Does Age Matter? The Influence of Age on Response Rates in a Mixed-Mode Survey

References

• Angus, V. C., Entwistle, V. A., Emslie, M. J., Walker, K. A., & Andrew, J. E. (2003). The requirement for prior consent to participate on survey response rates: A population-based survey in Grampian. BMC Health Services Research, 3, 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bech, M., & Kristensen, M. B. (2009). Differential response rates in postal and Web-based surveys among older respondents. Survey Research Methods, 3, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, R., Freedman, M., & McGuckin, N. ( 2008, May). The challenge of surveying “hard to reach” groups. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport: Harmonisation and Data Quality, Annecy, France. Retrieved from http://www.travelbehavior.us/Nancy-pdfs/The%20Challenge%20of%20Surveying%20Hard%20to%20Reach%20Populations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Wilkins, B. T. (1978). Clues to reasons for nonresponse, and its effect upon variable estimates. Journal of Leisure Research, 10, 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caan, B., Hiatt, R. A., & Owen, A. M. (1991). Mailed dietary surveys: Response rates, error rates, and the effect of omitted food items on nutrient values. Epidemiology, 2, 430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, M. P., Blair, J., & Triplett, T. (1999). A comparison of mail and email for a survey of employees in U.S. statistical agencies. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cull, W. L., O’Connor, K. G., Sharp, S., & Tang, S. F. (2005). Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Services Research, 40, 213–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda, M. D., & Nobile, J. L. (2010). The fallacy of online surveys: No data are better than bad data. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 15, 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. R. (1996). Estimating the effect of nonresponse bias on angler surveys. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 125, 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, L. M. (2004). Fishing in South Dakota—2003: Fishing activity, harvest and angler opinion survey ( Report No. HD-6(1)-04.AMS). Pierre, SD: Game, Fish, and Parks Department, Division of Wildlife.
   Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, L. M. (2007). Fishing in South Dakota—2006: Special focus on the Black Hills (Annual, combination, senior, & jr. combination licenses) (Report No. HD-7-07.AMS). Pierre, SD: Game, Fish, and Parks Department, Division of Wildlife.
   Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, L. M. (2011). Comparison of an Internet versus mail survey: A case study. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, L. M., & Henderson, K. (2012). Fishing in South Dakota—2011: Resident annual fishing licenses. First year progress report: 2012–02. Brookings, SD: U.S. Geological Survey, South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State University.
   Google Scholar
• Goyder, J. (1986). Surveys on surveys: Limitations and potentials. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., Mowen, A., Covelli, E., & Trauntvein, N. (2011). Recreation participation and conservation attitudes: Differences between mail and online respondents in a mixed-mode survey. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. A., Holt, D., & Elton, P. J. (2002). Do postage-stamps increase response rates to postal surveys? A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 872–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, A. R., & Rogers, W. L. (1988). Age and response rates to interview survey samples. Journal of Gerontology, 43, S200–S205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutchison, P. D., Fleischmann, G. M., & Johnson, D. L. (2001). Email surveys: Additional research insights. The Review of Business Information Systems, 5, 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldenberg, D. O., Koenig, H., F., & Becker, B. W. (1994). Mail survey response rate patterns in a population of the elderly: Does response deteriorate with age? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalton, G., & Flores-Cervantes, I. (2003). Weighting methods. Journal of Official Statistics, 19, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2005). A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, N., & Radler, B. (2002). A comparison between mail and Web surveys: Response pattern, respondent profile, and data quality. Journal of Official Statistics, 18, 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, C., Delclos, G. L., Burau, K., Drawhorn, D. D., & Aday, L. A. (2007). Mail versus Internet surveys: Determinants of method of response preferences among health professionals. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 30, 186–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. L., & Tarnai, J. (2002). Evaluating nonresponse error in mail surveys. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little ( Eds.), Survey nonresponse ( pp. 197–211). New York: NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, K. (2010). Methodological considerations in surveys of older adults: Technology matters. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 8, 114–133.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, N. R., Miller, H. M., & Dietsch, A. M. (2011). Appropriate uses and considerations for online surveying in human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 154–163.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, H., Graham, C., Pothecary, N., & Rasul, F. ( 2007). Increasing response rates amongst black and minority ethic and seldom heard groups: A review of literature relevant to the national acute patients’ survey. Oxford, UK: Picker Institute Europe. Retrieved from http://www.nhssurveys.org/Filestore/documents/Increasing_response_rates_literature_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Truell, A. D., Bartlett, J. E., II, & Alexander, M. W. (2002). Response rate, speed, and completeness: A comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 46–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J. (2011). Advantages and disadvantages of Internet surveys: Introduction to the special issue. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 149–153.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., Jacobs, M. J., Sijtsma, M. T. J., & Beaman, J. (2011). Can weighting compensate for sampling issues in Internet surveys? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 200–215.
   Google Scholar