Reviewing the role of aquaria as restorative settings: how subaquatic diversity in public aquaria can influence preferences, and human health and well-being

References

• Albrecht, G., Sartore, G.-M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(S1), S95–S98. doi:10.1080/10398560701701288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T., & Taylor, J. (2002). Why conservationists should heed Pokemon. Science, 295, 2367. doi:10.1126/science.295.5564.2367b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, S. B., Rasmussen, K. G., & Best, A. M. (2003). Effect of aquariums on electroconvulsive therapy patients. Anthrozoös, 16, 229–240. doi:10.2752/089279303786992071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batt, S. (2009). Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: A multivariate approach. Bioscience Horizons, 2, 180–190. doi:10.1093/biohorizons/hzp021
   Google Scholar
• Bejder, L., Samuels, A., Whitehead, H., Gales, N., Mann, J., Connor, R., & Krützen, M. (2006). Decline in relative abundance of bottlenose dolphins exposed to long-term disturbance. Conservation Biology, 20, 1791–1798. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00540.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. S., & Swasey, J. E. (1996). Perceived stress reduction in urban public gardens. HortTechnology, 6, 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207–1211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249–259. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4, 394–409. doi:10.3390/bs4040394
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. E., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10, 456. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118–136. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, W. (1970). The New York Aquarium book of the water word: A guide to representative fishes, aquatic invertebrates, reptiles, birds, and mammals (pp. 9–10). New York, USA: New York Zoological Society American Heritage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, K., & Gawlinski, A. (1995). Animal-assisted therapy in the intensive care unit: A staff nurse’s dream comes true. Nursing Clinics of North America, 30, 529–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coss, R. G., & Moore, M. (1990). All that glistens: Water connotations in surface finishes. Ecological Psychology, 2, 367–380. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0204_3
   Google Scholar
• Coss, R. G., Ruff, S., & Simms, T. (2003). All that glistens: II. The effects of reflective surface finishes on the mouthing activity of infants and toddlers. Ecological Psychology, 15, 197–213. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1503_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. T. C., & Gaston, K. J. (2015). Likeability of garden birds: Importance of species knowledge and richness in connecting people to nature. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0141505. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cracknell, D., White, M. P., Pahl, S., & Depledge, M. H. (2017). A preliminary investigation into the restorative potential of public aquaria exhibits: A UK student-based study. Landscape Research, 42, 18–32. doi:10.1080/01426397.2016.1243236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cracknell, D. L., White, M., Pahl, S., Nichols, W. J., & Depledge, M. H. (2015). Marine biota and psychological well-being: A preliminary examination of dose–response effects in an aquarium setting. Environment and Behavior, 48, 1242–1269. doi:10.1177/0013916515597512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, S. (2009). Wildlife tourism: The intangible, psychological benefits of human–wildlife encounters. Current Issues in Tourism, 12, 451–474. doi:10.1080/13683500903042857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 62, 47–55. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSchriver, M. M., & Riddick, C. C. (1990). Effects of watching aquariums on elders’ stress. Anthrozoös, 4, 44–48. doi:10.2752/089279391787057396
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, N. E., & Beck, A. M. (2002). Animal-assisted therapy and nutrition in Alzheimer’s disease. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24, 697–712. doi:10.1177/019394502320555430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin, R. M. (1982). Observer variability in estimating numbers: An experiment. Journal of Field Ornithology, 53, 159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Heimlich, J., & Bronnenkant, K. (2008). Using identity-related visit motivations as a tool for understanding adult zoo and aquarium visitor’s meaning making. Curator, The Museum Journal, 51, 55–79. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00294.x
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, P. C., Hylton, B., Heath, J. A., & Ruane, M. (2003). Accuracy and variation in estimates of large numbers of birds by individual observers using an aerial survey simulator. Journal of Field Ornithology, 74, 281–287. doi:10.1648/0273-8570-74.3.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of green space increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–394. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martinez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2015). Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 4354–4379. doi:10.3390/ijerph120404354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatersleben, B., & Andrews, M. (2013). When walking in nature is not restorative - The role of prospect and refuge. Health and Place, 20, 91–101. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusset, M., & Dick, G. (2011). The global reach of zoos and aquaria in visitor number and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biology, 30, 566–569. doi:10.1002/zoo.20369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 21.1–21.22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerwagen, J. (2009). Biophilia, health, and well-being. In L. Campbell, & A. Wiesen (Eds), Restorative commons: Creating health and well-being through urban landscapes (pp. 38–57). Northern Research Station: Gen. Tech Rep. NRS-P-39. USA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R. (1985). A cognitive analysis of preferences for waterscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 225–241. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(85)80024-4
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, A. K. (2014). Biophilic design, restorative environments and well-being. In J. Salamance, P. Desmet, A. Burbano, & J. Maya (Eds), Proceedings of the colors of care: The 9th International Conference on design & emotions (pp. 535–544). Ediciones Uniandes, Colombia: Bogota.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S.-C. L. (2009). The validity of visual surrogates for representing waterscapes. Landscape Research, 34, 323–335. doi:10.1080/01426390902867984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Pretty, J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). Nature as a source of health and well-being: Is this an ecosystem service that could pay for conserving biodiversity? In D. W. Macdonald, & K. J. Willis (Eds), Key topics in conservation biology 2 (pp. 143–160). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. H., Fehres, P., & Campbell, M. (2012). Measuring emotions toward wildlife: A review of generic methods and instruments. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17, 233–247. doi:10.1080/10871209.2012.680175
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, R. L., Bailey, I., Laffoley, D. D., Richards, J. P., & Attrill, M. J. (2014). Public perceptions of the UK marine environment. Marine Policy, 43, 327–337. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, U.S.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katcher, A., Segal, H., & Beck, A. (1984). Comparison of contemplation and hypnosis for the reduction of anxiety and discomfort during dental surgery. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 14–21. doi:10.1080/00029157.1984.10402583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katcher, A. H., Friedman, E., Beck, A. M., & Lynch, J. J. (1983). Looking, talking and blood pressure: The physiological consequences of interaction with the living environments. In A. H. Katcher, & A. M. Beck (Eds), New Perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 351–359). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42–69). Washington DC, London: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, A. H., & Kidd, R. M. (1999). Benefits, problems, and characteristics of home aquarium owners. Psychological Reports, 84, 998–1004. doi:10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3.998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfield, J., & James, C. (2009). Fishy tales: Experiences of the occupation of keeping fish as pets. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 349–356. doi:10.1177/030802260907200805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X., & Matthies, D. (2010). The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biological Conservation, 143, 195–202. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Higgins, S. L., Irvine, K. N., & Depledge, M. H. (2014). A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews, 17, 1–20. doi:10.1080/10937404.2013.856361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. R. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 430–434. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasar, J., & Lin, Y.-H. (2003). Evaluative responses to five kinds of water features. Landscape Research, 28, 441–450. doi:10.1080/0142639032000150167
   Google Scholar
• Nelms, S. E., Coombes, C., Foster, L. C., Galloway, T. S., Godley, B. J., Lindeque, P. K., & Witt, M. J. (2017). Marine anthropogenic litter on British beaches@ A 10-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 1399–1409. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G., & Nunes, P. A. L. D. (2008). Economic valuation of biodiversity: A comparative study. Ecological Economics, 67, 217–231. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2002). Motivational factors and the visitor experience: A comparison of three sites. Curator: The Museum Journal, 45, 183–198. doi:10.1111/cura.2002.45.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., & Bond, N. (2010). Museums as restorative environments. Curator: The Museum Journal, 53, 421–436. doi:10.1111/cura.2010.53.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, D. G., & Craig, T. (2014). The great outdoors? Exploring the mental health benefits of natural environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1178. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton, L., Martin, N., & Webster, D. G. (2001). Public perceptions of environmental quality: A survey study of beach use and perceptions in Los Angeles County. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 1155–1160. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00131-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, O., & Shashar, N. (2013). Economic value of biological attributes of artificial coral reefs. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 70, 904–912. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fst014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, T., Peron, E., & Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and Behavior, 33, 93–106. doi:10.1177/00139160121972882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddick, C. C. (1985). Health, aquaria, and the non-institutionalised elderly. Special issue: Pets and the family. Marriage & Family Review, 8, 163–173. doi:10.1300/J002v08n03_12
   Google Scholar
• Sandifer, P. A., Sutton-Grier, A. E., & Ward, B. P. (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skibins, J. C., Dunstan, E., & Pahlow, K. (2017). Exploring the influence of charismatic characteristics on flagship outcomes in zoo visitors. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. doi:10.1080/10871209.2016.1276233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, H., & Hartig, T. (2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 199–211. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. L. (2007). Things we like: Human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation. Human Ecology, 35, 361–369. doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9056-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman, & J. F. Wohwill (Eds), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). New York, USA: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. In S. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Washington DC, USA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, M. C., Watkinson, A. R., & Côté, C. (2009). Managing dive tourism for the sustainable use of coral reefs: Validating diver perceptions of attractive site features. Environmental Management, 43, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9198-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, A. E., Jorgensen, A., & Wilson, E. R. (2014). Evaluating restoration in urban greenspaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape & Urban Planning, 127, 173–181. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, A. E., Joye, Y., & Koole, S. L. (2016). Why viewing nature is more fascinating and restorative than viewing buildings: A closer look at perceived complexity. Urban Foresty & Urban Greening, 20, 397–401. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 135–146. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Volker, S., & Kistemann, T. (2011). The impact of blue space on human health and well-being – Salutogenic health effects of inland surface waters: A review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 214, 449–460. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, D. L. (2005). The effect of videotapes of animals on cardiovascular responses to stress. Stress and Health, 21, 209–213. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 482–493. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., Weeks, A., Hooper, T., Bleakley, L., Cracknell, D., Lovelll, R., & Jefferson. (2017). Marine wildlife as an important component of coastal visits: The role of perceived biodiversity and species behavior. Marine Policy, 78, 80–89. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., Cracknell, D., Corcoran, A., Bleakley, L., Jenkinson, G., & Depledge, M. H.. (2014). Do preferences 650 for waterscapes persist in inclement weather and extend to sub-aquatic scenes?. Landscape Research, 39, 339–358. doi:10.1080/01426397.2012.759919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. P., Pahl, S., Ashbullby, K., Herbert, S., & Depledge, M. H. (2013). Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (1997). Occupational deprivation and incarceration. Journal of Occupational Science, 4, 126–130. doi:10.1080/14427591.1997.9686429
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1993). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In S. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 31–41). Washington DC, USA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, B. (2000). Beauty and the beast: Preferences for animals in Australia. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 11, 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita, S. (2002). Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: Use of photo-projective method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 3–17. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00093-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar