1,924
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

Use of student feedback to drive quality improvement (QI) in a preclinical U.S. medical school course

, , ORCID Icon &
Article: 1583968 | Received 28 Jun 2018, Accepted 08 Feb 2019, Published online: 27 Feb 2019

References

  • Association of American Medical Colleges. Length of academic levels distribution in US and Canadian medical schools. AAMC Curriculum Inventory Context. 2017 [cited 2017 Aug 21];4(1). Available from: https://www.aamc.org/download/481048/data/ciic04-6jun2017.pdf
  • Muller JH, Jain S, Loeser H, et al. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ. 2008;42(8):778–4.
  • Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education re-imagined: a call to action. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1407–1410.
  • Goldman E, Schroth WS. Deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):729–734.
  • Fischel JE, Olvet DM, Iuli RJ, et al. Curriculum reform and evolution: innovative content and processes at one US medical school. Med Teach. 2018;11:1–8.
  • Association of American Medical Colleges. Curriculum change in US medical schools: implementation of change. AAMC Curriculum Inventory Context. 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 19];4(1). Available from: https://www.aamc.org/download/481043/data/ciic04-1jan2017.pdf
  • Burke MJ, Bonaminio G, Walling A. Implementing a systematic course/curricular peer review process. Acad Med. 2002;77(9):930–931.
  • Hollander H, Loeser H, Irby D. An anticipatory quality improvement process for curricular reform. Acad Med. 2002;77(9):930.
  • Goldman EF, Swayze SS, Swinehart SE, et al. Effecting curricular change through comprehensive course assessment: using structure and process to change outcomes. Acad Med. 2012;87(3):300–307.