Does Scarcity Add Value in Influencing Consumers in the Try-Before-You-Buy Model?

References

• Abosag, I.; Ramadan, Z. B.; Baker, T.; and Jin, Z. Customers’ need for uniqueness theory versus brand congruence theory: The impact on satisfaction with social network sites. Journal of Business Research, 117 (2020), 862–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aday, J. B.; and Phelan, K.V. Competitive advantage or market saturation: An in-depth comparison of flash-sale sites through content analysis. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 24, 3(2015),287–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adityan, H.; Harikrishnan, K.; Anand, S. J. J.; and Saju, B. Innovativeness and uniqueness as motivations for online shopping tendency and the mediating role of information acquisition. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 13, 1 (2017), 30–51.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Urreta, M. I.; and Hu, J. Detecting common method bias: Performance of the Harman’s single-factor test. ACM SIGMIS Database: The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 50, 2 (2019), 45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ariffin, S. K.; Mohan, T.; and Goh, Y. N. Influence of consumers’ perceived risk on consumers’ online purchase intention. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12, 3 (2018), 309–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, R. U. Resources, scarcity, technology, and growth. In R. D. Simpson, M. A. Toman, and R. U. Ayres (eds.), Scarcity and Growth Revisited. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2005, pp. 142–154.
   Google Scholar
• Babin, B. J.; Chebat, J. C.; and Michon, R. Perceived appropriateness and its effect on quality, affect and behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11, 5 (2004), 287–298.
   Google Scholar
• Babin, B. J.; Darden, W. R.; Griffin, M.; and Darden, R. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 4 (1994), 644–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J.; Parasuraman, A.; Grewal, D.; and Voss, G. B. The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of Marketing, 66, 2 (2002), 120–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkho, G. Why more brands are offering try-before-you-buy options. https://www.modernretail.co/startups/why-more-brands-are-offering-try-before-you-buy-options (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Bellizzi, J. A.; and Hite, R. E. Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood. Psychology & Marketing, 9, 5 (1992), 347–363.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, Q.; and Forsythe, S. Purchase intention for luxury brands: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, 65, 10 (2012), 1443–1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, P. J.; Kim, H.; and Lathrop, E. S. The relationship between price and quality in durable product categories with private label brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27, 6 (2018), 647–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, S.; and Gligor, D. Scarcity (versus popularity) cues for rejected customers: The impact of social exclusion on cue types through need for uniqueness. Journal of Business Research, 99(2019), 275–281.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M.; Pope, N.; and Voges, K. Buying or browsing? An exploration of shopping orientations and online purchase intention. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 11/12 (2003), 1666–1684.
   Google Scholar
• Brylla, D.; and Walsh, G. Scene Sells: Why spatial backgrounds outperform isolated product depictions online. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 4 (2020), 497–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L.; and Williams, L. J. Structural equation modeling (SEM): An introduction to basic techniques and advanced issues. In R. A. Swanson and E. F. Holton III (eds.), Research in Organizations: Foundations and Methods of Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berett-Koehler, 2005, pp. 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. M.; Moore, M.; and Fairhurst, A. E. Consumer shopping value for retail brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9, 1 (2005), 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, H.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.; and Park, K. Impact of product characteristics of limited edition shoes on perceived value, brand trust, and purchase intention; Focused on the scarcity message frequency. Journal of Business Research, 120(2020), 398–406.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C.; Berger, J.; and Van Boven, L. Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 3 (2012), 561–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T.-Z.; and Wildt, A. R. Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 1 (1994), 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chebat, J. C.; Haj-Salem, N.; and Oliveira, S. Why shopping pals make malls different? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21, 2 (2014), 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N.; and Yang, Y. The impact of customer experience on consumer purchase intention in cross-border e-commerce—Taking network structural embeddedness as mediator variable. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59 (2021), 102344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. F. S.; Monroe, K. B.; and Lou, Y. C. The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74, 3 (1998), 353–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H.; Hsu, I. C.; and Lin, C. C. Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Business Research, 63, 9–10 (2010), 1007–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, H.; Yeh, H. R.; and Tsai, Y. C. The influences of perceived value on consumer purchase intention: the moderating effect of advertising endorser. Journal of International Management Studies, 6, 1 (2011), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L.; Carr, C. L.; Peck, J.; and Carson, S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 4 (2001), 511–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. M.; Hsu, M. H.; Lai, H.; and Chang, C. M. Re-examining the influence of trust on online repeat purchase intention: The moderating role of habit and its antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 53, 4(2012), 835–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. M.; Wang, E. T.; Fang, Y. H.; and Huang, H. Y. Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24, 1 (2014), 85–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, P. N. 6 Trends shaping the future of the $532B beauty business. https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2019/09/01/6-trends-shaping-the-future-of-the-532b-beauty-business (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S.; Hagerty, M.; and Gerstner, E. Return policies and the optimal level of “hassle.” Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 5 (1998), 445–460.
   Google Scholar
• Dellaert, B. G.; and Stremersch, S. Marketing mass-customized products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 2 (2005), 219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demangeot, C.; and Broderick, A. J. Conceptualising consumer behaviour in online shopping environments. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35, 11 (2007), 878–894.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, K. R. Limited edition packaging: objectives, implementations and related marketing mix decisions of a scarcity product tactic. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37, 6 (2020), 617–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K.; and Simpson, B. Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risky lottery. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 3 (2010), 159–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. Z. How the try before you buy option can impact your online business. https://www.shipstation.com/blog/considering-try-before-you-buy (accessed on January 15, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C.; and Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, T. Warby Parker grew to $250 million in sales through disciplined growth. Now it’s time to get aggressive. https://www.inc.com/magazine/201706/tom-foster/warby-parker-eyewear.html (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Franke, N.; and Schreier, M. Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Marketing Letters, 19, 2 (2008), 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, H. L.; and Snyder, C. L. The search for uniqueness and valuation of scarcity. In K. J. Gergen (ed.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Plenum, 1980, pp. 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. M.; Simmering, M. J.; Atinc, G.; Atinc, Y.; and Babin, B. J. Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69, 8 (2016), 3192–3198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallino, S.; and Moreno, A. Integration of online and offline channels in retail: The impact of sharing reliable inventory availability information. Management Science, 60, 6 (2014), 1434–1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido-Morgado, Á.; González-Benito, Ó.; Martos-Partal, M.; and Campo, K. Which products are more responsive to in-store displays: Utilitarian or hedonic? Journal of Retailing, 97, 3 (2021), 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, X.; Cheung, C. M.; Zhang, K. Z.; Chen, C.; and Lee, M. K. Cross-side network effects, brand equity, and consumer loyalty: Evidence from mobile payment market. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 3 (2020), 279–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr.: Howard, M. C.; and Nitzl, C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(2020), 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hajli, N.; Sims, J.; Zadeh, A. H.; and Richard, M. O. A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71(2017), 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, P.; and Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65, 9 (2012), 1254–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, B. Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 4 (2010), 597–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D.; Paolacci, G.; and Chandler, J. Common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool: Evidence and solutions. In F. R. Kardes, P. M. Herr, and N. Schwarz (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Consumer Psychology. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019, pp. 319–337.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, J.; and Matt, C. Reducing the service deficit in m-commerce: How service-technology fit can support digital sales of complex products. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 22, 3 (2018), 386–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz-Spahn, S. Cross-channel free-riding consumer behavior in a multichannel environment: An investigation of shopping motives, sociodemographics and product categories. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 6 (2013), 570–578.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, L.; and Chen, Y. J. Return policy: Hassle-free or your money-back guarantee? Naval Research Logistics, 61, 5 (2014), 403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-L.; and Lin, J. C.-C. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45, 1 (2008), 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z.; and Bai, P. Dynamic cooperative promotion in the presence of consumer reference effect with competing retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60 (2021), 102441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, C.; and Tingley, D. “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research and Politics, 2, 3 (2015), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultén, P.; and Vanyushyn, V. Promotion and shoppers’ impulse purchases: The example of clothes. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31, 2 (2014), 94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, B.; and Aljarah, A. Dataset of relationships among social media marketing activities, brand loyalty, revisit intention. Evidence from the hospitality industry in Northern Cyprus. Data in Brief, 21(2018), 1823–1828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janakiraman, N.; and Ordóñez, L. Effect of effort and deadlines on consumer product returns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 2 (2012), 260–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, P. The role of brand name in customization decisions: A search vs experience perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13, 2 (2004), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. A.; Reynolds, K. E.; and Arnold, M. J. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59, 9 (2006), 974–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S.; and Jin, B. A theoretical investigation of slow fashion: sustainable future of the apparel industry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38, 5 (2014), 510–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari, B.; and Atulkar, S. Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31(2016), 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. J.; and Hwang, Y. A study of mobile internet user’s service quality perceptions from a user’s utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives. Information Systems Frontiers, 14, 2 (2012), 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.W.; Gupta, S.; and Koh, J. Investigating the intention to purchase digital items in social networking communities: A customer value perspective. Information & Management, 48, 6 (2011), 228–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.; Kang, S.; and Lee, K.H. How social capital impacts the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117(2020), 596–603.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. C.; Schilhavy, R. A.; Chowa, C.; and Chin, W. W. Do customers identify with our website? The effects of website identification on repeat purchase intention. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 3 (2016), 319–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K.; and Melnyk, V. Speaking to the mind or the heart: Effects of matching hedonic versus utilitarian arguments and products. Marketing Letters, 27, 1 (2016), 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, H. H.; Kuo, C. C.; Yang, Y. T.; and Chung, T. S. Decision-contextual and individual influences on scarcity effects. European Journal of Marketing, 47, 8 (2013), 1314–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A.; Lee, H. J.; and Kim, Y. K. Indian consumers’ purchase intention toward a United States versus local brand. Journal of Business Research, 62, 5 (2009), 521–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J.; Abbasi, A.; Cheema, A.; and Abraham, L. B. Path to purpose? How online customer journeys differ for hedonic versus utilitarian purchases. Journal of Marketing, 84, 4 (2020), 127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. C.; Bruning, P. F.; and Swarna, H. Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services. Business Horizons, 61, 3 (2018), 431–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.; Zhang, J.; and Cheng, T. C. E. Optimal pricing and return policy and the value of freight insurance for a retailer facing heterogeneous consumers with uncertain product values. International Journal of Production Economics, 229 (2020), 107767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, K. C.; Chai, L. T.; and Piew, T. H. The effects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers’ online purchase intention. International Business Research, 3, 3 (2010), 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. The long-term impact of loyalty programs on consumer purchase behavior and loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 71, 4 (2007), 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L. C., Chang, W. P., and Chang, H. H. Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 34(2014), 258–266.
   Google Scholar
• Lunden, I. TryNow raises $12M to bring try-before-you-buy, Prime Wardrobe as a service to online retailers. https://techcrunch.com/2021/03/22/trynow-raises-12m-to-bring-try-before-you-buy-amazon-wardrobe-as-a-service-to-online-retailers (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. Scarcity’s enhancement of desirability: The role of naive economic theories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 1 (1992), 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathwick, C.; Malhotra, N.; and Rigdon, E. Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77, 1 (2001), 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer, J. Try before you buy: The next big thing in ecommerce? https://www.shipstation.com/blog/try-before-you-buy (accessed on October 2, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Morad, R. Try-before-you-buy programs: What are they and 4 examples for retailers to follow. https://www.shopify.com/retail/try-before-you-buy-programs (accessed on November 27, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S. K.; and Setoputro, R. Optimal return policy and modular design for build-to-order products. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 5 (2005), 496–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, C. S. P. Intention to purchase on social commerce websites across cultures: A cross-regional study. Information & Management, 50, 8 (2013), 609–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oghazi, P.; Karlsson, S.; Hellström, D.; and Hjort, K. Online purchase return policy leniency and purchase decision: Mediating role of consumer trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41(2018), 190–200.
   Google Scholar
• Orendorff, A. The state of the ecommerce fashion industry: Statistics, trends & strategy. https://www.shopify.com/enterprise/ecommerce-fashion-industry (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Overby, J. W.; and Lee, E. J. The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59, 10–11 (2006), 1160–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkara, B. Y.; Ozmen, M.; and Kim, J. W. Examining the effect of flow experience on online purchase: A novel approach to the flow theory based on hedonic and utilitarian value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37(2017), 119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C. J.; and Wang, H. Examining hedonic and utilitarian motivations for m-commerce fashion retail app engagement. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20, 4 (2016), 487–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, A. L. What determines buyer‐seller relationship quality? An investigation from the buyer’s perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38, 1 (2002), 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. Stitch Fix announces fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2020 financial results. https://investors.stitchfix.com/news-releases/news-release-details/stitch-fix-announces-fourth-quarter-and-full-fiscal-year-2020 (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Peng, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; and Liang, S. Moderating effects of time pressure on the relationship between perceived value and purchase intention in social E-commerce sales promotion: Considering the impact of product involvement. Information & Management, 56, 2 (2019), 317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picot-Coupey, K.; Krey, N.; Huré, E.; and Ackermann, C. L. Still work and/or fun? Corroboration of the hedonic and utilitarian shopping value scale. Journal of Business Research, 126(2021), 578–590.
   Google Scholar
• Radhi, M.; and Zhang, G. Optimal cross-channel return policy in dual-channel retailing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 210(2019), 184–198.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, T.; Terwiesch, C.; and Ulrich, K. T. Principles for user design of customized products. California Management Review, 47, 4 (2005), 68–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, S.; Griffis, S. E.; and Goldsby, T. J. Failure to deliver? Linking online order fulfillment glitches with future purchase behavior. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 7–8 (2011), 692–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scapri, D. Fashion stores between fun and usefulness. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10, 1 (2006), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbandeh, M. U.S. apparel market—Statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/965/apparel-market-in-the-us (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Shang, G.; Ghosh, B. P.; and Galbreth, M. R. Optimal retail return policies with wardrobing. Production and Operations Management, 26, 7 (2017), 1315–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X.; Li, F.; and Chumnumpan, P. The use of product scarcity in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 54, 2 (2020), 380–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, H. P.; Lai, K. H.; and Cheng, T. E. Informational and relational influences on electronic word of mouth: An empirical study of an online consumer discussion forum. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 4 (2013), 137–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, I.; and Nowlis, S. M. The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 1 (2000), 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R.; and Fromkin, H. L. Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 5 (1977), 518–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, B. C. Consumer e-tailer choice strategies at on-line shopping comparison sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11, 3 (2007), 135–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, L.; and Laroche, M. Building and testing models of consumer purchase intention in competitive and multicultural environments. Journal of Business Research, 60, 3 (2007), 260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, K. T.; Bearden, W. O.; and Hunter, G. L. Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1 (2001), 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, T.; and Van Dolen, W. Online purchase intentions: A multi-channel store image perspective. Information & Management, 46, 2 (2009), 77–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinhas, A. S.; and Bowman, D. Online/offline information search patterns and outcomes for services. Journal of Services Marketing, 33, 7 (2019), 753–770.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Yu, Y.; and Li, O. The typeface curvature effect: The role of typeface curvature in increasing preference toward hedonic products. Psychology & Marketing, 37, 8 (2020), 1118–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Feng, H.; and Feng, N. Optimal release strategy for the competing software vendors based on word-of-mouth effect. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 1 (2020), 130–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 3 (1995), 171–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, H.; and Ramkumar, B. Who seeks a surprise box? Predictors of consumers’ use of fashion and beauty subscription-based online services (SOS). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41(2018), 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J.; Zhao, C.; Yan, X.; and Wang, L. An integrated randomized pricing strategy for omni-channel retailing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 3 (2020), 391–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. I.; and Chen, Y. J. The impact of green marketing and perceived innovation on purchase intention for green products. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6, 5 (2014), 81.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. Y.; Lu, H. Y.; Wu, Y. Y.; and Fu, C. S. The effects of product scarcity and consumers’ need for uniqueness on purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 3 (2012), 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.; Xin, L.; Li, D.; Yu, J.; and Guo, J. How does scarcity promotion lead to impulse purchase in the online market? A field experiment. Information & Management, 58, 1 (2021), 103283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X.; and Jackson, J. E. Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing. International Journal of Production Economics, 216(2019), 118–132.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoman, I.; and McMahon-Beattie, U. Luxury markets and premium pricing. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 4, 4 (2006), 319–328.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. How retailers are transforming the try-before-you-buy experience. https://squareup.com/us/en/townsquare/try-before-you-buy-trends (accessed on May 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C.; and Bastin, M. Hedonic shopping value and impulse buying behavior in transitional economies: A symbiosis in the Mainland China marketplace. Journal of Brand Management, 18, 2 (2010), 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, C.; Moon, H.; Wang, S.; Yu, X.; and Kim, K.H. Study on the influencing of B2B parasocial relationship on repeat purchase intention in the online purchasing environment: An empirical study of B2B E-commerce platform. Industrial Marketing Management, 92(2021), 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. Q.; and Kanjanamekanant, K. No trespassing: Exploring privacy boundaries in personalized advertisement and its effects on ad attitude and purchase intentions on social media. Information & Management, 58, 2 (2021), 103314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, L.; Filieri, R.; Rialti, R.; and Yoon, S. Unpacking the relationship between social media marketing and brand equity: The mediating role of consumers’ benefits and experience. Journal of Business Research, 117(2020), 256–267.
   Google Scholar