245
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using psychometrics to characterize the cognitive antecedents of tolerance for black bears

, &

References

  • Agee, J. D., & Miller, C. A. (2009). Factors contributing toward acceptance of lethal control of black bears in central Georgia, USA. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200902877829
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031930
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
  • Beatty, K. M., & Walter, O. (1984). Religious preference and practice: Reevaluating their impact on political tolerance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(1), 318. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/48.1B.318
  • Brenner, L., & Metcalf, E. (2019). Beyond the tolerance/intolerance dichotomy: Incorporating attitudes and acceptability into a robust definition of social tolerance for wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 25(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2019.1702741
  • Bruskotter, J., & Fulton, D. (2012). Will hunters steward wolves? A comment on Treves and Martin. Society & Natural Resources, 25(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.622735
  • Bruskotter, J., & Wilson, R. (2014). Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conservation Letters, 7(3), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12072
  • Bruskotter, J., Singh, A., Fulton, D. C., & Slagle, K. (2015). Assessing tolerance for wildlife: Clarifying relations between concepts and measures. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2015.1016387
  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Sage.
  • Decker, D., & Purdy, K. (1988). Toward a concept of wildlife acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16 (1) , 53–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3782353
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2005). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
  • Doorn, M. V. (2014). The nature of tolerance and the social circumstances in which it emerges. Current Sociology, 62(6), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114537281
  • Frank, B. (2016). Human-wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29(6), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1103388
  • Frank, B., & Glikman, J. (2019). Human-wildlife conflicts and the need to include coexistence. In B. Frank, J. Glikman, & S. Marchini (Eds.), Human–wildlife interactions: Turning conflict into coexistence (pp. 1–19). Cambridge University Press.
  • Fulton, D., Manfredo, M., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(2), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209609359060
  • Glikman, J., Frank, B., Ruppert, K., Knox, J., Sponarski, C., Metcalf, E., Metcalf, A., & Marchini, S. (2021). Coexisting with different human-wildlife coexistence perspectives. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.703174
  • Hansson, A. (2007). The concept of tolerance. Theoria, 73(4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2007.tb01209.x
  • Heneghan, M. D., & Morse, W. (2018). Finding our bearings: Understanding public attitudes toward growing black bear populations in Alabama. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1386248
  • Herrero, S., & Higgins, A. (1999). Human injuries inflicted by bears in British Columbia: 1960–97. Ursus, 11, 209–218. ISSN: 11:209-218. https://www.bearbiology.org/publications/ursus-archive/human-injuries-inflicted-by-bears-in-british-columbia-1960-97/
  • Hjerm, M., Eger, M., Bohman, A., & Connolly, F. (2019). A new approach to the study of tolerance: Conceptualizing and measuring acceptance, respect, and appreciation of difference. Social Indicators Research, 147(3), 897–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02176-y
  • Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value, attitude, behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638
  • Hosaka, T., Sugimoto, K., & Numata, S. (2017). Effects of childhood experience with nature on tolerance of urban residents toward hornets and wild boars in Japan. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0175243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175243
  • Hristienko, H., & McDonald, J. E. (2007). Going into the 21st century: A perspective on trends and controversies in the management of the American black bear. Ursus, 18(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.2192/1537-6176(2007)18[72:GITSCA]2.0.CO;2
  • Inskip, C., Carter, N., Riley, S., Roberts, T., & MacMillan, D. (2016). Toward human-carnivore coexistence: Understanding tolerance for tigers in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0145913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145913
  • Jackson, J. M. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In I. D. Steiner & M. F. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301–309). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Kansky, R., Kidd, M., & Knight, A. T. (2016). A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts. Biological Conservation, 201, 137–145. ISSN: 0006-3207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.002
  • Knox, J., Ruppert, K., Frank, B., Sponarski, C., & Glikmann, J. (2020). Usage, definition, and measurement of coexistence, tolerance, and acceptance in wildlife conservation research in Africa. Ambio, 50(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01352-6
  • Lackey, C., Breck, S., Wakeling, B., & White, B. (2018). Human-black bear conflict: A review of the most common management practices. Human-Wildlife Interactions Monograph, 2(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.26079/05f7-938e
  • Lischka, S., Teel, T., Johnson, H., & Crooks, K. (2019). Understanding and managing human tolerance for a large carnivore in a residential system. Biological Conservation, 238, 108189. ISSN: 0006-3207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.034
  • Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
  • Loker, C., Decker, D., & Schwager, S. (1999). Social acceptability of wildlife management actions in suburban areas: 3 cases from New York. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27(1), 152–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3783952
  • Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Sage.
  • Mather, D., & Tranby, E. (2014). New dimensions of tolerance: A case for a broader, categorical approach. Sociological Science, 1(28), 512–531. https://doi.org/10.15195/v1.a28
  • Morzillo, A. T., & Needham, M. D. (2015). Landowner incentives and normative tolerances for managing beaver impacts. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(6), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2015.1083062
  • Naughton-Treves, L. (1998). Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 12(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96346.x
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Connor, B. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807
  • Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). (2012). Oregon black bear management plan.
  • Schroeder, S., Fulton, D., Cornicelli, L., & Bruskotter, J. (2018). How Minnesota wolf hunter and trapper attitudes and risk- and benefit-based beliefs predict wolf management preferences. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23(6), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1511876
  • Siemer, W., Decker, D., James, S., & Wieczorek Hudenko, H. (2014). How do suburban coyote attacks affect residents’ perceptions? Insights from a New York case study. Cities and the Environment, 7(2), 7. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol7/iss2/7
  • Skogen, K., & Krange, O. (2020). The political dimensions of illegal wolf hunting: Anti-elitism, lack of trust in institutions and acceptance of illegal wolf killing among Norwegian hunters. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(3), 552–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12309
  • Slagle, K., & Bruskotter, J. (2019). Tolerance for wildlife. In B. Frank, J. Glikman, & S. Marchini (Eds.), Human–wildlife interactions: Turning conflict into coexistence (pp. 1–19). Cambridge University Press.
  • Stern, M. J. (2018). Social science theory for environmental sustainability: A practical guide. Oxford University Press.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
  • Taylor, J. D., Kline, K. N., & Morzillo, A. T. (2019). Estimating economic impact of black bear damage to western conifers at a landscape scale. Forest Ecology and Management, 432, 599–606. ISSN: 0378-1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.005
  • Teixeira, L., Tisovec-Dufner, K., Marin, G., Marchini, S., Dorresteijn, I., & Pardini, R. (2020). Linking human and ecological components to understand human-wildlife conflicts across landscapes and species. Conservation Biology, 35(1), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13537
  • Treves, A. (2012). Tolerant attitudes reflect an intent to steward: A reply to Bruskotter and Fulton. Society & Natural Resources, 25(1), 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.621512
  • Treves, A., Naughton-Treves, L., & Shelley, V. (2013). Longitudinal analysis of attitudes toward wolves. Conservation Biology, 27(2), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12009
  • Van, B. S. (2018). Flexible imputation of missing data (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
  • Vaske, J., & Whittaker, D. (2004). Normative approaches to natural resources. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Society and natural resources. A summary of knowledge for the 10th International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources (Modern Litho) (pp. 283–294).
  • Vaske, J., & Needham, M. (2007). Segmenting public beliefs about conflict with coyotes in an urban recreation setting. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 25(4), 79–98. https://js.sagamorepub.com/jpra/article/view/1352
  • Vaske, J. J. (2019). Survey research and analysis. Sagamore-Venture.
  • Vogt, W. P. (1997). Tolerance & education: Learning to live with diversity and difference. Sage.
  • Weldon, S. (2006). The institutional context of tolerance for ethic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00187.x
  • Wood, N., Gnonhosou, D., & Bowling, J. (2015). Combining parallel and exploratory factor analysis in identifying relationship scales in secondary data. Marriage & Family Review, 51(5), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1059785
  • Zimmermann, A., Walpole, M., & Leader-Williams, N. (2005). Cattle rancher’s attitudes to conflicts with jaguar Panthera onca in the Pantanal of Brazil. Oryx, 39(4), 406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605305000992
  • Zinn, H., Manfredo, M., Vaske, J., & Wittmann, K. (1998). Using normative beliefs to determine acceptability of wildlife management actions. Society and Natural Resources, 11(7), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929809381109
  • Zinn, H., Manfredo, M., & Decker, D. (2008). Human conditioning to wildlife: Steps toward theory and research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13(6), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200802427972

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.