531
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Enterprise Social Software Platforms and Team Improvisation

, , , &

References

  • Adler, P.S., and Kwon, S.-W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 1 (2002), 17–40.
  • Aladwani, A.M. An integrated performance model of information systems projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 1 (2002), 185–210.
  • Alavi, S.; Wahab, D.A.; Muhamad, N.; and Shirani, B.A. Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 21 (2014), 6273–6295.
  • Ancona, D.; Bresman, H.; and Kaeufer, K. The comparative advantage of X-Teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43, 3 (2002), 33–39.
  • Anderson, J.R. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
  • Arora, V.; Ward, K.; and Petter, S. The role of information systems to support improvisation during emergencies. Proceedings of the Fifth Midwest Association for Information Systems Conference. Moorhead, MN: Bepress, 2010.
  • Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y.; and Phillips, L.W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 3 (1991), 421–458.
  • Bahrami, H., and Evans, S. Super-Flexibility for Knowledge Enterprise. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005.
  • Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
  • Becker, J.-M.; Klein, K.; and Wetzels, M. Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45, 5–6 (2012), 359–394.
  • Burt, R.S. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, and R. Burt (eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2001, pp. 31–56.
  • Camisón, C., and Forés, B. Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63, 7 (2010), 707–715.
  • Chen, M.H.; Chang, Y.C.; and Hung, S.C. Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 38, 1 (2008), 21–34.
  • Chen, R., and Sharma, S.K. Self-disclosure at social networking sites: An exploration through relational capitals. Information Systems Frontiers, 15, 2 (2013), 269–278.
  • Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 295–336.
  • Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1 (1990), 128–152.
  • Conboy, K. Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 329–354.
  • Danneels, E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 12 (2002), 1095–1121.
  • DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 2 (1994), 121–147.
  • Ding, G.; Liu, H.; Huang, Q.; and Gu, J. Enterprise social networking usage as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and employee creativity: A multilevel study. Information & Management, 56, 8 (2019), 103–165.
  • Doll, W.J., and Deng, X. Antecedents of improvisation in IT-enabled engineering work. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 23, 3 (2011), 26–47.
  • Du, W.; Wu, J.; Liu, S.; and Hackney, R.A. Effective organizational improvisation in information systems development: Insights from the Tencent messaging system development. Information & Management, 56, 4 (2019), 614–624.
  • Edwards, A.; Housley, W.; Williams, M.; Sloan, L.; and Williams, M. Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: Surrogacy, augmentation and re-orientation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 3 (2013), 245–260.
  • Edwards, J.R., and Lambert, L.S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1 (2007), 1–22.
  • Engelbrecht, A.; Gerlach, J.P.; Benlian, A.; and Buxmann, P. How employees gain meta-knowledge using enterprise social networks: A validation and extension of communication visibility theory. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28, 3 (2019), 292–309.
  • Fulk, J., and Yuan, Y.C. Location, motivation, and social capitalization via enterprise social networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 1 (2013), 20–37.
  • García-Villaverde, P.M.; Rodrigo-Alarcón, J.; Ruiz-Ortega, M.J.; and Parra-Requena, G. The role of knowledge absorptive capacity on the relationship between cognitive social capital and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 5 (2018), 1015–1036.
  • Gibbs, J.L.; Eisenberg, J.; Rozaidi, N.A.; and Gryaznova, A. The “megapozitiv” role of enterprise social media in enabling cross-boundary communication in a distributed Russian organization. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1 (2015), 75–102.
  • Gin, J.L.; Stein, J.A.; Heslin, K.C.; and Dobalian, A. Responding to risk: Awareness and action after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Safety Science, 65 (2014), 86–92.
  • Greve, A. Absorptive capacity and social capital: Innovation and environmental regulation. In E. Bjørndal, M. Bjørndal, P. Pardalos, and M. Rönnqvist (eds.), Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics. Berlin: Springer, 2010, pp. 379–393.
  • Hahn, J.; Moon, J.Y.; and Zhang, C. Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Information Systems Research, 19, 3 (2008), 369–391.
  • Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; and Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31, 1 (2019), 2–24.
  • Han, J., and Hovav, A. To bridge or to bond? Diverse social connections in an IS project team. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 3 (2013), 378–390.
  • Hayes, A.F. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1 (2015), 1–22.
  • Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; and Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20 (2009), 277–319.
  • Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; and Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 1 (2015), 115–135.
  • Hoegl, M.; Parboteeah, K.P.; and Munson, C.L. Team‐level antecedents of individuals’ knowledge networks. Decision Sciences, 34, 4 (2003), 741–770.
  • Houghton, R.; El Sawy, O.A.; Gray, P.; Donegan, C.; and Joshi, A. Vigilant information systems for managing enterprises in dynamic supply chains: Real-time dashboards. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3, 1 (2004), 19–35.
  • Jakobsen, M., and Jensen, R. Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18, 1 (2015), 3–30.
  • Kane, G.C. Enterprise social media: Current capabilities and future possibilities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14, 1 (2015), 1–16.
  • Kautz, K. Improvisation in information systems development practice. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 11, 4 (2009), 30–59.
  • Kirkman, B.L., and Mathieu, J.E. The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 5 (2005), 700–718.
  • Kuegler, M.; Smolnik, S.; and Kane, G. What’s in IT for employees? Understanding the relationship between use and performance in enterprise social software. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24, 2 (2015), 90–112.
  • Kumar, N.; Stern, L.W.; and Anderson, J.C. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 6 (1993), 1633–1651.
  • Leonardi, P.M. Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: Using social media to learn “who knows what” and “who knows whom”. MIS Quarterly, 39, 4 (2015), 747–762.
  • Leonardi, P.M.; Huysman, M.; and Steinfield, C. Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, 19, 1 (2013), 1–19.
  • Levallet, N., and Chan, Y.E. The role of information systems in organizational improvisation: A perspective based on two complementary theories. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Chicago, Illinois: Bepress, 2013.
  • Li, L. The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra- and inter-organizational relationships. International Business Review, 14, 1 (2005), 77–95.
  • Magni, M.; Proserpio, L.; Hoegl, M.; and Provera, B. The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Research Policy, 38, 6 (2009), 1044–1053.
  • Makkonen, H., and Virtanen, K. Social capital approach on Enterprise 2.0: A multiple case study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27, 10 (2015), 1212–1225.
  • Mark, G.; Guy, I.; Kremer-Davidson, S.; and Jacovi, M. Most liked, fewest friends: Patterns of enterprise social media use. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social computing. Baltimore, MD: ACM, 2014, pp. 393–404.
  • Marrone, J.A.; Tesluk, P.E.; and Carson, J.B. A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 6 (2007), 1423–1439.
  • McKnight, B., and Bontis, N. E‐improvisation: Collaborative groupware technology expands the reach and effectiveness of organizational improvisation. Knowledge and Process Management, 9, 4 (2002), 219–227.
  • Mendonça, D. Decision support for improvisation in response to extreme events: Learning from the response to the 2001 World Trade Center attack. Decision Support Systems, 43, 3 (2007), 952–967.
  • Miner, A.S.; Bassoff, P.; and Moorman, C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 2 (2001), 304–337.
  • Moorman, C., and Miner, A.S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23, 4 (1998), 698–723.
  • Moorman, C., and Miner, A.S. The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62, 3 (1998), 1–20.
  • Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 2 (1998), 242–266.
  • Nayar, V. A shared purpose drives collaboration. Harvard Business Review. April 2, 2014.
  • Nelson, K.M., and Cooprider, J.G. The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quarterly, 20, 4 (1996), 409–432.
  • Pavlou, P.A., and El Sawy, O.A. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments. Information Systems Research, 17, 3 (2006), 198–227.
  • Pavlou, P.A., and El Sawy, O.A. When do improvisational capabilities trump dynamic capabilities? Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2007, 1 (2007), 1–5.
  • Pavlou, P.A., and El Sawy, O.A. The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21, 3 (2010), 443–471.
  • Payne, G.T.; Moore, C.B.; Griffis, S.E.; and Autry, C.W. Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37, 2 (2011), 491–520.
  • Peng, C., and Li, J. Research on relationship among team external social capital and team learning ability: Empirical test about enterprise R&D team. Studies in Science of Science, 29, 9 (2011), 1374–1381.
  • Perry-Smith, J.E., and Shalley, C.E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 1 (2003), 89–106.
  • Pina e Cunha, M.; Vieira da Cunha, J.; and Kamoche, K. Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 3 (1999), 299–341.
  • Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879–903.
  • Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1 (2012), 539–569.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., and Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 4 (1986), 531–544.
  • Preacher, K.J.; Rucker, D.D.; and Hayes, A.F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 1 (2007), 185–227.
  • Putnam, R.D. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 1 (1995), 65–78.
  • Putnam, R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
  • Rodríguez-Entrena, M.; Schuberth, F.; and Gelhard, C. Assessing statistical differences between parameters estimates in partial least squares path modeling. Quality and quantity, 52, 1 (2018), 57–69.
  • Sarker, S., and Sarker, S. Exploring agility in distributed information systems development teams: An interpretive study in an offshoring context. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 440–461.
  • Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F.; Cheah, J.-H.; Becker, J.-M.; and Ringle, C.M. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27, 3 (2019), 197–211.
  • Singleton, R.A., and Straits, B.C. Approaches to Social Research, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • Steinfield, C.; Dimicco, J.M.; Ellison, N.B.; and Lampe, C. Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Pennsylvania, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 245–254.
  • Stine, R. An introduction to bootstrap methods: Examplesand ideas. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 2–3 (1989), 243–291.
  • Summers, J.K.; Humphrey, S.E.; and Ferris, G.R. Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 2 (2012), 314–338.
  • Sun, Y., and Shang, R. The interplay between users’ intraorganizational social media use and social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 37 (2014), 334–341.
  • Sun, Y.; Wang, C.; and Jeyaraj, A. Enterprise social media affordances as enablers of knowledge transfer and creative performance: An empirical study. Telematics and Informatics, 51 (2020), 101402.
  • Treem, J.W., and Leonardi, P.M. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36, 1 (2013), 143–189.
  • Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 4 (1998), 464–476.
  • Van Mierlo, H.; Vermunt, J.K.; and Rutte, C.G. Composing group-level constructs from individual-level survey data. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 2 (2009), 368–392.
  • Van Osch, W., and Steinfield, C.W. Team boundary spanning: Strategic implications for the implementation and use of enterprise social media. Journal of Information Technology, 31, 2 (2016), 207–225.
  • Van Osch, W., and Steinfield, C.W. Strategic visibility in enterprise social media: Implications for network formation and boundary spanning. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 2 (2018), 647–682.
  • Vera, D., and Crossan, M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16, 3 (2005), 203–224.
  • Wang, D.; Guo, W.; and Liu, X. Study on the impact of group internal social network on group creativity. Soft Science, 23, 9 (2009), 25–28.
  • Weick, K.E. Organizational redesign as improvisation. In G.P. Huber and W.H. Glick (eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 346–379.
  • Weick, K.E. Introductory essay—Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 5 (1998), 543–555.
  • Weick, K.E. The aesthetic of imperfection in orchestras and organizations. In M.P. Cunha and C.A. Marques (eds.), Readings in Organisation Science. Lisbon, Portugal: ISPA, 1999, pp. 541–563.
  • Werder, K., and Maedche, A. Explaining the emergence of team agility: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Information Technology & People, 31, 3 (2018), 819–844.
  • Wetzels, M.; Odekerken-Schröder, G.; and Van Oppen, C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33, 1 (2009), 177–195.
  • Williams, D. On and off the ’net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11, 2 (2006), 593–628.
  • Xiong, G., and Bharadwaj, S. Social capital of young technology firms and their IPO values: The complementary role of relevant absorptive capacity. Journal of Marketing, 75, 6 (2011), 87–104.
  • Xue, Y.; Bradley, J.; and Liang, H. Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 2 (2011), 299–312.
  • Zahra, S.A., and George, G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 2 (2002), 185–203.
  • Zhang, K. The influencing machinism of team climate, absorptive capability on team performance—A perspective from knowledge integration [Doctoral dissertation]. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 2009.
  • Zhao, X.; Lynch, J.G.; and Chen, Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 2 (2010), 197–206.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.