Consumer’s Electronic Word-of-Mouth Adoption: The Trust Transfer Perspective

References

• Ayeh, J.K.; Au, N.; and Law, R. Do we believe in TripAdvisor? Examining credibility perceptions and online travelers’ attitude toward using user-generated content. Journal of Travel Research, 52, 4 (2013), 437–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayeh, J.K.; Au, N.; and Law, R. Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning. Tourism Management, 35(2013), 132–143.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, H.; Ahn, J.H.; and Choi, Y. Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers’ objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 2 (2012), 99–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; and Bose, I. Whose online reviews to trust? Understanding reviewer trustworthiness and its impact on business. Decision Support Systems, 96(2017), 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1986), 1173–1182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaton, C. Why you can’t really trust negative online reviews. New York Times, (June 13 2018), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Benitez-Amado, J.; Henseler, J.; and Castillo, A. Development and update of guidelines to perform and report partial least squares path modeling in information systems research. In Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, 2017, 86. Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/86/
   Google Scholar
• Benitez, J.; Llorens, J.; and Braojos, J. How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Information and Management, 55, 4 (2018), 508–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntain, C., and Golbeck, J. Trust transfer between contexts. Journal of Trust Management, 2, 6 (2015), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J.T., and Petty, R.E. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 1 (1984), 673–675.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. Online reviews: Do consumers use them? Advances in Consumer Research, 28(2001), 129–133.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.C., and Tseng, Y.D. Quality evaluation of product reviews using an information quality framework. Decision Support Systems, 50, 4 (2011), 755–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X.; Fu, S.; Sun, J.; Bilgihan, A.; and Okumus, F. An investigation on online reviews in sharing economy driven hospitality platforms: A viewpoint of trust. Tourism Management, 71(2019), 366–377.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C.; Sia, C.L.; and Kuan, K. Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 8 ( August 2012), 618–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, M.K.O.; and Rabjohn, L.N. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18, 3 (2008), 229–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. Y.; Luo, C.; Sia, C. L.; and Chen, H. Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 4 ( Summer 2009), 9–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, L.; Mudambi, S.M.; and Schuff, D. Is it the review or the reviewer? A multi-method approach to determine the antecedents of online review helpfulness. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, C.; Russello, G.; and Dulay, N. Trust transfer in distributed systems. In S. Etalle and S. Marsh (eds.), IFIP 2007 International Federation for Information Processing (Trust Management). Boston: Springer, 2007, pp. 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Donney, P.M., and Cannon, J.P. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61 (April 1997), 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ducoffe, R.H. Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 5 ( September/October 1996), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastin, M.S. Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6, 4 (July 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Einwiller, S., and Will, M. The role of reputation to engender trust in electronic markets. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Corporate Reputation, Identity, and Competitiveness. Paris, France, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Elgoibar, P.; Munduate, L.; and Euwema, M. Building trust and constructive conflict management in organizations. In P. Elgoibar, M.C. Euwema, and L. Munduate (eds.), Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations. Boston: Springer, 2016, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Filieri, R. What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. Journal of Business Research, 68(2015), 1261–1270.
   Google Scholar
• Filieri, R.; Alguezaui, S.; and McLeay, F. Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tourism Management, 51(2015), 174–185.
   Google Scholar
• Filieri, R., and McLeay, F. E-WOM and accommodation: An analysis of the factors that influence travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews. Journal of Travel Research, 53, 1 (2013), 44–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C.R., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, J.S., and Seiter, R.H. Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining, 5th ed. New York: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C., and McGrath, K. Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(1986), 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Grabner-Krauter, S., and Kaluscha, E.A. Empirical research in on-line trust: A review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58(2003), 783–812.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; and Anderson, R. E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; and Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 1 (2015), 115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, I.B. Building initial trust in an intermediary in B2C online marketplaces: The Korean evidence from Interpark.com. Journal of Global Information Management, 26, 2 (2018), 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, I.B., and Cho, H. The impact of consumer trust on attitudinal loyalty and purchase intentions in B2C e-marketplaces: Intermediary trust vs. seller trust. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 5 (2011), 469–479.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C.I.; Janis, I.L.; and Kelley, H.H. Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C., and Weiss, W. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(1951), 635–650.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Tractinsky, N.; and Vitale, M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 1 (2000), 45–71.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.L.; Averbeck, J.M.; Zhang, Z.; and Wright, K.B. Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 1 (2013), 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., and Benbasat, I. Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2004), 111–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, K. Review websites try to thwart false customer ratings. Globe, September 25, 2013. http://www.globe.com. Accessed on May 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, B.K.; Strong, D.M.; and Wang, R.Y. Information quality benchmarks: Product and service performance. Communications of the ACM, 45, 4ve (April 2002), 184–192.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, S., and Wang, F. Online review helpfulness: Impact of reviewer profile image. Decision Support Systems, 96(2017), 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.J., and Shin, S.Y. When do consumers buy online product reviews? Effects of review quality, product type, and reviewer’s photo. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(2014), 356–366.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.D., and Han, I. The different effects of online consumer reviews on consumers’ purchase intentions depending on trust in online shopping malls: An advertising perspective. Internet Research, 21, 2 (2011), 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.T., and Koo, D.M. Effects of attribute and valence of e-WOM on message adoption: Moderating roles of subjective knowledge and regulatory focus. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2012), 1974–1984.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.; Rodgers, S.; and Kim, M. Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude toward the brand and website. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31, 2 (2009), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and Turban, E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 1 (2001), 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H.; Saraf, N.; Hu, Q.; and Xue, Y. Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 59–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y.S., and van der Heide, B. Evaluating the wisdom of strangers: The perceived credibility of online consumer reviews on Yelp. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2015), 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J.; Lu, Y.; Wang, B.; and Wei, K. The role of inter-channel trust transfer in establishing mobile commerce trust. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(2011), 615–625.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J.; Yu, C.S.; and Liu, C. Facilitating conditions, wireless trust and adoption intention. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46, 1 (2005), 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; and Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(1995), 709–734.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D.H., and Chervany, N.L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2 (winter 2001–2002), 35–59.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D.H.; Choudhur, V.; and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 3 (September 2002), 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, A. M.; Deshpande, A. D.; Perri III, M.; and Zinkhan, G. M. Trust in online prescription drug information among Internet users: The impact on information search behavior after exposure to direct-to-consumer advertising. Health Marketing Quarterly, 20, 1 (2002), 17–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, P. Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65(1988), 567–574.
   Google Scholar
• Milliman, R.E., and Fugate, D.L. Using trust-transference as a persuasion technique: An empirical field investigation. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 8, 2 (1988), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R.M., and Hunt, S.D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(1994), 20–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mudambi, S.M., and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (March 2010), 185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L.K., and Muthén, B.O. How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 4 (2002), 599–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, B. Briefing: Reviews and credibility—Websites strive to build trust. FM Recruitment. 2015. http://www.fmrecruitment.com ( accessed on May 30, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. The reviews are in: Yelp users are four-star consumers. 2013. http://www.nielsen.com ( accessed on May 26, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19, 3 (1990), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otterbacher, J. “Helpfulness” in online communities: A measure of message quality. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston: ACM, 2009, pp. 955–964.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., and Zhang, J.Q. Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. Journal of Retailing, 87, 4 (2011), 598–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P.A., and Gefen, D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15, 1 (March 2004), 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic, 1986, pp. 123–205.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M.; MacKenzie, S. B.; Lee, J. Y.; and Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M., and Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 4 (1986), 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2 (2004), 243–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priester, J.R., and Petty, R.E. The influence of spokesperson trustworthiness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 4 (2003), 408–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, L.; Pang, J.; and Lim, K.H. Effects of conflicting aggregated rating on eWOM review credibility and diagnosticity: The moderating role of review valence. Decision Support Systems, 54(2012), 631–643.
   Google Scholar
• Racherla, P., and Friske, W. Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 6 (2012), 548–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racherla, P.; Mandviwalla, M.; and Connolly, D. Factors affecting consumers’ trust in online product reviews. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 2 (2012), 94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siering, M.; Muntermann, J.; and Rajagopalan, B. Explaining and predicting online review helpfulness: The role of content and reviewer-related signals. Decision Support Systems, 108(2018), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M.D., and Rouner, D. How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 4 (1996), 974–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternthal, B.; Dholakia, R.; and Leavitt, C. The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 4 (1978), 252–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K.J. Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14, 1 (2003), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman, S.W., and Siegal, W.S. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14, 1 (2003), 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle, B. Amazon lawsuit shows that fake online reviews are a big problem. Money, October 20, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Utz, S.; Kerkhof, P.; and van den Bos, J. Consumers rule: How consumer reviews influence perceived trustworthiness of online stores. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(2012), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N.; Shen, X.; and Sun, Y. Transition of electronic word-of-mouth services from web to mobile context: A trust transfer perspective. Decision Support Systems, 54(2013), 1394–1403.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R.Y., and Strong, D.M. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumer. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 4 (1996), 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, J.L., and Mowen, J.C. Source credibility: On the independent effects of trust and expertise. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1986), 306–310.
   Google Scholar
• Willemsen, L.M.; Neijens, P.C.; Bronner, F.; and De Ridder, J.A. “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17, 1 (2011), 19–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F.; Huang, L.; and Dou, W. Social factors in user perceptions and responses to advertising in online social networking communities. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10, 1 (2009), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., and Watts, S. Online communities as communities of practice: A case study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 4 (2008), 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., and Zhang, X. Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2010), 133–148.
   Google Scholar