Temporal patterns of human-fox interactions as revealed from internet searches

References

• Alexander, S. M., & Quinn, M. S. (2011). Coyote (Canis latrans) interactions with humans and pets reported in the Canadian print media (1995–2010). Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 345–359. doi:10.1080/10871209.2011.599050
   Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y, & Hayat, Z. (2011). The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users: a representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 585-589. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P. J., Funk, S., Harris, S., Newman, T., Saunders, G., & White, P. (2004). The impact of human attitudes on the social and spatial organisation of urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes) before and after an outbreak of sarcoptic mange. In W. W. Shaw, L. K. Harris, & L. VanDruff (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Urban Wildlife Conservation (pp. 153–163). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. J., Boitani, L., Harris, S., Saunders, G., & White, P. C. L. (2008). Terrestrial carnivores and human food production: Impact and management. Mammal Review, 38, 123–166. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2008.00122.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P. J., & Harris, S. (2007). Urban mammals: What does the future hold? An analysis of the factors affecting patterns of use of residential gardens in Great Britain. Mammal Review, 37, 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. O, & Timm, R. M. (2017). Coyote attacks on humans, 1970-2015: implications for reducing the risks. Human–Wildlife Interactions, 11(2), 120-132. doi:10.5070/V427110675
   Google Scholar
• Bastien, M., Vaniscotte, A., Combes, B., Umhang, G., Raton, V., Germain, E., … Poulle, M. L. (2019). Identifying drivers of fox and cat faecal deposits in kitchen gardens in order to evaluate measures for reducing contamination of fresh fruit and vegetables. Food and Waterborne Parasitology, 14, e00034. doi:10.1016/j.fawpar.2018.e00034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carricondo-Sanchez, D., Odden, M., Linnell, J. D., & Odden, J. (2017). The range of the mange: Spatiotemporal patterns of sarcoptic mange in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) as revealed by camera trapping. PloS One, 12(4), e0176200. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallini, P. (1994). Faeces count as an index of fox abundance. Acta Theriologica, 39, 417–424. doi:10.4098/0001-7051
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M. R. (1997). Wildlife management by metropolitan residents in the United States: Practices, perceptions, costs, and values. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 306–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, M. R., Pitt, W. C., Kessler, K. K., DuBow, T. J., & Sanborn, W. A. (1995). Review of human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23, 407–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, R. A., Di Minin, E., Jarić, I., Jepson, P., Ladle, R., Mittermeier, J., … Veríssimo, D. (2019). Inferring public interest from search engine data requires caution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17, 254–255. doi:10.1002/fee.2019.17.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, J., Roper, T. J., Wilson, C. J., Heydon, M. J., & Delahay, R. J. (2011). Assessing spatiotemporal associations in the occurrence of badger – Human conflict in England. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57, 67–76. doi:10.1007/s10344-010-0400-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devenish-Nelson, E. S., Richards, S. A., Harris, S., Soulsbury, C. D., & Stephens, P. A. (2014). Demonstrating frequency-dependent transmission of sarcoptic mange in red foxes. Biology Letters, 10(10), 20140524. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13, 458–466. doi:10.1111/acv.2010.13.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorning, J., & Harris, S. (2017). Dominance, gender, and season influence food patch use in a group-living, solitary foraging canid. Behavioral Ecology, 28, 1302–1313. doi:10.1093/beheco/arx092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, S., & Jacobson, S. K. (2012). Human-wildlife conflict and environmental education: Evaluating a community program to protect the Andean bear in Ecuador. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43, 55–65. doi:10.1080/00958964.2011.579642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, J. K., Fawcett, J. M., & Soulsbury, C. D. (2013). Seasonal and sex differences in urine marking rates of wild red foxes. Vulpes Vulpes. Journal of Ethology, 31, 41–47. doi:10.1007/s10164-012-0348-7
   Google Scholar
• Fidino, M., Herr, S. W., & Magle, S. B. (2018). Assessing online opinions of wildlife through social media. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23, 482–490. doi:10.1080/10871209.2018.1468943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: an introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29(6), 738-743. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1103388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, B, Glikman, J. A, Sutherland, M, & Bath, A. J. (2016). Predictors of extreme negative feelings toward coyote in Newfoundland. Human Dimensions Of Wildlife, 21(4), 297-310. doi:10.1080/10871209.2016.1151965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaston, K. J., Fuller, R. A., Loram, A., MacDonald, C., Power, S., & Dempsey, N. (2007). Urban domestic gardens (XI): Variation in urban wildlife gardening in the United Kingdom. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 3227–3238. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9174-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geelhoed, E. (2002). Wild Wild WEB: Wildlife enthusiasts’ use of the Internet. HP Laboratories Bristol, Information Infrastructure Laboratory, 1, Retrieved from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-248.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, S. E., & Krausman, P. R. (2009). Use of urban landscape by coyotes. The Southwestern Naturalist, 54, 1–13. doi:10.1894/MLK-05.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger, Y. A., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441–449. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00017-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. L., Clemes, S. A., & Griffiths, P. L. (2008). UK adults exhibit higher step counts in summer compared to winter months. Annals of Human Biology, 35, 154–169. doi:10.1080/03014460801908058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. (1981). The food of suburban foxes (Vulpes vulpes), with special reference to London. Mammal Review, 11, 151–168. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1981.tb00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. (1985). Humane control of foxes. In D. Britt (Ed.), Humane control of land mammals and birds (pp. 63–74). London, UK: Eastern Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S., & Rayner, J. M. V. (1986). Urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) population estimates and habitat requirements in several British cities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 55, 575–591. doi:10.2307/4740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. J., Massimino, D., Eaton, M. A., Gillings, S., Noble, D. G., Balmer, D. E., … Woodcock, P. (2019). The breeding bird survey 2018. Thetford, UK: BTO Research Report 717. British Trust for Ornithology.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, A., Toivonen, T., Slotow, R., Tenkanen, H., Moilanen, A., Heikinheimo, V., & Di Minin, E. (2018). Social media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature‐based experiences in protected areas. Conservation Letters, 11(1), e12343. doi:10.1111/conl.12343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iossa, G. (2005). The reproductive behaviour of an urban red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Iossa, G., Soulsbury, C. D., Baker, P. J., & Harris, S. (2008). Body mass, territory size, and life-history tactics in a socially monogamous canid, the red fox Vulpes vulpes. Journal of Mammalogy, 89, 1481–1490. doi:10.1644/07-MAMM-A-405.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, A. (2008). Fears, attitudes and opinions of suburban residents with regards to their urban foxes. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54, 101–109. doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0117-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladle, R. J., Correia, R. A., Do, Y., Joo, G. J., Malhado, A. C., Proulx, R., … Jepson, P. (2016). Conservation culturomics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 269–275. doi:10.1002/fee.1260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, K. J., & Adams, C. E. (2006). Public demand for information and assistance at the human–wildlife interface. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11, 267–283. doi:10.1080/10871200600803135
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, H. G., & Englund, J. (1973). The reproductive cycle of the red fox in Europe. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement, 19, 119–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lukasik, V. M., & Alexander, S. M. (2011). Human–coyote interactions in Calgary, Alberta. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 114–127. doi:10.1080/10871209.2011.544014
   Google Scholar
• Marley, J., Hyde, A., Salkeld, J. H., Prima, M. C., Parrott, L., Senger, S. E., & Tyson, R. C. (2017). Does human education reduce conflicts between humans and bears? An agent-based modelling approach. Ecological Modelling, 343, 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIver, D. J., & Brownstein, J. S. (2014). Wikipedia usage estimates prevalence of influenza-like illness in the United States in near real-time. PLoS Computatinal Biology, 10(4), e1003581. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton-Fisher, N., Harris, S., White, P., & Jones, G. (1993). Structure and function of red fox Vulpes vulpes vocalisations. Bioacoustics, 5, 1–31. doi:10.1080/09524622.1993.9753228
   Google Scholar
• Plumer, L., Davison, J., & Saarma, U. (2014). Rapid urbanization of red foxes in Estonia: Distribution, behaviour, attacks on domestic animals, and health-risks related to zoonotic diseases. PLoS One, 9(12), e115124. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poessel, S. A., Breck, S. W., Teel, T. L., Shwiff, S., Crooks, K. R., & Angeloni, L. (2013). Patterns of human–coyote conflicts in the Denver Metropolitan Area. Journal of Wildlife Management, 77, 297–305. doi:10.1002/jwmg.454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proulx, R., Massicotte, P., & Pépino, M. (2014). Googling trends in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 28, 44–51. doi:10.1111/cobi.12131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, C. P., Baker, P. J., & Harris, S. (2000). Ranging behaviour of juvenile red foxes and its implications for management. Acta Theriologica, 45, 525–536. doi:10.4098/AT.arch.00-51
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, J., Soykan, C. U., Distler, T., & Langham, G. (2015). Searching for backyard birds in virtual worlds: Internet queries mirror real species distributions. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24(5), 1147-1154. doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0847-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. M., Berg, M. J., Tolhurst, B. A., Chauvenet, A. L. M., Smith, G. C., Neaves, K., … Baker, P. J. (2014). Changes in the distribution of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in urban areas in Great Britain: Findings and limitations of a media-driven nationwide survey. PLoS One, 9(6), e99059. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano-Redondo, A., Bearhop, S., Lock, L., Votier, S. C., & Hilton, G. M. (2017). Internet-based monitoring of public perception of conservation. Biological Conservation, 206, 304–309. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulsbury, C. D., Baker, P. J., Iossa, G., & Harris, S. (2010). Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). In S. D. Gehrt, S. P. D. Riley, & B. L. Cypher (Eds.), Urban carnivores (pp. 63–75). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soulsbury, C. D., & White, P. C. L. (2019). A framework for assessing and quantifying human–wildlife interactions in urban areas. In B. Frank, J. Glickman, & S. Marchini (Eds.), Human–Wildlife interactions: Turning conflict into coexistence (pp. 107–128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soulsbury, C. D., & Fawcett, J. K. (2015). Ontogenic patterns of scent marking in red foxes, Vulpes vulpes (Carnivora: Canidae). Folia Zoologica, 64, 40–44. doi:10.25225/fozo.v64.i1.a5.2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulsbury, C. D., Iossa, G., Baker, P. J., Cole, N. C., Funk, S. M., & Harris, S. (2007). The impact of sarcoptic mange Sarcoptes scabiei on the British fox Vulpes vulpes population. Mammal Review, 37, 278–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulsbury, C. D., Iossa, G., Baker, P. J., & Harris, S. (2008). Environmental variation at the onset of independent foraging affects full-grown body mass in the red fox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275(1649), 2411–2418. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulsbury, C. D., Iossa, G., Baker, P. J., White, P. C., & Harris, S. (2011). Behavioral and spatial analysis of extraterritorial movements in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Journal of Mammalogy, 92, 190–199. doi:10.1644/09-MAMM-A-187.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulsbury, C. D., & White, P. C. L. (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: A review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research, 42, 541–553. doi:10.1071/WR14229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weckel, M. E., Mack, D., Nagy, C., Christie, R., & Wincorn, A. (2010). Using citizen science to map human–coyote interaction in suburban New York, USA. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 1163–1171. doi:10.2193/2008-512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. C. L., & Ward, A. I. (2011). Interdisciplinary approaches for the management of existing and emerging human–wildlife conflicts. Wildlife Research, 37, 623–629. doi:10.1071/WR10191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde, G. R., & Pope, K. L. (2013). Worldwide trends in fishing interest indicated by internet search volume. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 20, 211–222. doi:10.1111/fme.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wine, S., Gagné, S. A., & Meentemeyer, R. K. (2015). Understanding human–coyote encounters in urban ecosystems using citizen science data: What do socioeconomics tell us? Environmental Management, 55, 159–170. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0373-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar