Transforming power dynamics through prefigurative public administration

References

• Attrache, G. (2014). Introduction to power & prefiguration forum. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 58, 1. Retrieved from http://berkeleyjournal.org/2014/10/introduction-to-power-prefiguration-forum/.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. doi:10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartosiewicz, P., & Miley, M. (2014). The too-polite revolution: Understanding the failure to pass U.S. climate legislation. In L. Mastny (Ed.), State of the World 2014: Governing for sustainability (pp. 115–128). Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Berry-James, R. M., Blessett, B., Emas, R., McCandless, S., Nickels, A. E., Norman-Major, K., & Vinzant, P. (2021). Stepping up to the plate: Making social equity a priority in public administration’s troubled times. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 27(1), 5–15. doi:10.1080/15236803.2020.1820289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharath, D. M. N. (2021). Film in public administration classrooms: Developing responsible administrators in the Information Age. Teaching Public Administration, 39(2), 133–155. doi:10.1177/0144739420929384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, J. (1995). Solidarity and agency: Rethinking community development. Human Organization, 54(1), 60–69. doi:10.17730/humo.54.1.m459ln688536005w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessett, B., Dodge, J., Edmond, B., Goerdel, H. T., Gooden, S. T., Headley, A. M., … Williams, B. N. (2019). Social equity in public administration: A call to action. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 283–299. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz016
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. (1977). Marxism, prefigurative communism, and the problem of workers' control. Theory and Society, 4(3), 359–393. doi:10.1007/BF00206985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyte, H. C. (2005). Reframing democracy: Goverance, civic agency, and politics. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 536–546. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00481.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breines, W. (1989). Community and organization in the new Left, 1962–1968: The great refusal. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, C. (2019). Unapologetic: A Black, queer, and feminist mandate for radical movements. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age (2nd ed.). Boston: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Catlaw, T. J., & Eagan, J. L. (2022). When we can’t handle the truth: Occupy, “dangerous speech,” and public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 44(3), 234–251. doi:10.1080/10841806.2021.2020527
   Google Scholar
• Demaris, L., & Landsman, C. (2021). Relational culture: Beyond prefigurative politics. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 44(3), 186–195. doi:10.1080/10841806.2021.1945373
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, C. (2014). Another politics: Talking across today’s transformative movements. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (2003). Power. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 95–116). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1971). Toward a new public administration. In F. Marini (Ed.), Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 309–331). Scranton, OH: Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (D. Macedo, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (1982). Power and powerlessness: Quiessence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00320.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaynor, T. S., & Taliaferro, J. D. (2016). Introduction. In Teaching the wire: Frameworks, theories and strategies for the classroom (pp. 1–4). Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Geall, S., & Hilton, I. (2014). China’s environmental governance challenge. In L. Mastny (Ed.), State of the World 2014: Governing for Sustainability (pp. 129–137). Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, U. (2007). Anarchism reloaded. Journal of Political Ideologies, 12(1), 29–48. doi:10.1080/13569310601095598
   Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E., & McCandless, S. A. (2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S5–S13. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02635.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardina, D. (2006). Strategies for citizen participation and empowerment in non-profit, community-based organizations. Community Development, 37(4), 4–17. doi:10.1080/15575330609490192
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337–358. doi:10.1080/14719030000000021
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, A. (2013). Transformation now! Toward a post-oppositional politics of change. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kioupkiolis, A. (2021). Transforming city government: Italian variants on urban commoning. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 44(3), 196–214. doi:10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1950). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. New York: Peter Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Ledwith, M. (2011). Community development: A critical approach (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorde, A. (2007). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In A. Lorde (Ed.), Sister outsider: Essays and speeches (pp. 110–114). Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, J. M., & Fox, C. (2021). Social dreaming for social justice: Power and resistance in chaos walking. Public Integrity, 23(3), 296–309. doi:10.1080/10999922.2020.1782117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, J. M., & Stout, M. (2019). Are new social movements prefiguring Integrative Governance? In M. Stout (Ed.), From austerity to abundance? Creative approaches to coordinating the common good (pp. 7–34). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maekelbergh, M. (2011). Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, S. A., & Guy, M. E. (2020). The social equity imperative. In M. E. Guy & S. A. McCandless (Eds.), Achieving social equity: From problems to solutions (pp. 1–11). Irvine, CA: Melvin & Liegh Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, K., & Kelso, A. W. (2012). Television as text: The public administration of “parks and recreation”. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34(1), 143–146. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806340111
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racial Equity Institute (2021). The groundwater approach. Retrieved from https://www.racialequityinstitute.com/groundwaterapproach.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitrin, M. (Ed.) (2005). Horizontalism: Voices of popular power in Argentina. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M. (2011). Portraits of politicians, administrators, and citizens. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(4), 604–609. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806330409
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M., Bartels, K. P. R., & Love, J. M. (2018). Clarifying collaborative dynamics in governance networks. In M. Stout (Ed.), From austerity to abundance? Creative approaches to coordinating the common good. Vol 6, Series (CPIPSM) (pp. forthcoming). Bingly, UK: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M., & Keast, R. (2021). Collaboration: What does it really mean? In J. W. Meek (Ed.), Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 17–35). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2019). Integrative governance: Generating sustainable responses to global crises. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tchida, C. V., & Stout, M. (2021). Radical empowerment: Getting out of the way of self-efficacy, solidarity, and agency. Paper presented at the Community Development Society, Fargo, ND.
   Google Scholar
• Toomey, A. H. (2011). Empowerment and disempowerment in community development practice: Eight roles practitioners play. Community Development Journal, 46(2), 181–195. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsp060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trochmann, M. B., & Millesen, J. L. (2021). Transforming power with Pose: Centering love in state-sponsored services for LGBTQ youth experiencing homelessness. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 44(3), 215–233. doi:10.1080/10841806.2021.1945375
   Google Scholar
• Tugal, C. (2014). End of the leaderless revolution. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar