Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students’ perceptions? A mixed methods study

References

• Mavis BE, Cole BL, Hoppe RB. A survey of student assessment in U.S. Medical Schools: the balance of breadth versus fidelity. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13(2):37–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard RI. How do medical students learn: medical student learning styles and factors that affect these learning styles. Teach Learn Med. 2009;7(4):201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):38–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Durning S. Researching medical education. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Baerheim A, Meland E. Medical students proposing questions for their own written final examination: evaluation of an educational project. Med Educ. 2003;37(8):734–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobby Z, Radhika H, Nandeesha H. Formulation of multiple choice questions as a revision exercise at the end of a teaching module in biochemistry. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2012;40(3):169–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooi ACC, Sommerfeld CS. Medical school 2.0: how we developed a student-generated question bank using small group learning. Med Teach. 2015;37(10):892–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris BHL, Walsh JL, Tayyaba S, et al. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh J, Harris B, Tayyaba S, et al. Student-written single-best answer questions predict performance in finals. Clin Teach. 2016;13:352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby LL. On interpreting the effects of repetition: solving a problem versus remembering a solution. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav. 1978;17(6):649–667.
   Google Scholar
• Foos PW, Mora JJ, Tkacz S. Student study techniques and the generation effect. J Educ Psychol. 1994;86(4):567–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine B, Meister C, Chapman S. Teaching students to generate questions: a review of the intervention studies. Rev Educ Res. 1996;66:181–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendiren S, Dhiman P, Rahul A, et al. Making concepts of medical biochemistry by formulating distractors of multiple choice questions: growing mighty oaks from small acorns. J Contemp Med Educ. 2014;2(2):123–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Anderson O, Wright M. Association between dental student-developed exam questions and learning at higher cognitive levels. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(11):1295–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson SL, Jarstfer MB, Persky AM. Student learning with generated and answered peer-written questions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(2):96–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakurnia A, Nia SR, Aslami M, et al. The effects of question generation activity on students’ learning and perception. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018;6(2):70–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nwosu A, Mason S, Roberts A. The evaluation of a peer-led question-writing task. Clin Teach. 2013;10:151–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papinczak T, Peterson R, Babri AS, et al. Using student-generated questions for student-centered assessment. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2012;37(4):439–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer E, Devitt P. Constructing multiple choice questions as a method for learning. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35(9):604–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittenger AL, Lounsbery JL. Student-generated questions to assess learning in an online orientation to pharmacy course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(5):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottomley S, Denny P. A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using student authored and evaluated multiple-choice questions. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2001;39(5):352–361.
   Google Scholar
• Jobs A, Twesten C, Gobel A, et al. Question-writing as a learning tool for students - outcomes from curricular exams. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong BYL. Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Rev Educ Res. 1985;55:227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson D, Wells J. An inquiry into the effectiveness of student generated MCQs as a method of assessment to improve teaching and learning. Creative Educ. 2013;4(7):117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles (US): Sage publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coderre S, Woloschuk W, McLaughlin K. Twelve tips for blueprinting. Med Teach. 2009;31(4):322–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2007;16(1). DOI:10.1177/1609406917733847
   Google Scholar
• Cobb P. Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind, Cult Act. 1998;5(3):187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger R, Dai W, Osborne E, et al. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra W. How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects. Qual Quant. 1983;17:179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Radley A, Billig M. Accounts of health and illness: dilemmas and representations. Sociol Health Illness. 1996;18(2):220–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple B. A fair trial? Judging quality in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 1998;1(3):205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Schifferdecker KE, Reed VA. Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ. 2009;43:637–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Approaches to qualitative–quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res. 1991;40(2):120–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Principles of mixed methods and multi- method research design. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(2):112–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar