Urban and Rural Attitudes Toward Endangered Species Conservation in the Canadian Prairies: Drawing Lessons From the American ESA

References

• Adler, J. H. (2011). Rebuilding the ark: New perspectives on Endangered Species Act reform. Washington, DC: AEI.
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H., Spencer, H., Oates, W. E. & Sanchirico, N. (2010). Success and design of local referenda for land conservation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(4), 769–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, M. J. (1998). The Endangered Species Act and private land: Four lessons learned from the past quarter century. Environmental Law Reporter, 28(12), 10701–10710.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. (2000). Preserving biodiversity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnie, R. (1999). Endangered species mitigation banking: Promoting recovery through habitat conservation planning under the Endangered Species Act. The Science of the Total Environment, 240, 11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, A., Zint, M., & De Young, R. (2003). Landowners’ responses to an Endangered Species Act listing and implications for encouraging conservation. Conservation Biology, 17, 1638–1649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyneel, S. (2010). Shared landscape, divergent visions? Transboundary environment management in the Northern Great Plains. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard, H. H., Paterson, T., Wandschneider, R. R., & Ohler, A. M. (2008). Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics, 84, 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, J. L., Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Ruyle, G. B., & Brunson, M. (2007). Forest Service grazing permittee perceptions of the Endangered Species Act in southeastern Arizona. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 60, 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech, B., & Krausman P. R. (1999). Public opinion on endangered species conservation and policy. Society & Natural Resources, 12, 469–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmendorf, C. S. (2003). Ideas, incentives, gifts and governance: Toward conservation stewardship of private land, in cultural and psychological perspective. University of Illinois Law Review, 2, 423–505.
   Google Scholar
• Farrier, D. (1995). Conserving biodiversity on private land: Incentives for management or compensation for lost expectations? Harvard Environmental Law Review, 19, 303–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Governments of Canada. (2014). 2012 Canadian Nature Survey: Awareness, participation, and expenditures in nature-based recreation, conservation, and subsistence activities. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Councils of Resource Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Biodiversity Working Group (FTP). (2013). Draft Biodiversity Goals & Targets for Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. (2003). Towards smart growth? The difficult implementation of alternatives to urban dispersion. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 12, 48–70.
   Google Scholar
• Freyfogle, E. T., & Goble, D. D. (2009). Wildlife law: A primer. Covelo, CA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, N. (2011). Lawscape: Property, environment, law. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, A. E., Reed M., & Davis, S. K. (2014). Voluntary stewardship and the Canadian Species at Risk Act: Exploring rancher willingness to support species at risk in the Canadian prairies. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, V. (2009). Reauthorizing the Endangered Species Act in favor of wildlife and wild lands: An inevitable result of narrative changes in twenty-first century America? Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 24, 323–342.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, K., & McLeod, D. (2002). Property rights and public interests: A Wyoming agricultural lands study. Growth and Change, 33, 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipsos Reid. (2012). Three in five Canadians (62%) say the federal government is doing too little to protect species at risk. Retrieved from http://www.ecojustice.ca/pressrelease/3-in-5-canadians-say-federal-government-doing-too-little-to-protect-endangered-species/
   Google Scholar
• International Union for the Conservation of Natura (IUCN). (2011). Wildlife in a changing world. Gland, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson-Smith, D., Kreuter, U., & Krannich, R. S. 2005. Understanding the multidimensionality of property rights orientations: Evidence from Utah and Texas ranchers. Society & Natural Resources, 18(7), 587–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, U., Nair, M. Vi., Jackson-Smith, D., Conner, J. R., & Johnston, J. E. (2006). Property rights orientations and rangeland management objectives: Texas, Utah, and Colorado. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 59(6), 632–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabii, T., & Horwitz, P. (2006). A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes. Environmental Conservation, 33(1), 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langpap, C. (2004). Conservation incentives programs for endangered species: An analysis of landowner participation. Land Economics, 80, 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueck, D., & Michael J. A. (2003). Preemptive habitat destruction under the Endangered Species Act. Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 27–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuser, E., Harshaw, H. W., & Mooers, A. O. (2009). Public preference for endemism over other conservation-relation species attributes. Conservation Biology, 23(4), 1041–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. R., & Hobbs, R. J. (2002). Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology, 16, 330–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. R. (2007). Trading species: A new direction for habitat trading programs. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 32, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Olive, A. (2014a). Land, stewardship and legitimacy: Endangered species policy in Canada and the United States. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olive, A. (2014b). Urban awareness and attitudes toward conservation: A first look at Canadian cities. Applied Geography, 54, 160–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, A., & Minichiello, A. (2013). Wild things in urban places: America’s largest cities and multi-scales of governance for endangered species conservation. Applied Geography, 43, 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, G. M., & Shogren, J. F. (2003). Evaluating incentive mechanisms for conserving habitat. Natural Resources Journal, 43, 1093–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. R. (1991). Telling the farmers’ story: Competing responses to soil conservation rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, L., & Olive, A. (2010). Reconciling norm conflict in endangered species conservation on private lands. Natural Resources Journal, 50, 431–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. R. (2003). Win-win ecology: How earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, J. L. (1997). The ecosystem approach: New departures for land and water, closing remarks. Ecology and Law Quarterly, 24, 883–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, J. F. and Tschirhart, J. (Eds.). (2001). Protecting endangered species in The United States: Biological needs, political realities and economic choices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smallwood, K. (2003). A guide to Canada’s Species at Risk Act. Ontario, Canada: Sierra Legal Defense Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. W. (2008). The performance of the Endangered Species Act. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 39(1), 279–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2014). 2011 Census of Population: Population, urban and rural, by province and territory (Canada). Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo62a-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stern, S. (2006). Encouraging conservation on private lands: A behavioral analysis of financial incentives. Arizona Law Review, 48, 541–592.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S., McCann, E., De Young, R., & Erickson, D. (1996). Farmers’ attitudes about farming and the environment: A survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 9, 123–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2012). Endangered species of the mountain-prairie region. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/endspp/
   Google Scholar
• Wilcove, D. S., & Lee, J. (2004). Using economic and regulatory incentives to restore endangered species: Lessons learned from three new programs. Conservation Biology, 18, 640–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar