Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges

References

• Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H. COVID-19 and medical education. Vol. 20, The lancet infectious diseases. New York: Elsevier Ltd; 2020. p. 777–10.
   Google Scholar
• Taha MH, Abdalla ME, Wadi M, et al. Curriculum delivery in medical education during an emergency: a guide based on the responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.  UK: MedEdPublish; 2020 Apr. Vol. 9. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerasinghe IS, Fernando RL. Students' satisfaction in higher education. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017 May 28;5(5):533-9.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger DU, Inan FA, Wasilik O. Development and validation of the online instructor satisfaction measure (OISM). J Educ Technol Soc. 2014;17(2):183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond VA, Wambach K, Connors HR, et al. Evaluation of student satisfaction: determining the impact of a web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. Am J Distance Educ. 2002;16(3):169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk G, Karamete A, Çetin G. The relationship between pre-service teachers’ cognitive flexibility levels and techno-pedagogical education competencies. Int J Contemp Educ Res. 2020;7(1):40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wei H-C, Chou C. Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter? Distance Educ. 2020;41(1):48–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazoe T, Anderson T The interaction equivalency theorem. 2010;
   Google Scholar
• Tian SW, Yu AY, Vogel D, et al. The impact of online social networking on learning: a social integration perspective. Int J Netw Virtual Organ. 2011;8(3–4):264–280.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer KA. Student engagement in online learning: what works and why. ASHE High Educ Rep. 2014;40(6):1–114.
   Google Scholar
• Croxton RA. The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. J Online Learn Teach. 2014;10(2):314.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Rey P, Barbera E, Fernández-Navarro F. Measuring teachers and learners’ perceptions of the quality of their online learning experience. Distance Educ. 2016;37(2):146–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurucay M, Inan FA. Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Comput Educ. 2017;115:20–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienties B, Toetenel L. The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: a cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Comput Human Behav. 2016;60:333–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman B, Konstantopoulos S, Kubitskey BW, et al. Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education. 2013;64(5):426–438. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latip MSA, Newaz FT, Ramasamy R. Students’ perception of lecturers’ competency and the effect on institution loyalty: the mediating role of students’ satisfaction. Asian J Univ Educ. 2020;16(2):183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Cheon SH, Reeve J, Vansteenkiste M. When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: benefits to teachers and their students. Teach Teach Educ. 2020;90:103004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger DU. Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-learning. 2004;3(1):61-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger DU, Wasilik O. Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Educ. 2009;30(1):103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz A. The factors affecting techno-pedagogical competencies and critical thinking skills of preservice mathematics teachers. MOJES Malaysian Online J Educ Sci. 2018;5(2):66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey HL, Parahoo S, Santally M. Should gender differences be considered when assessing student satisfaction in the online learning environment for millennials? High Educ Q. 2017;71(2):141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Bolliger DU. Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learn J. 2018;22(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Google Scholar
• Cahapay MB. Rethinking education in the new normal post-COVID-19 era: a curriculum studies perspective. Aquademia. 2020;4(2). ep20018.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Samarraie H, Teng BK, Alzahrani AI, et al. E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Stud High Educ. 2018;43(11):2003–2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tratnik A, Urh M, Jereb E. Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face business English course in a higher education context. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2019;56(1):36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh S, Rao YK, Nagaraja H, Woolley T, Alele FO, Malau-Aduli BS. Factors influencing medical students’ experiences and satisfaction with blended integrated E-learning. Medical Principles and Practice. 2020;29(4):396-402.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger DU, Halupa C. Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Educ. 2012;33(1):81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerinou M Teacher vs. student satisfaction with online learning experiences based on personality type. etpe.eu. 2010;
   Google Scholar
• Clarke V, Braun V Thematic analysis. In: Encyclopedia of critical psychology, Edited by editor is Lisa M. Given. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 1947–1952.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Given LM. The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. New York: Sage publications; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YS. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Inf Manag. 2003;41(1):75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingo NP, Peters GB, Ivankova NV, et al. Benefits and challenges of teaching nursing online: exploring perspectives of different stakeholders. J Nurs Educ. 2016;55(8):433–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll A, Jicha K, Hunt AN, et al. Can online courses deliver in-class results?: a comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teach Sociol. 2012;40(4):312–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garratt-Reed D, Roberts LD, Heritage B. Grades, student satisfaction and retention in online and face-to-face introductory psychology units: a test of equivalency theory. Front Psychol. 2016;7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates R, Khasawneh S. Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Comput Human Behav. 2007;23(1):175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan C, Mahmoud I, Elshami W, et al. Knowledge, anxiety, fear, and psychological distress about COVID-19 among university students in the United Arab Emirates. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;11:582189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingo NP, Ivankova NV, Moss JA. Faculty perceptions about teaching online: exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning J. 2017;21(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
   Google Scholar
• Roberts DH, Newman LR, Schwartzstein RM. Twelve tips for facilitating Millennials’ learning. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):274–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole AW, Lennon L, Weber NL. Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interact Learn Environ. 2019;1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593
   Google Scholar
• Landrum B, Bannister J, Garza G, et al. A class of one: students’ satisfaction with online learning. J Educ Bus. 2020:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, et al. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(2):255–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish LA, Snodgrass CR. Business student perceptions of online versus face-to-face education: Student characteristics. Business Education Innovation Journal. 2015;7(2):83-96.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Zahrani AM. Faculty satisfaction with online teaching in Saudi Arabia’s higher education institutions. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2015 Apr;12(4):17-28.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Fraihat D, Joy M, Masa’deh R, et al. Evaluating E-learning systems success: an empirical study. Comput Human Behav. 2020;102:67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerLinden K. Blended Learning as Transformational Institutional Learning. New Dir High Educ. 2014;2014(165):75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng S, Wisniewski P, Rosson MB, et al. Ask the instructors: motivations and challenges of teaching massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. 2016. San Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Badia, A., Garcia, C., & Meneses, J. (2019). Emotions in response to teaching online: Exploring the factors influencing teachers in a fully online university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(4), 446-457.
   Google Scholar
• Shah DT, Williams VN, Thorndyke LE, et al. Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens. Acad Med. 2018;93(7):979–984. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke NN, Gross A, Moran A, et al. Institutional factors associated with burnout among assistant professors. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(1):61–70. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Popta E, Kral M, Camp G, et al. Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review. 2017;20:24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JH, Tennyson RD, Hsia TL. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Comput Educ. 2010;55(1):155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Wang C, Sadaf A. Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. Internet High Educ. 2018;37:52–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham L, Limbu YB, Bui TK, et al. Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2019;16(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
   Google Scholar
• Cidral WA, Oliveira T, Di Felice M, et al. E-learning success determinants: brazilian empirical study. Comput Educ. 2018;122:273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis CJ. The seven principles of online learning: feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Res Learn Technol. 2020;28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2319
   Google Scholar
• Elshami W, Abdalla ME. Diagnostic radiography students’ perceptions of formative peer assessment within a radiographic technique module. Radiography. 2017;23:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshami W, Abuzaid M, Abdalla ME. Radiography students’ perceptions of Peer assisted learning. Radiography. 2020 May;26(2):e109–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon K, Park SJ, Shin S, et al. Effects of different types of instructor comments in online discussions. Distance Educ. 2019;40(2):226–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis CC, Abdul-Hamid H. Implementing effective online teaching practices: voices of exemplary faculty. Innov High Educ. 2006;31(2):83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Gedik N, Kiraz E, Ozden MY. Design of a blended learning environment: considerations and implementation issues. Australas J Educ Technol. 2013;29(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6
   Google Scholar