008/2011). The courage of truth (the government of self and others, II): Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–1984 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave MacMillian. (Original work published 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. doi:10.1017/S1537592714001595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, S. K. (2012). The kitchens, food, and cooks of the Occupy movement. Retrieved from http://www.thekitchn.com/the-kitchens-food-cooks-of-the-occupy-movement-165046.
   Google Scholar
• Happe, K. E. (2015). Parrhesia, biopolitics, and Occupy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 48(2), 211–223. doi:10.5325/philrhet.48.2.0211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, M. M. (2006). Public administration’s final exam: A pragmatist restructuring of the profession and the discipline. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2004). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, S. (2012). Occupy Wall Street prepares for crackdown — Will Bloomberg tear it all down? In A. S. Lang & D. Lang/Levitsky (Eds.), Dreaming in public: The building of the Occupy movement (pp. 254–259). New York: New Internationalist.
   Google Scholar
• Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the Occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication, and Society, 18(8), 872–886. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. (2012). Tactics of waste, dirt, and disgard in the Occupy movement. Social Movement Studies, 11(3-4), 393–401. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.704178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, A. (2011). Occupy Phoenix’s most devoted protestors. Retrieved from http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/occupy_phoenix_open2011/.
   Google Scholar
• Min, S.-J. (2015). Occupy Wall Street and deliberative decision-making: Translating theory to practice. Communication, Culture, & Critique, 8(1), 73–89. doi:10.1111/cccr.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupy Boston Women’s Caucus. (2012). Statement. In A. S. Lang & D. Lang/Levitsky (Eds.), Dreaming in public: The building of the Occupy movement (p. 128). New York: New Internationalist.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J., & Krinsky, J. (2012). Why does Occupy matter? Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 279–287. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.708923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlings, K. C., & Catlaw, T. (2011/2016). “Democracy as a Way of Life” rethinking the places and practices of public administration. In C. S. King (Ed.), Government is us 2.0 (pp. 31–58). New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Razsa, M., & Kurnik, A. (2012). The Occupy movement in Zizek’s hometown: Direct democracy and a politics of becoming. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 238–258. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2012). Why Occupy failed. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 754–762. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, C. (2011, January 5). Occupy Wall Street: Toilets bring relief to protestors in Zuccotti Park. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/05/occupy-wall-street-toilet_n_1077580.html. [this URL does not seem to work anymore; I attempted unsuccessfully to locate the original article, which is cited in several other places]
   Google Scholar
• Sementelli, A. (2009). Antiessentialism, parrhesia, and citizenship. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31(3), 360–376. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806310304
   Google Scholar
• Shawyer, S. (2014). Occupy Newfoundland and the Dramaturgy of Endurance. Canadian Theatre Review, 157(Winter), 7–11. doi:10.3138/ctr.157.002
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Castaneda, E., & Heyman, J. (2012). The homeless and Occupy El Paso: Creating community among the 99%. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 356–366. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.704179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Glidden, B. (2012). Occupy Pittsburgh and the challenges of participatory democracy. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 288–294. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.704182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2004). On theorizing in dark times. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(1), 19–26. doi:10.1080/10841806.2004.11029428
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2017). Integrative governance: A method for fruitful public encounters. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 130–147. doi:10.1177/0275074015576953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrek, S. (2012). ‘Why am I talking?’ Reflecting on language and privilege at Occupy Wall Street. Critical Quarterly, 54(2), 72–75. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8705.2012.02059.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., & Nicholls, W. (2012). How local networks shape a global movement: Comparing Occupy in Amsterdam and Los Angeles. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 295–301. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.704181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodovnik, Z., & Grubacic, A. (2015). “Yes, we camp!”: Democracy in the age of Occupy. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(3), 537–557. doi:10.4335/13.3.537-557(2015)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, O. F., & McSwain, C. J. (1990). The Phoenix Project: Raising a new image of public administration from the ashes of the past. In H. D. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities of public administration (pp. 23–60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yassin, J. O. (2012). Occupy Oakland: Hugs are also an option. In A. S. Lang & D. Lang/Levitsky (Eds.), Dreaming in public: The building of the Occupy movement (pp. 126–127). New York: New Internationalist.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar