Qualitative Measures of Wildlife Value Orientations with a Diverse Population in New York City

References

• Adenle, A. (2012). Failure to achieve 2010 biodiversity’s target in developing countries: How can conservation help? Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 2435–2442. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0325-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, A. D., Manfredo, M. J., & Fulton, D. C. (2000). Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 218–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B., Teel, T., & Newman, P. (2009). Response to “More kids in the woods: Reconnecting Americans with nature.” Journal of Forestry, 107, 378–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B. L., Billingsley, E., & O’Day, L. (2009). A closer examination of barriers to participation in informal science education for Latinos and Caucasians. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science, 14, 431–445.
   Google Scholar
• Champ, J. G. (2002). A culturalist-qualitative investigation of wildlife media and value orientations. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 273–286. doi:10.1080/10871200214755
   Google Scholar
• Chase, L. D., Teel, T. L., Thornton-Chase, M. R., & Manfredo, M. J. (2015). A comparison of quantitative and qualitative methods to measure wildlife value orientations among diverse audiences: A case study of Latinos in the American Southwest. Society & Natural Resources, 1–16. Online. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1086455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. N., Fly, J. M., Buehler, D. A., & Evans, R. M. (1994). Focus group interviewing for human dimensions of wildlife research. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 48, 604–611.
   Google Scholar
• Dayer, A. A., Stinchfield, H. M., & Manfredo, M. J. (2007). Stories about wildlife: Developing an instrument for identifying wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12, 307–315. doi:10.1080/10871200701555410
   Google Scholar
• Deruiter, D. S., & Donnelly, M. (2002). A qualitative approach to measuring determinants of wildlife value orientations. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 251–271. doi:10.1080/10871200214754
   Google Scholar
• Derviçoglu, S. (2010). Wildlife value orientations of university students. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 6, 593–598.
   Google Scholar
• DiCamillo, J. A. (1995). Focus groups as a tool for fish and wildlife management: A case study. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23, 616–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, N., Voβ, C., & Menzel, S. (2013). Wildlife value orientations as predicting factors in support of reintroducing bison and of wolves migrating to Germany. Journal of Nature Conservation, 21, 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, T. M., Schüttler, E., Benavides, P., Gálvez, N., Söhn, L., & Palomo, N. (2013). Values, animal symbolism, and human-animal relationships associated to two threatened felids in Mapuche and Chilean local narratives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 9, 41–56. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-9-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 638–646. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, G., Schuhmann, A., & Brown, H. (2009). More kids in the woods: Reconnecting Americans with nature. Journal of Forestry, 107, 373–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., & Nair, V. (2013). Determining the wildlife value orientation (WVO): A case study of lower Kinabatangan, Sabah. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 5, 377–387. doi:10.1108/WHATT-03-2013-0014
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide to research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J. (2008). Who cares about wildlife: Social science concepts for understanding human-wildlife relationships and other conservation issues. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L., & Henry, K. L. (2009). Linking society and environment: A multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the western United States. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 407–427. doi:10.1111/ssqu.2009.90.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Ebers, V. (1997). Using monetary incentives with hard-to-reach populations in panel surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9, 77–86. doi:10.1093/ijpor/9.1.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Minnis, D. L., Holsman, R. H., Grice, L., & Payton, R. B. (1997). Focus groups as a human dimensions research tool: Three illustrations of their use. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2, 40–49. doi:10.1080/10871209709359107
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newing, H., Eagle, C., Puri, R., & Watson, C. W. (2011). Conducting research in conservation: A social science perspective. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Multiracial in America: Proud, diverse and growing in numbers. Retrieved from www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2015/06/2015-06-11_multiracial-in-america_final-updated.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2006). Student survey response rates across institutions: Why do they vary? Research in Higher Education, 47, 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8887-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottick, K. J., & Lerman, P. (1991). Maximizing survey response rates for hard-to -reach inner-city populations. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 172–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance theory. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 192–263New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, L., & Bech-Larsen, T. (2008). Hunters’ motivations and values: A South African perspective. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 252–262. doi:10.1080/10871200801986739
   Google Scholar
• Riepe, C., & Arlinghaus, R. (2014). Explaining anti-angling sentiments in the general population of Germany: An application of the cognitive hierarchy model. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 371–390. doi:10.1080/10871209.2014.918219
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409–432. doi:10.1023/A:1024232915870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, M. T., Vaske, J. J., & Jacobs, M. H. (2012). Acceptability of lethal control of wildlife that damage agriculture in the Netherlands. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 1308–1323. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.684850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W. (2007). Survey non-response procedures in cross-national perspective: The 2005 ISSR non-response survey. Survey Research Methods, 1, 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2009). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 24, 128–139. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teel, T. L., Manfredo, M. J., Jensen, F. S., Buijs, A. E., Fischer, A., Riepe, C. … Jacobs, M. H. (2010). Understanding the cognitive basis for human-wildlife relationships as a key to successful protected area management. International Journal of Sociology, 40, 104–123. doi:10.2753/IJS0020-7659400306
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P.E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 50, 819–827.
   Google Scholar
• Van Velsor, S. W., & Nilon, C. H. (2006). A qualitative investigation of the urban African-American and Latino adolescent experience with wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11, 359–370. doi:10.1080/10871200600894944
   Google Scholar