Theory and practice in dis-harmony? Toward a praxis ecosystem approach to the public administration and management discipline and profession

References

• Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, P. (1998). The importance of theories in healthcare. BMJ, 317(7164), 1007–1010. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7164.1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M., & Thompson, F. (2010). Back to the future: Making public administration a design science. Public Administration Review, 70, S295–S297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkowski, N., Williams, E., O’Connor, S., & Qu, H. (2018). Outlets for health care management research: An updated assessment of journal ratings. Journal of Health Administration Education, 35(1), 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bushouse, B., & Sowa, J. (2012). Producing knowledge for practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011422116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (Eds.) (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chijioke, J., Ikechukwu, A., & Aloysius, A. (2021). Understanding theory in social science research: Public administration in perspective. Teaching Public Administration, 39(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Standards in Public Life. (2021). Upholding standards in public life. London: CSPL.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2015). Dialogue across differences of position, perspective, and identity: Reflective practice in/on a student-faculty pedagogical partnership program. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, T., & Osborne, S. (2022). Unpacking value destruction in the intersection between public and private value. Public Administration, 2022, 12850. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12850
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2018). Demons, spirits and elephants: Reflection on the failure of public administration theory. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 4(1), 59–115. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.4.1.59-115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, M. (2020). Phenomenology in public administration: Bridging the theory–practice gap. Administration and Society, 52(10), 1516–1537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, I., Robson, I., & Dudau, A. (2021). Building student engagement through co-production and curriculum co-design in public administration programmes’. Teaching Public Administration, 39(3), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420968862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R., & Hundert, E. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA, 287(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.2.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Background note on open access to scientific publications and open research data (Directorate-General for Research and Innovation of the European Commission, Brussels).
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E. (2017). Exploring 30 years of UK public services management reform – The case of health care. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6–7), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L. (2021). Towards a practice-based approach to public innovation – Apollonian and Dionysian practice-approaches. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2021, njsr.3685. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.3685
   Google Scholar
• Gauch, H. (2003). Scientific method in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, D. (2009). The practice-turn in organization studies: Some conceptual and methodological clarifications. In A. G. Scherer, I. M. Kaufmann, M. Patzer (Eds.), Methoden in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9473-8_11
   Google Scholar
• George, B., Walker, R., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheradi, S. (2019). How to conduct a practice-based study. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, M. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glennon, R., Hodgkinson, I., & Knowles, J. (2019). Learning to manage public service organisations better: A scenario for teaching public administration. Teaching Public Administration, 37(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739418798148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems. Technovation, 2020, 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098)
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Asmus, J., Olsen, L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioural public administration. Public Administration Review, 2017, 12609. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., Parker, L., Dumay, J., & Milne, M. (2019). What counts for quality in interdisciplinary accounting research in the next decade: A critical review and reflection. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, M., & Mastracci, S. (2018). Making the affective turn: The importance of feelings in theory, praxis, and citizenship. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1485455
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, M. (1989). The Simon/Waldo debate. Public Administration Quarterly, 12, 4), 437–451.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2011). Interpreting interpretivism, interpreting interpretations: The new hermeneutics of public administration. Public Administration, 89(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01907.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. (2010). Public management research: Towards relevance. Public Management Review, 12(5), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719031003633987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, B. (1995). A theory for practice: Architecture in three discourses. Cambridge, Mass.: NMIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Hibbert, P. (2011). Use matters … and matters of use’. Building theory for reflective practice. Public Management Review, 13(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Manville, C., & Chataway, J. (2017). Learning from the UK’s research impact exercise. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 722–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9608-6
   Google Scholar
• Jun, J. (1994). On administrative praxis. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 16(2), 201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Kernaghan, K. (2009). Speaking truth to academics: The wisdom of the practitioners. Canadian Public Administration, 52(4), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, T., Six, F., Stenvall, J., & Memon, A. (2022). Governance-as-legitimacy: Are ecosystems replacing networks? Public Management Review, 24(1), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1786149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, T., Stenvall, J., Six, F., & Memon, A. (2021). Relational leadership in collaborative governance ecosystems. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1612–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1879913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. (1984). Economics of social care. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, H., & Hodgkinson, I. (2021). Examining resilience across a service ecosystem under crisis’ Public. Management Review, 2021, 2012375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2012375
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, T., French, M., Hawkins, M., Hesselgreaves, H., & Wilson, R. (2021). Responding to complexity in public services – The human learning systems approach. Public Money & Management, 41(7), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1832738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, F. (1993). Leaders in the field: Dwight Waldo. Public Administration Review, 53(5), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/976341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, B. III (2018). Exorcising our demons. Journal of Public and Non-Profit Affairs, 4(1), 116–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S., Newman, M., & Guy, M. (2010). Emotional labor: Why and how to teach it. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2010.12001590
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. (2015). Proverbs and the evolution of public administration. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H., & Fox, C. (2007). Postmodern public administration. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2018). Strategic implementation: An illustration of theory/practice disconnect in public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 59–89.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., & Carboni, J. (2019). Assessing the past and future of public administration: Reflections from the Minnowbrook at 50 Conference. IBM Center for The Business of Government, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, F. Jr. (1996). What makes public administration a science? Or, are its "big questions" really big? Public Administration Review, 56(5), 409–415. (https://doi.org/10.2307/977039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisar, A. (2020). Practitioner as the imaginary father of public administration: A psychoanalytic critique. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 42(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1589230
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. (2021). Confronting the big challenges of our time: Making a difference during and after COVID-19. Public Management Review, 23(7), 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., Van Slyke, D., & Kim, S. (2011). The future of public administration around the world. Washington DC: Georgetown UP.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2021). Public service logic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Nasi, G., & Powell, M. (2021). Beyond co-production: Value creation and public services. Public Administration, 99(4), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Powell, M., Cui, T., & Strokosch, K. (2022). Value creation in the public service ecosystem: An integrative framework. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., & Dodge, J. (2005). Narrative inquiry and the search for connectedness: Practitioners and academics developing public administration scholarship. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, J., & Viola, E. (2021). Climate change and biodiversity governance in the Amazon. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrescu, M. (2019). From marketing to public value: Towards a theory of public service ecosystems. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1733–1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. (2005). The character and significance of management research on the public services. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2013). Context in public policy and management. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, M., Quill, B., Aglipay, G., Anderson, E., Rowitz, L., Smith, L., … Whittake, C. (2006). Demonstrating excellence in practice-based research for public health. Public Health Reports, 121(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490612100102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. (2019). The state of theory in the study of public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1526517
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. (2007). Toward an epistemology of practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(4), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.27694950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, P. (2015). Positivism: Paradigm or culture? Policy Studies, 36(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1073246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. (2021). ’Don’t exclude real practitioners with the imaginary ones: A comment on Azfar Nisar’s “Practitioner as the imaginary father of public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 44(1), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1910412
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, W., & Hutchison, K. (2017). Evidence-based medicine in theory and practice: Epistemological and normative issues. In T. Schramme, & S. Edwards (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of medicine (pp. 851–872). Dordrecht: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P., & Tuurnas, J. (2021). Conflicts fostering understanding of value co-creation and service systems transformation in complex public service systems. Public Management Review, 23(2), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1679231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, J., & McPeck, J. (1976). Theory into practice or vice versa? Comments on an educational antinomy’. Journal of Educational Thought, 10(3), 188–193.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, N., Chanthamith, B., Anusara, J., Huda, N., Amin, A., Jischen, L., & Nasrin, M. (2018). Determination of interdisciplinary relationship among political science, social sciences and public administration: Perspective of theory and practice. Discovery, 54, 273.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shand, R., Parker, S., Liddle, J., Spolander, G., Warwick, L., & Ainsworth, S. (2022). After the applause: Understanding public management and public service ethos in the fight against Covid. Public Management Review, 2022, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2026690
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. & Dean, R. (eds). (2009). Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, M. (2005). Public administration enquiry and social science in the postmodern condition: Some implications of value pluralism. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(4), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2005.11029517
   Google Scholar
• Starke, A. Jr. (2018). Pariahs no more? On the status of theory and theorists in contemporary public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40(2), 143–149. (https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1458206
   Google Scholar
• Strokosch, K., & Osborne, S. (2020). Co-experience, co-production and co-governance: An ecosystem approach to the analysis of value creation. Policy & Politics, 48(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15857337955214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suoranta, J., Aura, S., & Katainen, J. (2002). Theory, research and practice: Towards reflective relationship between theory and practice in architectural thinking. International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(1), 73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. (2014). Who are the keepers of the code? Articulating and upholding ethical standards in the field of public administration. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansley, A. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2018). Leaping into real-world relevance: An ‘abduction’ process for non-profit research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017718635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, H., Ball, L., & Cassidy, C. (2018). Research Excellence Framework (REF) impact Toolkit. London: ODI.
   Google Scholar
• Tomazevic, N., Tekavcic, M., & Peljhan, D. (2017). Towards excellence in public administration: Organisation theory-based performance management model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(5–6), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1102048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A., & Johnson, P. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Waldt, G. (2016). A unified public administration? Journal of Social Sciences, 48(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2016.11893584
   Google Scholar
• Van der Waldt, G. (2017). Theory for research in public administration. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(9), 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S., Akaka, M., & Vaughan, M. (2017). Conceptualizing value: A service-ecosystem view. Journal of Creating Value, 3(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964317732861
   Google Scholar
• Vasudeva, G., Leiponen, A., & Jones, S. (2020). Dear enemy: The dynamics of conflict and cooperation in open innovation ecosystems. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000008
   Google Scholar
• Waldo, D. (1948). The study of public administration. New York: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Chandra, Y., Zhang, J., & Witteloostuijn, A. (2019). Topic modelling the research-practice gap in public administration. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 931–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Bunch, B., & Stream, S. (2013). Increasing the usefulness of academic scholarship for local government practitioners. State and Local Government Review, 45(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X13500771
   Google Scholar
• Whetsell, T., & Shields, P. (2015). The dynamics of positivism in the study of public administration: A brief intellectual history and reappraisal. Administration & Society, 47(4), 416–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713490157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittemore, A. (2015). Practitioners theorize, too: Reaffirming planning theory in a survey of practitioners’ theories. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14563144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. (2015). The science of public administration: Problems, presumptions, progress and possibilities. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti, L. (1997). Advancing praxis: Connecting critical theory with practice in public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 27(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409702700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar