Imagining Leviathan: Hobbes’s Aristotelian Notion of Fiction and the Problem of Representation

Bibliography

• Accetto, Torquato. Della dissimulazione onesta. Turin: Einaudi, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, Giorgio. Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm (Homo Sacer II, 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ankersmit, Frank. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Arp, Robert. “Re-thinking Hobbes’s Materialistic and Mechanistic Projects.” Hobbes Studies 15, no. 1 (2002): 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. “La représentation politique: Éléments pour une théorie du champ politique.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 36, no. 1 (1981): 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bredekamp, Horst. “Thomas Hobbes’s Visual Strategies.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, edited by Patricia Springborg, 29–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, Annabel. ““The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-wealth”: Thomas Hobbes and Late Renaissance Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics.” Hobbes Studies 23, no. 1 (2010): 72–102.
   Google Scholar
• Brito Vieira, Monica. The Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. “Speaking for Nature: Hobbes, Latour, and the Democratic Representation of Nonhumans.” Science & Technology Studies 31, no. 1 (2018): 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camellone, Mauro Farnesi. “Il potere della visione. Il De Homine di Hobbes tra ottica e scienza politica.” Scienza & Politica. Per una storia delle dottrine 31, no. 60 (2019): 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, Joseph. “Law, Sovereignty and Corporation Theory.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450, edited by John. H. Burns, 454–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Crignon, Philippe. “Representation and the Person of the State.” Hobbes Studies 31, no. 1 (2018): 48–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, Robin. “The Body Politic ‘is a fictitious body’.” Hobbes Studies 27, no. 2 (2014): 126–47.
   Google Scholar
• Douglass, Robin. “Authorisation and Representation before Leviathan.” Hobbes Studies 31, no. 1 (2018): 30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foisneau, Louis. “Elements of Fiction in Hobbes’s System of Philosophy.” In Fiction and the Frontiers of Knowledge in Europe, 1500–1800, edited by Richard Scholar and Alexis Tadié, 71–85. New York: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, Montserrat Lopez. Ficciones políticas: el eco de Thomas Hobbles en el ocaso de la modernidad. Madrid: Katz Editores, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog Annabel. “Hobbes and Corneille on Political Representation.” The European Legacy 14, no. 4 (2009): 379–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive). Edited by Bernard Gert. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic: Part I, Human Nature, Part II, De Corpore Politico; with Three Lives. Edited by John C.A. Gaskin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. De l’homme, De Homine. Edited by Jean Terrel. Paris: Vrin, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas, and John Bramhall. Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity. Edited by Vere Chappell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Jaume, Lucien. “La théorie de la ‘personne fictive’ dans le Léviathan de Hobbes.” Revue française de science politique 33, no. 6 (1983): 1009–35.
   Google Scholar
• Jaume, Lucien. Hobbes et l’État représentatif moderne. París: PUF, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Leijenhorst, Cees. “Jesuit Concepts of Spatium Imaginarium and Thomas Hobbes’s Doctrine of Space.” Early Science and Medicine 1, no. 3 (1996): 355–80.
   Google Scholar
• Leijenhorst, Cees. The Mechanisation of Aristotelianism: The Late Aristotelian Setting of Thomas Hobbes’ Natural Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Leijenhorst, Cees. “Sense and Nonsense about Sense: Hobbes and the Aristotelians on Sense Perception and Imagination.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, 82–108. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lemetti, Juhana. “The Most Natural and the Most Artificial: Hobbes on Imagination.” Hobbes Studies 17, no. 1 (2005): 46–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lemetti, Juhana. Imagination and Diversity in The Philosophy of Hobbes. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mulieri, Alessandro. “Marsilius of Padua on Representation.” History of Political Thought 38, no. 4 (2017): 623–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, Michael. Hobbes on Civil Association. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Olsthoorn, Johan. “Leviathan Inc.: Hobbes on the Nature and Person of the State.” History of European Ideas 47, no. 1 (2021): 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Runciman, David, “What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2000): 268–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagar, Paul. “What is the Leviathan?” Hobbes Studies 31, no. 1 (2018): 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State.” Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no. 1 (1999): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. “Hobbes on Representation.” European Journal of Philosophy 13, no. 2 (2005): 155–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorell, Tom. “Hobbes and Aristotle.” In Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, edited by Constance Blackwell and Kusukawa Sachiko, 364–79. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Springborg, Patricia. “Hobbes’s Materialism and Epicurean Mechanism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24, no. 5 (2016): 814–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, Timothy. “Hobbes and Schmitt.” History of European Ideas 37, no. 2 (2011): 160–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, Leo. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and its Genesis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Tralau, Johan. “Deception, Politics and Aesthetics: The Importance of Hobbes’s Concept of Metaphor.” Contemporary Political Theory 13, no. 2 (2014): 112–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, Richard. “Hobbes and Descartes.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, edited by G. A. John Rogers and Alan Ryan, 11–41. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Zarka, Y. Charles. Hobbes et la pensée politique moderne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2001.
   Google Scholar