574
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Stakeholder Barriers and Benefits Associated With Improving Livestock Husbandry to Prevent Jaguar and Puma Depredation

&

References

  • Achterkamp, M. C., & Vos, J. F. (2008). Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 749–757. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.001
  • Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27, 629–649. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
  • Amador-Alcalá, S., Naranjo, E. J., & Jiménez-Ferrer, G. (2013). Wildlife predation on livestock and poultry: Implications for predator conservation in the rainforest of south-east Mexico. Oryx, 47, 243–250. doi:10.1017/S0030605311001359
  • Amit, R. (2016). Enhancing coexistence with jaguars and pumas in Costa Rica: Stakeholder analysis and design of community-based incentives ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  • Amit, R., Gordillo-Chavez, E. J., & Bone, R. (2013). Jaguar and puma attacks on livestock in Costa Rica. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 7, 77–84.
  • Andersen, B., & Fagerhaug, T. (2000). The nominal group technique. Quality Process, 33, 144.
  • Boddy, C. (2012). The nominal group technique: An aid to brainstorming ideas in research. Qualitative Market Research, 15, 6–18. doi:10.1108/13522751211191964
  • Bruskotter, J. T., Singh, A., Fulton, D. C., & Slagle, K. (2015). Assessing tolerance for wildlife: Clarifying relations between concepts and measures. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 255–270. doi:10.1080/10871209.2015.1016387
  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bulte, E. H., & Rondeau, D. (2005). Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 14–19. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0014:WCWDMB>2.0.CO;2
  • Carter, N. H., & Linnell, J. D. (2016). Mainstreaming coexistence with wildlife: Reply to Gallagher. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 818–819. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.007
  • Casey, F., Vickerman, S., Hummon, C., & Taylor, B. (2006). Incentives for biodiversity conservation: An ecological and economic assessment. Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.
  • Caso, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, C., Payan, E., Eizirik, E., De Oliveira, T., Leite-Pitman, R., … Valderrama, C. (2008). Panthera onca. In IUCN (2013), IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. Retrieved from www.iucnredlist.org
  • Cavalcanti, S., Marchini, S., Zimmermann, A., Gese, E., & Macdonald, D. (2010). Jaguar, livestock, and people in Brazil: Realities and perceptions behind the conflict. In D. Macdonald & A. Loveridge (Eds.), Biology and conservation of wild felids. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Chang’a, A., de Souza, N., Muya, J., Keyyu, J., Mwakatobe, L. M., Malugu, L., … Olson, D. (2016). Scaling-up the use of chili fences for reducing human-elephant conflict across landscapes in Tanzania. Tropical Conservation Science, 9, 921–930. doi:10.1177/194008291600900220
  • Corrales-Gutiérrez, D. (2016). Primer Informe de Labores 2013–2015. Unidad de Atención de Conflictos con Felinos (UACFel). San José, Costa Rica: UACFel /SINAC-Panthera
  • Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13, 458–466. doi:10.1111/acv.2010.13.issue-5
  • Dickman, A. J., Macdonald, E. A., & Macdonald, D. W. (2011). A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 13937–13944. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012972108
  • Dowdell, S., & Palminteri, S. (2016). Reducing human-wildlife conflict in the blink of a light. Mongabay Wildtech. Retrieved from https://wildtech.mongabay.com/2016/05/reducing-human-wildlife-conflict-blink-light/
  • Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29, 738–743. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1103388
  • Gough, I. (2015). The political economy of prevention. British Journal of Political Science, 45, 307–327. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000434
  • Hallowell, M. R., & Gambatese, J. A. (2009). Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136, 99–107. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137
  • Hoogesteijn, R., & Hoogesteijn, A. (2014). Anti-predation strategies for cattle ranches in Latin America: A guide. PANTHERA. Campo Grande, MS, Brazil: Eckograf Soluções Impressas.
  • Inskip, C., & Zimmermann, A. (2009). Human-felid conflict: A review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx, 43, 18–34. doi:10.1017/S003060530899030X
  • Jacobson, S. K. (2009). Communication skills for conservation professionals (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Jacobson, S. K., Gape, L., Sweeting, M., & Stein, T. V. (2005). Using a nominal group technique process to plan educational outreach for a Bahamas park. Applied Environmental Education and Conservation, 4, 305–316. doi:10.1080/15330150500302098
  • Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Conservation education and outreach techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401
  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Maclennan, S. D., Groom, R. J., Macdonald, D. W., & Frank, L. G. (2009). Evaluation of a compensation scheme to bring about pastoralist tolerance of lions. Biological Conservation, 142, 2419–2427. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.003
  • Marchini, S. (2014). Who’s in conflict with whom? Human dimensions of the conflicts involving wildlife. In L. M. Verdade, M. C. Lyra-Jorge, & C. I. Piña (Eds.), Applied ecology and human dimensions in biological conservation (pp. 189–209). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Marchini, S., & Macdonald, D. W. (2012). Predicting ranchers’ intention to kill jaguars: Case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal. Biological Conservation, 147, 213–221. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.002
  • Matiru, V., Hart, N., & Castro, P. (2000). Conflict and natural resource management. Rome, Italy: FAO-UN.
  • McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
  • McMillan, S. S., Kelly, F., Sav, A., Kendall, E., King, M. A., Whitty, J. A., & Wheeler, A. J. (2014). Using the nominal group technique: How to analyze across multiple groups. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 14, 92–108. doi:10.1007/s10742-014-0121-1
  • Morzillo, A. T., & Needham, M. D. (2015). Landowner incentives and normative tolerances for managing beaver impacts. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 514–530. doi:10.1080/10871209.2015.1083062
  • Mukherjee, N., Huge, J., Sutherland, W. J., McNeill, J., Van Opstal, M., Dahdouh‐Guebas, F., & Koedam, N. (2015). The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: Applications and guidelines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 1097–1109. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12387
  • Ndlovu, M., Devereux, E., Chieffe, M., Asklof, K., & Russo, A. (2016). Responses of African elephants towards a bee threat: Its application in mitigating human-elephant conflict. South African Journal of Science, 112, 1–5. doi:10.17159/sajs.2016/20150058
  • Nelson, F. (2009). Developing payments for ecosystem services approaches to carnivore conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14, 381–392. doi:10.1080/10871200903045228
  • Nielsen, C., Thompson, D., Kelly, M., & Lopez-Gonzalez, C. A. (2015). Puma concolor. In IUCN, Red List of Threatened Species 2015. Retrieved from www.iucnredlist.org
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Quigley, H., Hoogesteijn, R., Hoogesteijn, A., Foster, R., Payan, E., Corrales, D., … Urbina, Y. (2015). Observations and preliminary testing of jaguar depredation reduction techniques in and between core jaguar populations. Parks, 21, 63–72. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2014.PARKS-21-1HQ.en
  • Redpath, S. M., Bhatia, S., & Young, J. (2015). Tilting at wildlife: Reconsidering human–wildlife conflict. Oryx, 49, 222–225. doi:10.1017/S0030605314000799
  • Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
  • Rosas‐Rosas, O. C., & Valdez, R. (2010). The role of landowners in jaguar conservation in Sonora, Mexico. Conservation Biology, 24, 366–371. doi:10.1111/cbi.2010.24.issue-2
  • Sakurai, R., Jacobson, S. K., & Ueda, G. (2013). Public perceptions of risk and government performance regarding bear management in Japan. Ursus, 24, 70–82. doi:10.2192/URSUS-D-12-00011.1
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schultz, P. W. (2014). Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Lots of tools but few instructions. European Psychologist, 19, 107–117. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000163
  • Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H., & Earle, T. C. (2005). Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 145–156. doi:10.1080/1366987032000105315
  • Sorice, M. G., & Conner, R. (2010). Predicting private landowner intentions to enroll in an incentive program to protect endangered species. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 15, 77–89. doi:10.1080/10871200903551985
  • Steele, J. R., Rashford, B. S., Foulke, T. K., Tanaka, J. A., & Taylor, D. T. (2013). Wolf (Canis lupus) predation impacts on livestock production: Direct effects, indirect effects, and implications for compensation ratios. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 66, 539–544. doi:10.2111/REM-D-13-00031.1
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 523. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.523
  • Thomas, D. R. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
  • Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College, PA: Venture.
  • Wollenberg, E., López, C., & Anderson, J. (2005). Though all things differ: Pluralism as a basis for cooperation in forests. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  • Woodroffe, R., & Frank, L. (2005). Lethal control of African lions (Panthera leo): Local and regional population impacts. Animal Conservation, 8, 91–98. doi:10.1017/S1367943004001829
  • Zabel, A., & Roe, B. (2009). Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives. Ecological Economics, 69, 126–134. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.