Chinese doctors’ views on workplace-based assessment: trainee and supervisor perspectives of the mini-CEX

References

• National Council of China. Statement on the reform and development of medical education. Beijing; 2017. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/11/content_5209661.htm
   Google Scholar
• Burch VC. The changing landscape of workplace-based assessment. JATT. 2019;20(S2):37–8.
   Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, et al. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(10):795–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, et al. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(6):476–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007 Nov;29(9):855–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701775453. PMID: 18158655
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Workplace based assessment: A guide for implementation. London; 2010. www.gmc-uk.org/Workplace_Based_Assessment. pdf_31300577.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mortaz HS, Jalili M, Masoomi R, et al. The utility of mini-clinical evaluation exercise in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A BEME review: BEME Guide No. 59. Med Teach. 2020;42(2):125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide no. 31. Med Teach. 2007;29(9–10):855–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lörwald AC, Lahner F-M, Nouns ZM, et al. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: a qualitative synthesis. Med Teach. 2018;40(4):414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jonge LP, Timmerman AA, Govaerts MJ, et al. Stakeholder perspectives on workplace-based performance assessment: towards a better understanding of assessor behaviour. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(5):1213–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. London: Routledge; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Massie J, Ali JM. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2016;21(2):455–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipps C. Beyond testing (classic edition): towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Routledge; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis CC, Proctor E, Brownson RC. Measurement issues in dissemination and implementation research. OUP, USA: Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice; 2017. p. 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0014.
   Google Scholar
• Suhoyo Y, Van Hell EA, Kerdijk W, et al. Influence of feedback characteristics on perceived learning value of feedback in clerkships: does culture matter? BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):69.
   Google Scholar
• Sudarso S, Rahayu GR, Suhoyo Y. How does feedback in mini-CEX affect students’ learning response? Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanting SL, Sinnathamby A, Wang D, et al. Conceptualizing workplace based assessment in Singapore: undergraduate Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise experiences of students and teachers. Tzu Chi Med J. 2016;28(3):113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Huang L, Zhu Y. Using Mini-CEX in the assessment of the training for rehabilitation residents. Chin High Health Educ. 2016;1:4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jie G, Shen Y, Jiang Y, et al. Application of mini-CEX in community rotation of general practice residency training. Chin J Gen Pract. 2015;14(11):849–853.
   Google Scholar
• Bindal T, Wall D, Goodyear HM. Trainee doctors’ views on workplace-based assessments: are they just a tick box exercise? Med Teach. 2011;33(11):919–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston PS, Smith CA. The use of mini-CEX in UK foundation training six years following its introduction: lessons still to be learned and the benefit of formal teaching regarding its utility. Med Teach. 2014;36(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt D, Cramer D. Introduction to research methods in psychology (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River: Person/Prentice Hall; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Weller J, Jolly B, Misur M, et al. Mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia training. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(5):633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett S. Workplace participatory practices: conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. J Workplace Learn. 2004;16(6):312–324.
   Google Scholar
• Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: a systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341:c5064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan ZC, Tong CW, Henderson S. Power dynamics in the student-teacher relationship in clinical settings. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;49:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C. The uneasy alliance of assessment and feedback. Pers Med Educ. 2016;5(5):262–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47(6):585–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Contin Educ. 2004;26(2):247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fokkema JP, Teunissen PW, Westerman M, et al. Exploration of perceived effects of innovations in postgraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):271–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts MJ, van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, et al. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2007;12(2):239–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lancet T. Violence against doctors: why China? Why now? What next. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9):S63–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts M, van der Vleuten CP. Validity in work‐based assessment: expanding our horizons. Med Educ. 2013;47(12):1164–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler DR. Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assess Educ. 1998;5(1):77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Rietmeijer CB, Huisman D, Blankenstein AH, et al. Patterns of direct observation and their impact during residency: general practice supervisors’ views. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):981–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan D, Wilkinson TJ, Billett S. Interns’ participation and learning in clinical environments in a New Zealand hospital. Acad Med. 2005;80(3):302–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaife J. Supervision in the mental health professions: a practitioner’s guide. New York: Routledge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Carless D, Salter D, Yang M, et al. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud High Educ. 2011;36(4):395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77(1):81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Post SE, Könings K, et al. “It’s just not the culture”: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(2):153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam TP, Wan XH, Ip MS. Current perspectives on medical education in China. Med Educ. 2006;40(10):940–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A, Gilbert K, Remedios L . Socio-cultural considerations in feedback. 2013. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/monas
   Google Scholar
• Shepard LA. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res. 2000;29(7):4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. A plea for new psychometric models in educational assessment. Med Educ. 2006;40(4):296–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks:: Sage Publications, Inc; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1996;1(1):41–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1316–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wragg A, et al. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ. 2010, 42(4):364–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03010.x
   Google Scholar
• Century J, Cassata A. Implementation research: finding common ground on what, how, why, where, and who. Rev Res Educ. 2016;40(1):169–215.
   Google Scholar