Social identity and drinking: Dissecting social networks and implications for novel interventions

References

• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). Social identity and social cognition (pp. 196–229). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20 (3), 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2001). Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13 (4), 391–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta- analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64 (3), 331–341. doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsari, B., Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2006). How the quality of peer relationships influences college alcohol use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 25 (4), 361–370. doi:10.1080/09595230600741339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychologicalscience, 6 (1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46 (1), 112–130. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2014). Is there a cost to convenience? An experimental comparison of data quality in laboratory and online studies. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1 (2), 120–131. doi:10.1017/xps.2014.5
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53 (2), 189. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.53.2.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, J., Cousins, K., Samaranayaka, A., & Kypri, K. (2014). Situational and contextual factors that increase the risk of harm when students drink: Case–control and case‐crossover investigation. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33 (4), 401–411. doi:10.1111/dar.12172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delucchi, K. L., Matzger, H., & Weisner, C. (2008). Alcohol in emerging adulthood: 7-year study of problem and dependent drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 33 (1), 134–142. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2010). Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risky lottery. Judgment and Decision Making, 5 (3), 159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fondacaro, M. R., & Heller, K. (1983). Social support factors and drinking among college student males. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12 (4), 285–299. doi:10.1007/BF02088727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. M., Brown, D. L., & Boice, R. (2012). Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk website to measure accuracy of body size estimation and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 9 (4), 532–534. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26 (3), 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48 (1), 400–407. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homish, G. G., & Leonard, K. E. (2008). Spousal influence on general health behaviors in a community sample. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32 (6), 754–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14 (3), 399–425. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keough, M. T., O’Connor, R. M., Sherry, S. B., & Stewart, S. H. (2015). Context counts: Solitary drinking explains the association between depressive symptoms and alcohol-related problems in undergraduates. Addictive Behaviors, 42, 216–221. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, J. E., Devos-Comby, L., Moore, R. S., Daniel, J., & Homer, K. (2011). Collegiate natural drinking groups: Characteristics, structure, and processes. Addiction Research & Theory, 19 (4), 312–322. doi:10.3109/16066359.2010.507895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larimer, M. E., Turner, A. P., Mallett, K. A., & Geisner, I. M. (2004). Predicting drinking behavior and alcohol-related problems among fraternity and sorority members: Examining the role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18 (3), 203–212. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.3.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau-Barraco, C., & Collins, R. L. (2011). Social networks and alcohol use among nonstudent emerging adults: A preliminary study. Addictive Behaviors, 36 (1–2), 47–54. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau-Barraco, C., Braitman, A. L., Leonard, K. E., & Padilla, M. (2012). Drinking buddies and their prospective influence on alcohol outcomes: Alcohol expectancies as a mediator. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26 (4), 747–758. doi:10.1037/a0028909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau-Barraco, C., & Linden, A. N. (2014). Drinking buddies: Who are they and when do they matter? Addiction Research & Theory, 22(1), 57–67. doi:10.3109/16066359.2013.772585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, K. E., Kearns, J., & Mudar, P. (2000). Peer networks among heavy, regular and infrequent drinkers prior to marriage. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61 (5), 669–673.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, K. E., & Mudar, P. (2003). Peer and partner drinking and the transition to marriage: A longitudinal examination of selection and influence processes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17 (2), 115–125. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.17.2.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, K. E., & Mudar, P. (2004). Husbands’ influence on wives’ drinking: Testing a relationship motivation model in the early years of marriage. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18 (4), 340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, K. E., & Homish, G. G. (2008). Predictors of heavy drinking and drinking problems over the first 4 years of marriage. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22 (1), 25–35. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.22.1.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. A., & Neighbors, C. (2004). Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18 (4), 334–339. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.4.334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neighbors, C., Lee, C. M., Lewis, M. A., Fossos, N., & Larimer, M. E. (2007). Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68 (4), 556–565. doi:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neighbors, C., LaBrie, J. W., Hummer, J. F., Lewis, M. A., Lee, C. M., Desai, S., … Larimer, M. E. (2010). Group identification as a moderator of the relationship between perceived social norms and alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24 (3), 522–528. doi:10.1037/a0019944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. W. (2002). Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, 14, 164–172. doi:10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed, M. B., Lange, J. E., Ketchie, J. M., & Clapp, J. D. (2007). The relationship between social identity, normative information, and college student drinking. Social Influence, 2 (4), 269–294. doi:10.1080/15534510701476617
   Google Scholar
• Reifman, A., Watson, W. K., & McCourt, A. (2006). Social networks and college drinking: Probing processes of social influence and selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (6), 820–832. doi:10.1177/0146167206286219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L. M., Young, C. M., Tomkins, M. M., DiBello, A. M., Krieger, H., & Neighbors, C. (2016). Friends in low places: The impact of locations and companions on 21st birthday drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 52, 52–57. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social psychology of intergroup relations (pp 33–48). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, C. J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (5), 585–600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. D., Read, J. P., Palfai, T. P., & Stevenson, J. F. (2001). Social influence processes and college student drinking: The mediational role of alcohol outcome expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62 (1), 32–43. doi:10.15288/jsa.2001.62.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar