The emergence of externally active representative bureaucracy, a narrative review

References

• Acasandre, A. (2020). Public participation in the decisional process in bucharest. Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty. Section: Political Sciences and European Studies, 6(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Alamoudi, A. K., Abidoye, R. B., & Lam, T. Y. M. (2022). The impact of stakeholders’ management measures on citizens’ participation level in implementing smart sustainable cities. Sustainability, 14(24), 16617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, S.-H., Song, M., & Meier, K. J. (2022). Representative bureaucracy and the policy environment: Gender representation in Forty-Four countries. Public Administration, 100(4), 900–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (2019). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, J. S., & Weingast, B. R. (1992). The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingöl, E. S. (2022). Citizen participation in smart sustainable cities. In Research anthology on citizen engagement and activism for social change (pp. 967–987). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3706-3.ch052
   Google Scholar
• Bishu, S. G., & Kennedy, A. R. (2020). Trends and gaps: A meta-review of representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19830154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bispo Júnior, J. P., & Morais, M. B. (2020). Community participation in the fight against COVID-19: Between utilitarianism and social justice. Cadernos De Saude Publica, 36(8), e00151620. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00151620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondiaux, L., & Sintomer, Y. (2009). L’Impératif Délibératif. Rue Descartes, 63(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.3917/rdes.063.0028
   Google Scholar
• Blume, G. H. (2023). “As expected”: Theoretical implications for racialized administrative power as the status quo. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borbáth, E., Hunger, S., Hutter, S., & Oana, I.-E. (2021). Civic and political engagement during the multifaceted COVID-19 crisis. Schweizerische Zeitschrift Fur Politikwissenschaft = Revue Suisse De Science Politique = Swiss Political Science Review, 27(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyte, H. C. (2004). Everyday politics: Reconnecting citizens and public life. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fj16v
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M., & Kellough, J. E. (2011). Representative bureaucracy: Assessing the evidence on active representation. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010367823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branquinho, C., Silva, S., Santos, J., Martins, I. S., Gonçalves, C., Noronha, C., Gaspar, T., & Matos, M. G. d (2022). Youth voices and social participation during a pandemic: Dream teens powered by jovem cascais. Youth, 2(4), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2040050
   Google Scholar
• Butzlaff, F. (2023). Consenting participation? How demands for citizen participation and expert-led decision-making are reconciled in local democracy. Political Studies Review, 21(2), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299221091884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candra, A. A., Nurchotimah, A. S. I., & Syaifulloh, M. T. (2022). Citizen participation in realizing gender equality in education and development. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 1(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v1i2.189
   Google Scholar
• Capers, K. J., & Smith, C. W. (2021). Race, ethnicity, and immigration: Assessing the link between passive and active representation for foreign-born clients. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Wan, P. Y. K. (2023). Interdependence between community participation and sustainable livelihood development: Community perspectives on heritage conservation in Macao. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2022.2134785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, J. (2021). Organizational participation in post-covid society – its contributions and enabling conditions. International Review of Applied Economics, 35(2), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2020.1774976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani, L. (2023). Representative bureaucracy and perceptions of social exclusion in Europe: Evidence from 27 countries. Administration & Society, 55(3), 515–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221137562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2003). Participation: The new tyranny. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00022-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking « participation » models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J, 43, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Dacombe, R., & Parvin, P. (2021). Participatory democracy in an age of inequality. Representation, 57(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1933151
   Google Scholar
• Denford, J. S., Dawson, G. S., Desouza, K. C., & Manoharan, A. P. (2022). Assessing the relevance of governmental characteristics to address wicked problems in turbulent times. Public Management Review 0:0, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2124535
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2012). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dula, L. (2022). Gendered funding: United way board composition and the funding of women- and girl-serving organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(5), 967–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211057406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, S. (2023). The polarization of climate change through time. https://hdl.handle.net/2104/12199
   Google Scholar
• Fay, D. L., Hicklin Fryar, A., Meier, K. J., & Wilkins, V. (2021). Intersectionality and equity: Dynamic bureaucratic representation in higher education. Public Administration, 99(2), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2011). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. (2023). Climbing the velvet drainpipe: Class background and career progression within the UK civil service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(4), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrini, C. J. (2021). Citizen participation in the age of contracting: When service delivery trumps democracy. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 7(3), 463–465. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.7.3.463-465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Éds.) (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. (1st ed). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., Mokre, M., & Miscoiu, S. (2021). Introduction: Democratic deliberation and under-represented groups. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920950931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, Y., & Mayka, L. (2023). Policing, democratic participation, and the reproduction of asymmetric citizenship. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooden, S. T. (2023). Diversity, social equity, and representative bureaucracy: Talk versus walk. In Public personnel management (7th éd.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goto, R., Ozone, S., Kawada, S., & Yokoya, S. (2022). Gender-related differences in social participation among japanese elderly individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 13, 21501319221111113. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319221111113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourgues, G., Mazeaud, A., & Nonjon, M. (2021). From the participatory turn of administrations to the bureaucratisation of participatory democracy: Study based on the french case. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211003122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guul, T. S. (2018). The individual-level effect of gender matching in representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and responding to complex challenges. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0
   Google Scholar
• Heinen, D., Arlati, A., & Knieling, J. (2022). Five dimensions of climate governance: A framework for empirical research based on polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog-Punzenberger, B., Fibbi, R., Vera-Larrucea, C., DeSipio, L., & Mollenkopf, J. (2012). Citizenship and participation. In M. Crul & J. Mollenkopf (Eds.), The changing face of world cities: Young adult children of immigrants in europe and the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Holum, M. (2023). Citizen participation: Linking government efforts, actual participation, and trust in local politicians. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(13), 915–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2048667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, K. (2010). The experience of home and the space of citizenship. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 48(3), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2010.00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacsó, P. (2005). Google scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29(2), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520510598066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamil, I., & Baniamin, H. M. (2020). Representative and responsive bureaucracy in Nepal: A mismatch or a realistic assumption? Public Administration and Policy, 23(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-03-2020-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. H., & Bishu, S. G. (2022). This for that: What EEOC trends reveal about representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20942811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. R., Bishu, S. G., & Heckler, N. (2020). Feminism, masculinity, and active representation: A gender analysis of representative bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 52(7), 1101–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719888470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, J. D. (1945). Representative bureaucracy: An interpretation of the british civil service. Pp. 324. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch Press, 1944. $3.50. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 239(1), 204–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624523900153
   Google Scholar
• Kirke, D. M. (2009). Social network analysis. Social Work: Theories and Methods, 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Kishimoto, K., & Kobori, H. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic drives changes in participation in citizen science project “City Nature Challenge” in Tokyo. Biological Conservation, 255, 109001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasche, B. (2023). The role of ideations in de-problematizing migration crises (and other wicked problems). Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1134457
   Google Scholar
• Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., Wodak, R., Bradby, H., Gardell, M., Kallis, A., Krzyżanowska, N., Mudde, C., & Rydgren, J. (2023). Discourses and practices of the ‘New Normal’: Towards an interdisciplinary research agenda on crisis and the normalization of anti- and post‑democratic action. Journal of Language and Politics, 22(4), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23024.krz
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., Bouckaert, G., Galli, D., Reiter, R., & Hecke, S. V. (2021). Opportunity management of the COVID-19 pandemic: Testing the crisis from a global perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852321992102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawarée, J., Jacob, S., & Ouimet, M. (2019). A scoping review of knowledge syntheses in the field of evaluation across four decades of practice. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2022). Symbolic representation, expectancy disconfirmation, and citizen complaints against police. The American Review of Public Administration, 52(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211034427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Choi, H., & Han, S. (2023). Representativeness in the eyes of the citizen: Impact of balanced citizenship on the perceived representativeness in participatory governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1993899
   Google Scholar
• Liakopoulos, D. (2023). Crisis of democratic legitimacy of the decision-making process of the Union and the role of the European Parliament. Yearbook of European Union and Comparative Law, 1(1), 80–150. https://doi.org/10.12681/yeucl.33017
   Google Scholar
• Lim, H.-H. (2006). Representative bureaucracy: Rethinking substantive effects and active representation. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00572.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, V. (2020). Participatory citizenship and crisis in contemporary Brazil. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19120-7
   Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition: The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning (vol. 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03631-6
   Google Scholar
• Maidin, A. J. (2022). Governance of SDGs: Solving the wicked problem. In Good Governance and the Sustainable Development Goals in Southeast Asia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D., & Warren, M. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Deliberative systems (pp. 1–26). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002
   Google Scholar
• Marchuk, V., Pavlova, L., Ahafonova, H., Vonsovych, S., & Simonian, A. (2021). Communication Opportunities of civil society institutions in countering the challenges of post-pandemic postmodernity. Postmodern Openings, 12(1Sup1), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/289
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Harzing, A.-W., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Can we use google scholar to identify highly-cited documents? Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrea, A. M. (2022). Coping with representation: The moderating effect of workload on individual-level representation. International Public Management Journal, 25(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2078913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. (2023). Representative bureaucracy and social equity: Bias, perceived fairness and efficacy. Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration, 1(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v1i1.4814
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 69(2), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311399851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, S. H., Norazizan, S., & Nikkhah, H. A. (2018). Conflicting perceptions on participation between citizens and members of local government. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1761–1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0565-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., Kennedy, R. P., Lazer, D. M. J., & Sokhey, A. E. (2010). Who wants to deliberate—and why? American Political Science Review, 104(3), 566–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., & Knops, A. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279403007499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noto, G., Prenestini, A., Cosenz, F., & Barresi, G. (2023). Tackling wicked problems in performance management and governance of public health: An empirical analysis of COVID-19 vaccination strategies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(2), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2022-0163
   Google Scholar
• Ohme, J., Hameleers, M., Brosius, A., & Van der Meer, T. (2021). Attenuating the crisis: The relationship between media use, prosocial political participation, and holding misinformation beliefs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1924735
   Google Scholar
• Özden, M. (2023). Active participation or legal obligation? A qualitative study of the effectiveness of participatory methods designed for local participation. Quality & Quantity 58, 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01658-z
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, M., Cilliers, J., Cimadomo, G., Montaño, F., Olufemi, O., Torres Mallma, S., & van den Berg, J. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities for Public Participation in Urban and Regional Planning during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Lessons Learned for the Future. Land, 10(12), 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720444
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711004877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, D. M. (2021). Beyond receptivity: Exploring the role of identity in educators’ orientation toward newcomers in a new immigrant destination. AERA Open, 7, 233285842110255. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211025529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogrebinschi, T. (2023). Innovating democracy?: The means and ends of citizen participation in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revesz, R. L. (2023). Broadening public participation and community engagement in the regulatory process (Executive Office of the President of the USA). White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Broadening-Public-Participation-and-Community-Engagement-in-the-Regulatory-Process.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., & Saidel, J. R. (1997). The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders: A missing piece of the representative bureaucracy puzzle. Public Administration Review, 57(5), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2006). La contre-démocratie: La politique à l’âge de la défiance. Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savas, B., & Uzun, A. (2022). Public policy: Concept and theory. In B. Parlak & K. C. Dogan, The Handbook of Public Administration, Vol. 1 (p. 103–120). Livre de Lyon, Lyon.
   Google Scholar
• Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Cohen, T. A. (2010). Abductive reasoning and similarity: Some computational tools. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Éds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 189–211). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_11
   Google Scholar
• Selden, S. C., Brudney, J. L., & Kellough, E. (2003). Bureaucracy as a representative institution: Toward a reconciliation of bureaucratic government and democratic theory. In Representative Bureaucracy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P., Klasche, B., & Nõgisto, J. (2022). Wicked problems and sociology: Building a missing bridge through processual relationalism. International Review of Sociology, 9(9), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2035909
   Google Scholar
• Simon, C. A., & Moltz, M. C. (2023). Immigrants and passive representation in the U.S. Public Service: 2000-2018. Administration & Society, 55(3), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221147239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609848
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y.-R., Agrawal, A., Matsoso, M. P., Katz, R., Davis, S. L. M., Winkler, A. S., Huber, A., Joshi, A., El-Mohandes, A., Mellado, B., Mubaira, C. A., Canlas, F. C., Asiki, G., Khosa, H., Lazarus, J. V., Choisy, M., Recamonde-Mendoza, M., Keiser, O., Okwen, P., … Yap, P. (2022). A call for citizen science in pandemic preparedness and response: Beyond data collection. BMJ Global Health, 7(6), e009389. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio, A. (2020). Designated spaces for designated imaginaries: The cruel optimism of citizen participation in post-disaster state-citizen dialogues. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 8, 9–31. http://www.dialoguestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Journal-of-Dialogue-Society-VOL-8.pdf#page=11 https://doi.org/10.55207/XDIO3809
   Google Scholar
• Vinopal, K. (2020). Socioeconomic representation: Expanding the theory of representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Voinea, C., Profiroiu, C. M., & Profiroiu, A. (2022). The public participation of civic initiative groups during the Covid-19 pandemic in romania. An exploration of public participation definitions, obstacles, and opportunities. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 15(2), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2002). What can democratic participation mean today? Political Theory, 30(5), 677–701.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 2), i233–i251. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webeck, S., & Lee, H. (2022). The behavioral foundations of representative bureaucracy. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac013
   Google Scholar
• Westphaln, K., Regoeczi, W., Masotya, M., Vazquez-Westphaln, B., Lounsbury, K., McDavid, L., Lee, H., Johnson, J., & Ronis, S. (2021). From Arksey and O’Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology. MethodsX, 8, 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, N. (2023). Public service motivation and perceptions of representative bureaucracy of people of color in human service nonprofits [M.P.A.]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2836119562/abstract/829E856B18B5496DPQ/1
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., & Lee, D. (2023). LGBTQ + officers in US federal service: An examination of workplace inclusion and experiencing sex-based discrimination. Policing and Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2023.2269290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamboni, L. M. (2020). Expanding the theoretical boundaries of active representation: Clients’ deservedness of service in the 911 emergency system. Public Administration, 98(2), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigermann, U., & Ettelt, S. (2023). Spanning the boundaries between policy, politics and science to solve wicked problems: Policy pilots, deliberation fora and policy labs. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01187-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilla, C. (2022). Defining democratic inclusion from the perspective of democracy and citizenship theory. Democratization, 29(8), 1518–1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2090929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar