Consumer Vigilance and Choice Overload in Online Shopping

References

• Alba, J.; Lynch, J.; Weitz, B.; Janiszewski, C.; Lutz, R.; Sawyer, A.; and Wood, S. Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. The Journal of Marketing, 61, 3 (1997), 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljukhadar, M.; Senecal, S.; and Daoust, C. Using recommendation agents to cope with information overload. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 2 (2012), 41–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 4 (1982), 369–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.R. Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem situations. Psychological Review, 94, 2 (1987), 192–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; and Griffin, M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 4 (1994), 644–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P. Attitude formation under the theory of reasoned action: A purposeful behavior reformulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 2 (2011), 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, D., and Spann, M. The interplay between online consumer reviews and recommender systems: An experimental analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19, 1 (2014), 129–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J.; Draganska, M.; and Simonson, I. The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Science, 26, 4 (2007), 460–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatwright, P., and Nunes, J. C. Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. Journal of Marketing, 65, 3 (2001), 50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borle, S.; Boatwright, P.; Kadane, J.B.; Nunes, J.C.; and Galit, S. The effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Science, 24, 4 (2005), 616–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botti, S., and Lyengar, S.S. The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: When people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 3 (2004), 312–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk, S.M.; Hoyer, W.D.; and McAlister, L. Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 2 (1998), 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E.; Hu, Y.J.; and Simester, D. Goodbye pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Science, 57, 8 (2011), 1373–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. The effect of the number of product subcategories on perceived variety and shopping experience in an online store. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25, 3 (2011), 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.H.; Hsu, I.C.; and Lin, C.C. Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Business Research, 63, 9 (2010), 1007–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A. When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 2 (2003), 170–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A. Product assortment and individual decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1 (2003), 151–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A. Feature complementarity and assortment in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 4 (2005), 748–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A. Decision focus and consumer choice among assortments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 1 (2006), 50–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A.; Böckenholt, U.; and Goodman, J. Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, 2 (2015), 333–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A., and Hamilton, R. Assortment size and option attractiveness in consumer choice among retailers. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 3 (2009), 410–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, E.K.; Jin, F.; Ren, F.; Wang, Y.; and Wilson, J. The special challenges of ecommerce in china: A preliminary investigation of sufficient conditions for generating adequate consumer trust for initial launch. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (2012), 4562–4571.
   Google Scholar
• Dellaert, B.G.C., and Häubl, G. Searching in choice mode: Consumer decision processes in product search with recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 2 (2012), 277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R. Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 2 (1997), 215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R. Context and task effects on choice deferral. Marketing Letters, 8, 1 (1997), 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar, R., and Sherman, S.J. The effect of common and unique features in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 3 (1996), 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R., and Simonson, I. The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 2 (2003), 146–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia, U.M.; Gopinath, M.; Bagozzi, R.P.; and Nataraajan, R. The role of regulatory focus in the experience and self‐control of desire for temptations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 2 (2006), 163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, K.; Kornish, L.J.; and Lynch, J.G. Smart agents: When lower search costs for quality information increase price sensitivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 6 (2003), 56–71.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, K., and Poynor, C. Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 2 (2010), 312–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev, T., and Hart, P. Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10, 2 (2006), 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu, S.A.; Machleit, K.A.; and Davis, L.M. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research, 54, 2 (2001), 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J.K., and Malkoc, S.A. Choosing here and now versus there and later: The moderating role of psychological distance on assortment size preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 4 (2012), 751–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourville, J.T., and Soman, D. Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24, 3 (2005), 382–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasti, K., and Ross, W.T. How inferences about missing attributes decrease the tendency to defer choice and increase purchase probability. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 5 (2008), 823–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, H., and Frensch, P.A. The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 3 (1996), 304–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häubl, G., and Murray, K.B. Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: The role of electronic recommendation agents. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 1–2 (2003), 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, G.A. Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: The effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing, 26, 3 (2009), 204–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y.; Guo, X.; and Chen, G. Assortment size and performance of online sellers: An inverted U-shaped relationship. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 10 (2019), 1503–1530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herek, G.M.; Janis, I.L.; and Huth, P. Decision making during international crises: is quality of process related to outcome? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 2 (1987), 203–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E.T. How self‐regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 3 (2012), 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, N.; Bose, I.; Gao, Y.; and Liu, L. Manipulation in digital word-of-mouth: A reality check for book reviews. Decision Support Systems, 50, 3 (2011), 627–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, G.; Iyengar, S.S.; and Jiang, W. Defined contribution pension plans: determinants of participation and contributions rates. Journal of Financial Services Research, 31, 1 (2007), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, J.J. The role of sensory-specific satiety in attribute-level variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1 (2001), 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M.S. Understanding online shopping scenario: Discussion on B2C context in Dhaka city. European Journal of Business and Management, 10, 14 (2018), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S.S., and Lepper, M.R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 6 (2000), 995–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S.S.; Wells, R.E.; and Schwartz, B. Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 2 (2006), 143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2004), 111–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, B.E. Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2, 3 (1995), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, B.E., and Lehmann, D.R. Modeling choice among assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67, 3 (1991), 274–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, B.; Moore, W.L.; and Glazer, R. Experiments in constrained choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 1 (1987), 96–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and Snell, J. Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 3 (1992), 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Ketcham, J.D.; Lucarelli, C.; Miravete, E.J.; and Roebuck, M.C. Sinking, swimming, or learning to swim in Medicare Part D. The American Economic Review, 102, 6 (2012), 2639–2673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.Y.; Shin, Y.; and Han, S. The reconstruction of choice value in the brain: A look into the size of consideration sets and their affective consequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 4 (2014), 810–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson, B.; Rick, S.; Wimmer, G.E.; Prelec, D.; and Loewenstein, G. Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53, 1 (2007), 147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D.M. A representation theorem for” preference for flexibility”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1979), 565–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassaline, M.E., and Logan, G.D. Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 3 (1993), 561–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D.; Kauffman, R.J.; and Bergen, M. Image effects and rational inattention in internet-based selling. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 4 (2009), 127–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and Hong, I.B. Consumer’s electronic word-of-mouth adoption: The trust transfer perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23, 4 (2019), 595–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levav, J., and Zhu, R. Seeking freedom through variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 4 (2009), 600–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R.J.; McAllister, D.J.; and Bies, R.J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 (1998), 438–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G.D., and Etherton, J.L. What is learned during automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 5 (1994), 1022–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G.D., and Klapp, S.T. Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 2 (1991), 179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luqman, A.; Cao, X.; Ali, A.; Masood, A.; and Yu, L. Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm. Computers in Human Behavior, 70(2017), 544–555.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Does greater online assortment pay? An empirical study using matched online and catalog shoppers. Journal of Retailing, 92, 3 (2016), 373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkoc, S.A.; Hedgcock, W.; and Hoeffler, S. Between a rock and a hard place: The failure of the attraction effect among unattractive alternatives. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 3 (2013), 317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, L.; Burnett, P.; Radford, M.; and Ford, S. The Melbourne decision making questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 1 (1997), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., and J. A. Russell. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Mogilner, C.; Rudnick, T.; and Iyengar, S.S. The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 2 (2008), 202–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C.; and Runger, G.C. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. New York: Wiley, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Morrin, M.; Broniarczyk, S.; Inman, J.J.; and Broussard, J. Saving for retirement: The effects of fund assortment size and investor knowledge on asset allocation strategies. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42, 2 (2008), 206–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray K B, Häubl G. Personalization without interrogation: Towards more effective interactions between consumers and feature-based recommendation agents. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 2 (2009), 138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novemsky, N.; Dhar, R.; Schwarz, N.; and Simonson, I. Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 3 (2007), 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbrich, R., and Holsing, C. Modeling consumer purchasing behavior in social shopping communities with clickstream data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 2 (2011), 15–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppewal, H., and Koelemeijer, K. More choice is better: Effects of assortment size and composition on assortment evaluation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2, 1 (2005), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J.W.; Bettman, J.R.; and Johnson, E.J. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 1 (1992), 87–131.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R.S.; Owens, P.D.; Tetlock, P.E.; Fan, E.T.; and Martorana, P. Group dynamics in top management teams: Groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of organizational failure and success. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 2–3 (1998), 272–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, R.K.; Kahn, B.E.; and Kahneman, D. Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1 (1999), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reibstein, D.J.; Youngblood, S.A.; and Fromkin, H.L. Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 4 (1975), 434–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutskaja, E., and Hogarth, R.M. Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate.” Psychology and Marketing, 26, 3 (2009), 197–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutskaja, E.; Camerer, C.; Nagel, R.; and Rangel, A. Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. American Economic Review, 101, 2 (2011), 900–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutskaja, E.; Lindner, A.; Nagel, R.; Andersen, R.A.; and Colin, F.C. Choice overload reduces neural signatures of choice set value in dorsal striatum and anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 12 (2018), 925–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J.H., and Lattin, J.M. Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 4 (1991), 429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N.J.; Hur, T.; and Pennington, G.L. Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 6 (1999), 1109–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roney, C.J.; Higgins, E.T.; and Shah, J. Goals and framing: How outcome focus influences motivation and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 11 (1995), 1151–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibehenne, B.; Greifeneder, R.; and Todd, P. M. What moderates the too‐much‐choice effect? Psychology and Marketing, 26, 3 (2009), 229–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibehenne, B.; Greifeneder, R.; and Todd, P. M. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 3 (2010), 409–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B.; Ward, A.; Monterosso, J.; Lyubomirsky, S.; White, K.; and Lehman, D. R. Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 5 (2002), 1178–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B., and Ward, A. Doing better but feeling worse: The paradox of choice. Linley, P.A., and Joseph, S. Positive Psychology in Practice. New York: Wiley, 2012, 86–105.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S.V., and Walsham, G. Reconceptualizing and managing reputation risk in the knowledge economy: Toward reputable action. Organization Science, 16, 3 (2005), 308–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sela, A.; Berger, J.; and Liu, W. Variety, vice, and virtue: How assortment size influences option choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 6 (2009), 941–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A.M., and Wolford, G. Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychological Science, 18, 5 (2007), 369–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staddon, J., and Chow, R. Detecting reviewer bias through web-based association mining. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web, (2008), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Su, B. Characteristics of consumer search on-line: How much do we search? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 1 (2008), 109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P.E. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (1992), 331–376.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekouras, D. The effect of rating scale design on extreme response tendency in consumer product ratings. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21, 2 (2017), 270–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan Pham, M., and Chang, H.H. Regulatory focus, regulatory fit, and the search and consideration of choice alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 4 (2010), 626–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herpen, E., and Pieters, R. The variety of an assortment: An extension to the attribute-based approach. Marketing Science, 21, 3 (2002), 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q.; Du, W.; Ma, J.; and Liao, X. Recommendation mechanism for patent trading empowered by heterogeneous information networks. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23, 2 (2019), 147–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A., and Maier, E. Reducing competitive research shopping with cross-channel delivery. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 1 (2020), 78–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J.M.; Malhotra, D.; and Murnighan, J.K. Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26(2004), 75–101.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, M.S., and Pavlou, P.A. Marketing in computer-mediated environments: Research synthesis and new directions. Journal of Marketing, 78, 1 (2014), 20–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, R., and Meyers-Levy, J. Exploring the cognitive mechanism that underlies regulatory focus effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 1 (2007), 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar