References
- Kusminsky RE. Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:681–10.
- American college of physicians: about medical procedures required during residency training. [cited 2020 Nov 5]. Available from: https://www.acponline.org/about-acp/about-internal-medicine/career-paths/residency-career-counseling/preparing-for-internal-medicine-board-certification/the-board-certification-process/about-medical-procedures-required-during-residency-training
- Sherertz RJ, Ely EW, Westbrook DM, et al. Education of physicians-in-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:641–648.
- Martin M, Scalabrini B, Rioux A, et al. Training fourth-year medical students in critical invasive skills improves subsequent patient safety. Am Surg. 2003;69:437–440.
- Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Ault B. The use of tissue models for vascular access training. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:514–517.
- Britt RC, Novosel TJ, Britt LD, et al. The impact of central line simulation before the ICU experience. Am J Surg. 2009;197:533–536.
- Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, et al. Use of simulation-based education to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1420–1423.
- Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, et al. Use of simulation-based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:397–403.
- Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2697–2701.
- Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Potts S, et al. Dissemination of a simulation-based mastery learning intervention reduces central line-associated bloodstream infections. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:749–756.
- Page J, Tremblay M, Nicholas C, et al. Reducing oncology unit central line-associated bloodstream infections: initial results of a simulation-based educational intervention. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:e83–87.
- Sacks CA, Alba GA, Miloslavsky EM. The evolution of procedural competency in internal medicine training. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1713–1714.
- Soffler MI, Hayes MM, Smith CC. Central venous catheterization training: current perspectives on the role of simulation. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:395–403.
- Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, McGaghie WC, et al. Long-term retention of central venous catheter insertion skills after simulation-based mastery learning. Acad Med. 2010;85:S9–12.
- Laack TA, Dong Y, Goyal DG, et al. Short-term and long-term impact of the central line workshop on resident clinical performance during simulated central line placement. Simul Healthc. 2014;9:228–233.
- Simulab: CentralLineMan. [cited 2020 Nov 5]. Available from: https://www.simulab.com/products/centralineman%C2%AE-system
- Laerdal: laerdal IV torso. [cited 2020 Nov 5] Available from: https://www.laerdal.com/us/doc/217/Laerdal-IV-Torso
- Blue phantom: phantom type - vascular access. [cited 2020 Nov 5]. Available from: http://www.bluephantom.com/category/By-Phantom-Type_Vascular-Access.aspx
- SynDaver: central line training system. [cited 2020 Nov 5]. Available from: https://syndaver.com/product/central-line-training-system/
- Nachshon A, Mitchell JD, Mueller A, et al. Expert evaluation of a chicken tissue-based model for teaching ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017;19:E503.
- Brown RF, Tignanelli C, Grudziak J, et al. A comparison of a homemade central line simulator to commercial models. J Surg Res. 2017;214:203–208.
- Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:251–256.
- Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28. .
- Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double- blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–463. . discussion 463–464
- Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91:146–150.
- Bude RO, Adler RS, Made AE, et al. Tissue-like ultrasound phantom material. J Clin Ultrasound. 1995;23:271–273.
- May BJ, Khoury JK, Winokur RS. Tools for simulation; low budget and no budget. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;22:3–6.
- Madsen EL, Hobson MA, Shi H, et al. Tissue-mimicking agar/gelatin materials for use in heterogeneous elastography phantoms. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:5597–5618.
- Earle M, De Portu G, DeVos E. Agar ultrasound phantoms for low-cost training without refrigeration. Afr J Emerg Med. 2016;6:18–23.
- Sorbi D, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ. A simple phantom for learning EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:580–583.
- Tanious SF, Cline J, Cavin J, et al. Shooting with sound: optimizing an affordable ballistic gelatin recipe in a graded ultrasound phantom education program. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:1011–1018.
- Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Hamstra SJ, et al. Barriers to use of simulation-based education. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:944–950.
- So HY, Chen PP, Wong GKC, et al. Simulation in medical education. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2019;49:52–57.
- Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;228:429–438.
- Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the USA. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–2127.
- Stavrakis A, Ituarte P, Ko C, et al. Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery. 2007;142:887–899.