842
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Understanding stakeholders’ opinions and preferences for non-native pet trade management in Florida

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Alaimo, K., Olson, C. M., & Frongillo, E. A. (1999). Importance of cognitive testing for survey items: An example from Food Security Questionnaires. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 31, 269–275. doi:10.1016/S0022-3182(99)70463-2
  • Beck, K. G., Zimmerman, K., Schardt, J. D., Stone, J., Lukens, R. R., Reichard, S., … Thompson, J. P. (2008). Invasive species defined in a policy context: Recommendations from the Federal Invasive Species Advisory Committee. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 1, 414–421. doi:10.1614/IPSM-08-089.1
  • Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bilger, B. (2009, April 20). Swamp things. New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/04/20/swamp-things
  • Bremner, A., & Park, K. (2007). Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biological Conservation, 139, 306–314. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.005
  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Engeman, R., Jacobson, E., Avery, M. L., & Meshaka, W. E., Jr. (2011). The aggressive invasion of exotic reptiles in Florida with a focus on prominent species: A review. Current Zoology, 57, 599–612. doi:10.1093/czoolo/57.5.599
  • Estévez, R. A., Anderson, C. B., Pizarro, J. C., & Burgman, M. A. (2015). Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conservation Biology, 29, 19–30. doi:10.1111/cobi.12359
  • Frame, T. M., Gunton, T., & Day, J. C. (2004). The role of collaboration in environmental management: An evaluation of land and resource planning in British Columbia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 59–82. doi:10.1080/0964056042000189808
  • Genovesi, P. (2008). Limits and potentialities of eradication as a tool for addressing biological invasions. In W. Nentwig (Ed.), Biological invasions: Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis) (Vol. 193, pp. 385–400). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  • Hardin, S. (2007). Managing non-native wildlife in Florida: State perspective, policy and practice. In G. W. Witmer, W. C. Pitt, & K. A. Fagerston (Eds.), Managing vertebrate invasive species: Proceedings of an international symposium (pp. 43–52). Fort Collins, CO: USDA/APHIS Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center.
  • Herrel, A., & van der Meijden, A. (2014). An analysis of the live reptile and amphibian trade in the USA compared to the global trade in endangered species. The Herpetological Journal, 24, 103–110.
  • Keller, R. P., Lodge, D. M., & Finnoff, D. C. (2007). Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 203–207. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605787104
  • Kraus, F. (2009). Alien reptiles and amphibians: A scientific compendium and analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Krysko, K. L., Enge, K. M., Donlan, E. M., Seitz, J. C., & Golden, E. A. (2007). Distribution, natural history, and impacts of the introduced green iguana (Iguana iguana) in Florida. Iguana, 14(3), 2–17.
  • Krysko, K. L., Somma, L. A., Smith, D. C., Gillette, C. R., Cueva, D., Wasilewski, J. A., … Rochford, M. R. (2016). New verified nonindigenous amphibians and reptiles in Florida through 2015, with a summary of over 152 years of introductions. Reptiles and Amphibians: Conservation and Natural History, 23, 110–143.
  • Larson, D. L., Phillips-Mao, L., Quiram, G., Sharpe, L., Stark, R., Sugita, S., & Weiler, A. (2011). A framework for sustainable invasive species management: Environmental, social, and economic objectives. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 14–22. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.025
  • Mackenzie, B. F., & Larson, B. M. (2010). Participation under time constraints: Landowner perceptions of rapid response to the emerald ash borer. Society and Natural Resources, 23, 1013–1022. doi:10.1080/08941920903339707
  • Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158. doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137
  • Perry, G., & Farmer, M. (2011). Reducing the risk of biological invasion by creating incentives for pet sellers and owners to do the right thing. Journal of Herpetology, 45, 134–141. doi:10.1670/09-254.1
  • Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., & Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics, 52, 273–288. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002
  • Prestridge, H. L., Fitzgerald, L. A., & Hibbitts, T. J. (2011). Trade in non-native amphibians and reptiles in Texas: Lessons for better monitoring and implications for species introduction. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 6, 324–339.
  • Prinbeck, G., Lach, D., & Chan, S. (2011). Exploring stakeholders’ attitudes and beliefs regarding behaviors that prevent the spread of invasive species. Environmental Education Research, 17, 341–352. doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.542451
  • Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
  • Rivalan, P., Delmas, V., Angulo, E., Bull, L. S., Hall, R. J., Courchamp, F., … Leader-Williams, N. (2007). Can bans stimulate wildlife trade? Nature, 447, 529–530. doi:10.1038/447529a
  • Romagosa, C. (2014). Patterns of live vertebrate importation into the United States: Analysis of an invasion pathway. In R. P. Keller, M. W. Cadotte, & G. Sandiford (Eds.), Invasive species in a globalized world: Ecological, social, and legal perspectives on policy (pp. 115–146). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Romagosa, C. M., Guyer, C., & Wooten, M. C. (2009). Contribution of the live‐vertebrate trade toward taxonomic homogenization. Conservation Biology, 23, 1001–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01194.x
  • Selge, S., Fischer, A., & van der Wal, R. (2011). Public and professional views on invasive non-native species: A qualitative social scientific investigation. Biological Conservation, 144, 3089–3097. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.014
  • Seymour, M. (2013). “Support your local invasive species”: Animal protection rhetoric and nonnative species. Society & Animals, 21, 54–73. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341269
  • Sharp, R. L., Larson, L. R., & Green, G. T. (2011). Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management. Biological Conservation, 144, 2097–2104. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.032
  • Simberloff, D., Martin, J. L., Genovesi, P., Maris, V., Wardle, D. A., Aronson, J., … Pyšek, P. (2013). Impacts of biological invasions: What’s what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 58–66. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013
  • Springborn, M., Romagosa, C. M., & Keller, R. P. (2011). The value of nonindigenous species risk assessment in international trade. Ecological Economics, 70, 2145–2153. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.016
  • Springborn, M. R., Keller, R. P., Elwood, S., Romagosa, C. M., Zambrana‐Torrelio, C., & Daszak, P. (2015). Integrating invasion and disease in the risk assessment of live bird trade. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 101–110. doi:10.1111/ddi.12281
  • St John, F A., Edwards-Jones, G., & Jones, J.P. (2011). Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research, 37, 658-667.
  • Stern, M. J. (2008). Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: The role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environmental Conservation, 35, 200–210. doi:10.1017/S037689290800502X
  • Stokes, K. E., Montgomery, W. I., Dick, J. T. A., Maggs, C. A., & McDonald, R. A. (2006). The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: A cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodiversity & Conservation, 15, 2829–2852. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Teillac-Deschamps, P., Lorrillière, R., Servais, V., Delmas, V., Cadi, A., & Prévot-Julliard, A. C. (2009). Management strategies in urban green spaces: Models based on an introduced exotic pet turtle. Biological Conservation, 142, 2258–2269. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.004
  • Townsend, J. H., Krysko, K. L., & Enge, K. M. (2003). Introduced iguanas in southern Florida: A history of more than 35 years. Iguana, 10(4), 111–118.
  • Witmer, G., Keirn, G. M., Hawley, N., Martin, C., & Reaser, J. K. (2009). Human dimensions of invasive vertebrate species management. In J. R. Boulanger (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th Wildlife Damage Management Conferences. Saratoga Springs, NY.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.