Examining Hedonic and Utilitarian Bidding Motivations in Online Auctions: Impacts of Time Pressure and Competition

REFERENCES

• Adam, M.T.P.; Krämer, J.; and Weinhardt, C. Excitement up! Price down! Measuring emotions in Dutch auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 2 (winter 2012−), 7–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, M.T.; Krämer, J.; Jähnig, C.; Seifert, S.; and Weinhardt, C. Understanding auction fever: A framework for emotional bidding. Electronic Markets, 21, 3 (2011), 197–207.
   Google Scholar
• Amyx, D.A., and Luehlfing, M.S. Winner’s curse and parallel sales channels—Online auctions linked within e-tail websites. Information & Management, 43, 8 (2006), 919–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.C., and Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (May 1988), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angst, C.M.; Agarwal, R.; and Kuruzovich, J. Bid or buy? Individual shopping traits as predictors of strategic exit in on-line auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 1 (fall 2008), 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., and Simonson, I. Buying, bidding, playing or competing?: Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 1–2 (2003), 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, M.J., and Reynolds, K.E. Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79, 2 (2003), 77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin, B.J., and Attaway, J.S. Atmospheric affect as a tool for creating value and gaining share of customer. Journal of Business Research, 49, 2 (2000), 91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; and Griffin, M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, (March 1994), 644–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P., and Youjae, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1 (1988), 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J.; Levy, M.; and Grewal, D. An experimental approach to making retail store environmental decisions. Journal of Retailing, 68, 4 (1992), 445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M.H., and Samuelson, W.F. I won the auction but don’t want the prize. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27, 4 (1983), 618–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, S. ., and Ferrell, M.E. Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. Journal of Retailing, 74, 2 (1998), 169–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockstedt, J., and Goh, K.H. Seller strategies for differentiation in highly competitive online auction markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 3 (2012), 235–268.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J.M., and Fairhurst, A. Consumer shopping value, satisfaction, and loyalty for retail apparel brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9, 3 (2005), 256–269.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, T.L.; Carr, C.L.; Peck, J.; and Carson, S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 4 (2001), 511–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R., and Nowlis, S.M. The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 4 (1999), 369–384.
   Google Scholar
• Dhurup, M., and Dlodlo, N. To play or not to play! Online fantasy football consumption motives and the relationship with attitude and future behavioural intentions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 14 (2013), 201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, R.J., and Rossiter, J.R. Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58, 1 (1982), 34–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu, S.A.; Machleit, K.; and Barr, T.F. Perceived retail crowding and shopping satisfaction: The role of shopping values. Journal of Business Research, 58, 8 (2005), 1146–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu, S.A.; Machleit, K.A.; and Davis, L.M. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research, 54, 2 (2001), 177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Filiz-Ozbay, E., and Ozbay, E.Y. Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. American Economic Review, 79, 4 (2007), 1407–1418.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 3 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giese, J.L., and Gote, J.A. Defining consumer satisfaction. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2000, 1 (2000), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, E.A. Reserves, regret, and rejoicing in open English auctions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 2 (2004), 264–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, H.H. Modern Factor Analysis, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, A. A multi-method investigation of consumer motivations in impulse buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 5 (2000), 403–419.
   Google Scholar
• Hayne, S.C.; Smith, C. A.P.; and Vijayasarathy, L.R. Who wins on eBay: An analysis of bidders and their bid behaviours. Electronic Markets, 13, 4 (2003), 282–293.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, D., and M.Capella, L. Shopper reactions to perceived time pressure. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 23, 12 (1995), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J.E.; Orhun, Y.; and Ariely, D. Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 4 (2004), 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jai, T.-M. C.; Burns, L.D.; and King, N.J. The effect of behavioral tracking practices on consumers’ shopping evaluations and repurchase intention toward trusted online retailers. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 3(2013), 901–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, C.L., and Zaichkowsky, J.L. Bidding behavior at the auction. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 4 (2003), 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.A.; Reynolds, K.E.; and Arnold, M.J. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effect on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59, 9 (2006), 974–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagel, J.H. and Levin, D. The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. American Economic Review, 76, 5 (1986), 894–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and Lennon, S.J. Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers’ emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention: Based on the stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7, 1 (2013), 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, G. Auctions and auction fever: Explanations from competitive arousal and framing. Kellogg Journal of Organization Behavior, 2000 (2000), 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, G.; Malhotra, D.; and Murnighan, J.K. Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 2 (2005), 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; and Wei, K.K. Negative price premium effect in online market—The impact of competition and buyer informativeness on the pricing strategies of sellers with different reputation levels. Decision Support Systems, 54, 1 (2012), 681–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano, H., and Richard L.O. Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, (December 1993), 451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H.W., and Hocevar, D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 3 (May 1985), 562–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maule, A.J.; Hockey, G.R.J.; and Bdzola, L. Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: Changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychologica, 104, 3 (2000), 283–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J. A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Möllenberg, A. Internet auctions in marketing: The consumer perspective. Electronic Markets, 14, 4 (2004), 360–371.
   Google Scholar
• Murnighan, J.K. A very extreme case of the dollar auction. Journal of Management Education, 26, 1 (2002), 56–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ockenfels, A., and Roth, A.E. Late and multiple bidding in second price Internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games and Economic Behavior, 55, 2 (2006), 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, W. C2C Versus B2C: A comparison of the winner’s curse in two types of electronic auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 4 (summer 2002), 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overby, J.W., and Lee, E.-J. The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59, 10–11 (2006), 1160–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.C.; Keil, M.; Kim, J.U.; and Bock, G.-W. Understanding overbidding behavior in C2C auctions: An escalation theory perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 6 (2012), 643–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietersa, R., and Warlop, L. Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 1 (1999), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K.E.; Gilkeson, J.H.; and Niedrich, R.W. The influence of seller strategy on the winning price in online auctions: A moderated mediation model, 62, 1 (2009), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rook, D.W. The buying impulse. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, (September 1987), 189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, E.R.; Crowley, A.E.; and Henderson, P.W. Improving the store environment: Do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 60, 2 (1996), 67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, M.R., and Stern, B. Consumer bidding behavior on Internet auction sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 1 (fall 2002), 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standifird, S.S.; Roelofs, M.R.; and Durham, Y. The impact of eBay’s buy-it-now function on bidder behavior. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9, 2 (winter 2004−05), 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, R., and Monroe, K.B. The effect of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 1(2003), 92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepinska, T.; Iwasaki, W.; and Abeel, T. The spirit of competition: To win or not to win. PLoS Computational Biology, 9, 12 (2013), e1003413.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 4 (2004), 695–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeir, I., and Van Kenhove, P. The influence of need for closure and perceived time pressure on search effort for price and promotional information in a grocery shopping context. Psychology and Marketing, 22 (2005), 71–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, V.A. Stimuli–organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment. Journal of Business Research, 66, 9 (2013), 1420–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S.G., and Clark, J.M. Bidding behavior in on-line auctions: An examination of the eBay Pokemon card market. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 4 (2002), 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, P., and Gottwald, W. Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions. Journal of Business Research, 10, 1 (1982), 43–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and Lu, X. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivators on using utilitarian, hedonic, and dual-purposed information systems: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 3 (2013), 153–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar