Integrated problem-based learning versus lectures: a path analysis modelling of the relationships between educational context and learning approaches

References

• Marton F, Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process British. J Educ Psychol. 1976;46(1):4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Prosser M. Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory [journal article]. Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16(4):409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs JB. The role of metalearning in study process. Br J Educ Psychol. 1985;55(3):185–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs JB, Kember D, Leung DYP. The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br Educ Psychol. 2001;71:133–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs JB. From Theory to Practice: A Cognitive Systems Approach. Higher Educ Res Dev. 1993 Jan;12(1):73–85. .
   Google Scholar
• Feeley AM, Biggerstaff DL. exam success at undergraduate and graduate-entry medical schools: is learning style or learning approach more important? a critical review exploring links between academic success, learning styles, and learning approaches among school-leaver entry (“traditional”) and graduate-entry (“nontraditional”) medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;27(3):237–244. . PubMed PMID: 26158325; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May W, Chung E-K, Elliott D, et al. The relationship between medical students’ learning approaches and performance on a summative high-stakes clinical performance examination. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e236–e241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamonson Y, Weaver R, Chang S, et al. Learning approaches as predictors of academic performance in first year health and science students. Nurse Education Today. 2013 July;33(7):729–733. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, et al. On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: the effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learn Instruction. 2006;16(4):279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle NJ, Peterson ER. Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. Int J Educ Res. 2004;41(6):407–428.
   Google Scholar
• Marton F, Säljö R. Approaches to learning. In: DJHaNJEE, Marton F, editor. The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels D, Segers M, Struyf E. Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instr Sci. 2008;36(5):431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten M, Kyndt E, Struyven K, et al. Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educ Res Rev. 2010;5(3):243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle NJ. Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: introduction to the special issue. High Educ. 1991;22(3):201–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genn JM. AMEE medical education guide no. 23 (part 1): curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001a Jul;23(4):337–344. . PubMed PMID: 12098379; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller FH, Louw J. Learning environment, motivation and interest: perspectives on self-determination theory. South Afr J Psychol. 2004 Jun 1;34(2):169–190. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne SJ, Fortner SA, Kitzes JA, et al. Cause or effect? The relationship between student perception of the medical school learning environment and academic performance on USMLE Step 1. Med Teach. 2013;35(5):376–380. . PubMed PMID: 23444883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser BJ. Science learning environments: assessment, effects and determinants. In: BJFKGT, editor. International handbook of science education. Great Britain: Kluwer. 1998. p. 527–561.
   Google Scholar
• Genn JM. AMEE medical education guide no. 23 (part 2): curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education - a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001b;23(5):445–454. . PubMed PMID: 12098364; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide no. 96. Med Teach. 2015;37(4):312–322. . PubMed PMID: 25319403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson L, Stevens CM, Krasne S. No content without context: integrating basic, clinical, and social sciences in a pre-clerkship curriculum. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):812–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ. 2000 Jul;34(7):551–557. PubMed PMID: 10886638; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy F, Segers M, Van Den Bossche P, et al. Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instruction. 2003;13(5):533–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Acad Med. 1992 Sep;67(9):557–565. PubMed PMID: 1520409; Eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EHJ. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):792–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? [journal article]. Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16(3):235–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart BC, Burnett PC, Purdie N, et al. Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. J Educ Res. 2000;93(4):262–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stes A, De Maeyer S, Van Petegem P. Examining the cross-cultural sensitivity of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire (r-spq-2f) and validation of a Dutch version. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54099. . PubMed PMID: 23342085; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3546932. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immekus JC, Imbrie PK, Test A. Cross-validation of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire factor structure among western university students. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010 June 1;70(3):495–510. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustin M-P, Vinciguerra C, Isaac S, et al. Approches d’apprentissage et réussite en première année commune des études de santé (PACES) en France. Pédagogie Médicale. 2016;17(1):23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teach. 1997;19(4):295–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: A systematic review. Med Teach. 2010;32:947–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roff S. The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)–a generic instrument for measuring students’ perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Med Teach. 2005 Jun;27(4):322–325. . PubMed PMID: 16024414; Eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojat M, LaNoue M. Exploration and confirmation of the latent variable structure of the Jefferson scale of empathy. Int J Med Educ. 2014;5:73–81. . PubMed PMID: 25341215; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4207175. eng
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maccallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2): 130–149. citeulike-article-id:1538286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus alternative. Structural Equation Model. 1999;6. DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S. Students’ likes and dislikes regarding student-activating and lecture-based educational settings: consequences for students’ perceptions of the learning environment, student learning and performance. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2008 Sep 1;23(3):295–317. . English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Dundee RS. Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)–a generic instrument for measuring students’ perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Med Teach. 2005;27. DOI:10.1080/01421590500151054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean M, Van Wyk JM, Peters-Futre EM, et al. The small group in problem-based learning: more than a cognitive ‘learning’ experience for first-year medical students in a diverse population. Med Teach. 2006;28(4):e94–e103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles CR. Differences between conventional and problem-based curricula in their students’ approaches to studying. Med Educ. 1985;19(4):308–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard RI. How do medical students learn: medical student learning styles and factors that affect these learning styles. Teach Learn Med. 1995 Jan 1;7(4):201–210. .
   Google Scholar
• Zeegers P. Approaches to learning in science: a longitudinal study. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001 Mar;71(Pt 1):115–132. PubMed PMID: 11307704; eng
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou E, Christodoulides P. The impact of Greek University students’ perceptions of their learning environment on approaches to studying and academic outcomes. Int J Educ Res. 2005;43(6):329–350.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher DJ, Englander R, Carraccio C. Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment. Acad Med. 2013;88(11):1635–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell K, Prosser M. improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. High Educ. 1991;22(3):251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DH, Loyens SM, Marcq H, et al. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Nov;13(21):1087–1112. . PubMed PMID: 26563722; Eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis JFH, Segers MSR, Gijselaers WH. Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies [journal article]. Learn Environments Res. 2005;8(1):67–93.
   Google Scholar
• Groves M. Problem-based learning and learning approach: is there a relationship? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2005;10(4):315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M, et al. Effects of a metacognitive intervention on students’ approaches to learning and self-efficacy in a first year medical course. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 May;13(2):213–232. PubMed PMID: 17120079; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroffio A, Vu N, Gerbase M. Evolutionary trends of problem-based learning practices throughout a two-year preclinical program: a comparison of students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013 Oct 1;18(4):673–685. . English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skochelak SE, Stansfield RB, Dunham L, et al. Medical student perceptions of the learning environment at the end of the first year: a 28-medical school collaborative. Acad Med. 2016 Mar 8;91(9):1257–1262. PubMed PMID: 26959222; Eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruppen LD, Stansfield RB. Individual and institutional components of the medical school educational environment. Acad Med. 2016;91(11):S53–S57. . PubMed PMID: 00001888-201611001-00019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson K, Fowler J. Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2005 Feb;30(1):87–101. .
   Google Scholar
• Vermetten YJ, Vermunt JD, Lodewijks HG. Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learn Instruction. 2002 June;12(3):263–284. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkal K, Tekkaya C, Cakiroglu J, et al. A conceptual model of relationships among constructivist learning environment perceptions, epistemological beliefs, and learning approaches. Learn Individ Differ. 2009 Jan;19(1):71–79. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papinczak T. Are deep strategic learners better suited to PBL? A preliminary study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(3):337–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashin WE, Downey RG. Disciplinary differences in what is taught and in students’ perceptions of what they learn and of how they are taught. New Dir Teaching Learn. 1995;1995(64):81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Van Der Molen HT, Te Winkel WWR, et al. Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: a meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educ Psychol. 2009 Oct 28;44(4):227–249. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel J, Van Barneveld A. When is PBL more effective? a meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing pbl to conventional classrooms. Interdiscip J Problem-Based Learn. 2009;3(1):44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Van Der Vleuten CP, et al. Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: hold on to the philosophy. Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):884–889. PubMed PMID: 11555227; eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten M, Struyven K, Dochy F. Student-centred teaching methods: can they optimise students’ approaches to learning in professional higher education? Stud Educ Eval. 2013 Mar;39(1):14–22. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar