Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Education Online Volume 24, 2019 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,747
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

Promoting innovation in the objective structured teaching examination and feedback: clustering teachers to aid teaching evaluation

Ming-Chen HsiehSchool of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan;Department of Medical Education, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, TaiwanCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2677-7646View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Tsung-Ying ChenSchool of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan;Department of Medical Education, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, TaiwanView further author information
Article: 1620544 | Received 22 Mar 2019, Accepted 10 May 2019, Published online: 11 Jun 2019

References

  • Weinstein DF. Feedback in clinical education: untying the Gordian knot. Acad Med. 2015;90:559–6.
  • Christner JG, Dallaghan GB, Briscoe G, et al. The community preceptor crisis: recruiting and retaining community-based faculty to teach medical students—A shared perspective from the alliance for clinical education. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28:329–336.
  • Wong BM, Holmboe ES. Transforming the academic faculty perspective in graduate medical education to better align educational and clinical outcomes. Acad Med. 2016;91:473–479.
  • Miller JE, Seldin P. Changing practices in faculty evaluation. Academe. 2014;100:35–38.
  • Ebert-May D, Derting TL, Hodder J, et al. What we say is not what we do: effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. BioScience. 2011;61:550–558.
  • Blackmore JA. A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. Int J Educational Manage. 2005;19:218–232.
  • Dillmann R. Teaching and learning of robot tasks via observation of human performance. Rob Auton Syst. 2004;47:109–116.
  • Yiend J, Weller S, Kinchin I. Peer observation of teaching: the interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice. J Further Higher Educ. 2014;38:465–484.
  • Dybowski C, Harendza S. ”Teaching is like nightshifts … ”: a focus group study on the teaching motivations of clinicians. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26:393–400.
  • Steinberg MP, Garrett R. Classroom composition and measured teacher performance: what do teacher observation scores really measure? Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2016;38:293–317.
  • Cornelius-White J. 2007. Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 77:113–143.
  • Flanders NA. Analyzing teaching behavior. MA: Addison-Wesley Reading; 1970.
  • Brophy J. Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Rev Educ Res. 1981;51:5–32.
  • Morrison EH, Boker JR, Hollingshead J, et al. Reliability and validity of an objective structured teaching examination for generalist resident teachers. Acad Med. 2002;77:S29–S32.
  • Julian K, Appelle N, O’Sullivan P, et al. The impact of an objective structured teaching evaluation on faculty teaching skills. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24:3–7.
  • Prislin MD, Fitzpatrick C, Giglio M, et al. Initial experience with a multi-station objective structured teaching skills evaluation. Acad Med. 1998;73:1116–1118.
  • Witten DM, Tibshirani R. A framework for feature selection in clustering. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 2010;105:713–726.
  • Zakharov K. Application of k-means clustering in psychological studies. Quant Methods Psycho. 2016;12:87–100.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.