3,811
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Will You Ever Trust the Review Website Again? The Importance of Source Credibility

&

References

  • Ahmad, S.N., and Laroche, M. How do expressed emotions affect the helpfulness of a product review? Evidence from reviews using latent semantic analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 1 (2015), 76–111.
  • Alexandrov, A.; Lilly, B.; and Babakus, E. The effects of social-and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 5 (2013), 531–546.
  • Ayeh, J.K. Travellers’ acceptance of consumer-generated media: An integrated model of technology acceptance and source credibility theories. Computers in Human Behavior, 48 (2015), 173–180.
  • Ayeh, J.K.; Au, N.; and Law, R. ‘Do we believe in TripAdvisor?’ Examining credibility perceptions and online travelers’ attitude toward using user-generated content. Journal of Travel Research, 52, 4 (2013), 437–452.
  • Bae, S., and Lee, T. Product type and consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews. Electronic Markets, 21, 4 (2011), 255–266.
  • Bagozzi, R.P.; Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V.; and Flavián, C. The role of anticipated emotions in purchase intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 33, 8 (2016), 629–645.
  • Bansal, H.S., and Voyer, P.A. Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3, 2 (2000), 166–177.
  • Bell, D.E. Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33, 1 (1985), 1–27.
  • Berger, J.; Sorensen, A.T.; and Rasmussen, S.J. Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 29, 5 (2010), 815–827.
  • Brown, J.; Broderick, A.J.; and Lee, N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 3 (2007), 2–20.
  • Chaiken, S.; Liberman, A.; and Eagly, A.H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J.S. Uleman and J.A. Bargh (eds.), Unintended Thought. New York: Guilford Press, 1989, pp. 212–252.
  • Cheung, C.M.K., and Thadani, D.R. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54, 1 (2012), 461–470.
  • Cheung, C.M.-Y.; Sia, C.-L.; and Kuan, K.K. Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 8 (2012), 618–635.
  • Cheung, M.Y.; Luo, C.; Sia, C.L.; and Chen, H. Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 4 (2009), 9–38.
  • Compton, J. Inoculation theory. In J.P. Dillard and L. Shen (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2013, pp. 220–237.
  • De Pelsmacker, P.; van Tilburg, S.; and Holthof, C. Digital marketing strategies, online reviews and hotel performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72 (2018), 47–55.
  • Ein-Gar, D.; Shiv, B.; and Tormala, Z.L. When blemishing leads to blossoming: The positive effect of negative information. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 5 (2011), 846–859.
  • Fan, A.; Shen, H.; Wu, L.; Mattila, A.; and Bilgihan, A. Whom do we trust? Cultural differences in consumer responses to online recommendations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30, 3 (2018), 1508–1525.
  • Filieri, R.; Alguezaui, S.; and McLeay, F. Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tourism Management, 51 (2015), 174–185.
  • Filieri, R.; McLeay, F.; Tsui, B.; and Lin, Z. Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention in online consumer reviews of services. Information & Management, 55, 8 (2018), 956–970.
  • Flanagin, A.J., and Metzger, M.J. Trusting expert-versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 4 (2013), 1626–1634.
  • Genesove, D., and Mayer, C. Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 4 (2001), 1233–1260.
  • Gómez, M.; Martín‐Consuegra, D.; Díaz, E.; and Molina, A. Determinants and outcomes of price premium and loyalty: A food case study. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17, 1 (2018), 64–74.
  • Gottschalk, S.A., and Mafael, A. Cutting through the online review jungle—Investigating selective eWOM processing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37 (2017), 89–104.
  • Grewal, D.; Gotlieb, J.; and Marmorstein, H. The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price–perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1 (1994), 145–153.
  • Gupta, S., and Zeithaml, V. Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Science, 25, 6 (2006), 718–739.
  • Hautz, J.; Füller, J.; Hutter, K.; and Thürridl, C. Let users generate your video ads? The impact of video source and quality on consumers’ perceptions and intended behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 1 (2014), 1–15.
  • Hayes, A.F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press, 2017.
  • Hovland, C.I., and Weiss, W. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 4 (1951), 635–650.
  • Huang, G.-H., and Korfiatis, N. Trying before buying: The moderating role of online reviews in trial attitude formation toward mobile applications. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19, 4 (2015), 77–111.
  • Hussain, S.; Ahmed, W.; Jafar, R.M.S.; Rabnawaz, A.; and Jianzhou, Y. eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer’s information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 66 (2017), 96–102.
  • Jeong, H.-J., and Koo, D.-M. Combined effects of valence and attributes of e-WOM on consumer judgment for message and product: The moderating effect of brand community type. Internet Research, 25, 1 (2015), 2–29.
  • Johnson, T.J., and Kaye, B.K. In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the internet among politically interested internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1 (2009), 175–182.
  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. Prospect theory. Econometrica, 47 (1979), 263–292.
  • Kim, M., and Lennon, S.J. Consumer response to online apparel stockouts. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 2 (2011), 115–144.
  • Kim, S.J.; Maslowska, E.; and Malthouse, E.C. Understanding the effects of different review features on purchase probability. International Journal of Advertising, 37, 1 (2018), 29–53.
  • Kuksov, D., and Wang, K. The bright side of loss aversion in dynamic and competitive markets. Marketing Science, 33, 5 (2014), 693–711.
  • Lee, J.A., and Murnighan, J.K. The Empathy‐Prospect model and the choice to help. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 4 (2001), 816–839.
  • Lee, M., and Youn, S. Electronic word of mouth (eWOM). How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 28, 3 (2009), 473–499.
  • Leung, X.Y., and Bai, B. How motivation, opportunity, and ability impact travelers’ social media involvement and revisit intention. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30, 1–2 (2013), 58–77.
  • Lin, C., and Lekhawipat, W. How customer expectations become adjusted after purchase. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 4 (2016), 443–469.
  • Lowry, P.B.; Wilson, D.W.; and Haig, W.L. A picture is worth a thousand words: Source credibility theory applied to logo and website design for heightened credibility and consumer trust. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30, 1 (2014), 63–93.
  • Luo, C.; Luo, X.R.; Xu, Y.; Warkentin, M.; and Sia, C.L. Examining the moderating role of sense of membership in online review evaluation. Information & Management, 52, 3 (2015), 305–316.
  • Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 4 (1980), 460–469.
  • Oliver, R.L., and Swan, J.E. Equity and disconfirmation perceptions as influences on merchant and product satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 3 (1989), 372–383.
  • Parayitam, S., and Dooley, R.S. The interplay between cognitive-and affective conflict and cognition-and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62, 8 (2009), 789–796.
  • Park, D.-H., and Lee, J. eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 4 (2008), 386–398.
  • Park, D.-H.; Lee, J.; and Han, I. The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11, 4 (2007), 125–148.
  • Plotkina, D.; Munzel, A.; and Pallud, J. Illusions of truth—Experimental insights into human and algorithmic detections of fake online reviews. Journal of Business Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.009
  • Pornpitakpan, C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2 (2004), 243–281.
  • Purnawirawan, N.; Eisend, M.; De Pelsmacker, P.; and Dens, N. A meta-analytic investigation of the role of valence in online reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31 (2015), 17–27.
  • Qiu, L.; Pang, J.; and Lim, K.H. Effects of conflicting aggregated rating on eWOM review credibility and diagnosticity: The moderating role of review valence. Decision Support Systems, 54, 1 (2012), 631–643.
  • Rainey, D.W.; Yost, J.H.; and Larsen, J. Disappointment theory and disappointment among football fans. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34, 2 (2011), 175–187.
  • Reimer, T., and Benkenstein, M. When good WOM hurts and bad WOM gains: The effect of untrustworthy online reviews. Journal of Business Research, 69, 12 (2016), 5993–6001.
  • Rieh, S.Y., and Danielson, D.R. Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 1 (2007), 307–364.
  • Ruiz-Mafe, C.; Chatzipanagiotou, K.; and Curras-Perez, R. The role of emotions and conflicting online reviews on consumers’ purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 89 (2018), 336–344.
  • Schindler, R.M., and Bickart, B. Published word of mouth: Referable, consumer-generated information on the Internet. In C.P. Haugtvedt, K. A. Machleit, and R. Yalch (eds.), Online Consumer Psychology: Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behavior in the Virtual World, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, pp. 35–61.
  • Schwarz, N. Agenda 2000—Social judgment and attitudes: Warmer, more social, and less conscious. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 2 (2000), 149–176.
  • Shan, Y. How credible are online product reviews? The effects of self-generated and system-generated cues on source credibility evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55 (2016), 633–641.
  • Shoham, M.; Moldovan, S.; and Steinhart, Y. Positively useless: Irrelevant negative information enhances positive impressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 2 (2017), 147–159.
  • Sparks, B.A., and Browning, V. The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32, 6 (2011), 1310–1323.
  • Sparks, B.A.; So, K.K.F.; and Bradley, G.L. Responding to negative online reviews: The effects of hotel responses on customer inferences of trust and concern. Tourism Management, 53 (2016), 74–85.
  • Tereyağoğlu, N.; Fader, P.S.; and Veeraraghavan, S. Multiattribute loss aversion and reference dependence: Evidence from the performing arts industry. Management Science, 64, 1 (2017), 421–436.
  • Wang, L.; Qian, D.; and Zhu, L. The effect of system generated cues on microblog rewarding repost behavior—A source credibility perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19, 1 (2018), 104–118.
  • Wang, L.C., and Hsiao, D.F. Antecedents of flow in retail store shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19, 4 (2012), 381–389.
  • Wilson, E.J., and Sherrell, D.L. Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 2 (1993), 101–112.
  • Xiang, Z., and Gretzel, U. Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31, 2 (2010), 179–188.
  • Xie, H.J.; Miao, L.; Kuo, P.-J.; and Lee, B.-Y. Consumers’ responses to ambivalent online hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional disposition. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 1 (2011), 178–183.
  • Xie, K.L., and So, K.K.F. The effects of reviewer expertise on future reputation, popularity, and financial performance of hotels: Insights from data-analytics. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, forthcoming (2018).
  • Zajonc, R.B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 2 (1980), 151–175.
  • Zajonc, R.B., and Markus, H. Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 2 (1982), 123–131.
  • Zeelenberg, M., and Pieters, R. Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services. Journal of Business Research, 57, 4 (2004), 445–455.
  • Zeelenberg, M.; van Dijk, W.W.; Manstead, A.S.R.; and van der Pligt, J. On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 4 (2000), 521–541.
  • Zhang, H.; Sun, J.; Liu, F.; and G. Knight, J. Be rational or be emotional: Advertising appeals, service types and consumer responses. European Journal of Marketing, 48, 11/12 (2014), 2105–2126.
  • Zhang, W., and Watts, S.A. Capitalizing on content: Information adoption in two online communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 2 (2008), 73–94.
  • Zhao, X.; Lynch Jr, J.G.; and Chen, Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 2 (2010), 197–206.
  • Zhuang, M.; Cui, G.; and Peng, L. Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 87 (2018), 24–35.
  • Ziegele, M., and Weber, M. Example, please! Comparing the effects of single customer reviews and aggregate review scores on online shoppers’ product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14, 2 (2015), 103–114.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.