Training medical students in opioid overdose prevention and response: Comparison of In-Person versus online formats

References

• Goldberg L, Crocombe L. Advances in medical education and practice: role of massive open online courses. Adv Med Educ Pract. Internet]. 2017;Volume 8:603–10. Available from. ;:. https://www.dovepress.com/advances-in-medical-education-and-practice-role-of-massive-open-online-peer-reviewed-article-AMEP
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang B, Coret A, Qureshi A, et al. Online lectures in undergraduate medical education: scoping review. JMIR med educ [Internet]. J Med Internet Res. 2018 cited 2020 Nov 10;4:e11 Available fromhttp://mededu.jmir.org/2018/1/e11/
   Google Scholar
• Hixon E, Buckenmeyer J, Barczyk C, et al. Beyond the early adopters of online instruction: motivating the reluctant majority. Internet High Educ. Internet]. 2012;15:102–107. Available from. (2): https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1096751611000893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orleans M. Cases on critical and qualitative perspectives in online higher education. Cases Crit Qual Perspect Online High Educ IGI Global. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Swan K, Matthews D, Bogle L, et al. Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: a design experiment. Internet High Educ JAI. 2012;15(2):81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland N, Lugassy D, and Fox A, et al. Use of online opioid overdose prevention training for first-year medical students: a comparative analysis of online versus in-person training. subst abus [Internet]. Subst Abus: Taylor & Francis. 2019 cited 2020 Jun 24; Vol. 1: 1–7 Available fromhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1572048
   Google Scholar
• Dumford AD, Miller AL. Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J Comput High Educ. 2018 303 [Internet]. Springer; 2018 [cited 2021 Sep 2];30:452–465. Available from. ;(3):. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebritchi M, Lipschuetz A, Santiague L. Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education. Lit Rev. doi: 101177/0047239516661713 [Internet]. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 2];46:4–29. Available from https://journals.sagepub.com/?casa_token=4M2ARZwjTPcAAAAA%3Avof6HiWG8sFx3jVj8eZ4QJyxqZmPNlEWC8rCx6xJ6r30xDYv4fEVpHClWTFYtWzD5T-ErG_OFkVqdoi/full/https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
   Google Scholar
• Bettinger E, Loeb S. Executive Summary Promises and pitfalls of online education. 2017;
   Google Scholar
• Rajab MH, Gazal AM, Alkattan K. Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus Internet]. 2020; Available from. https://www.cureus.com/articles/30131-challenges-to-online-medical-education-during-the-covid-19-pandemic
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur U, Majumder MAA, Sa B, et al. Challenges and opportunities of preclinical medical education: COVID-19 Crisis and beyond. SN Compr Clin Med. Internet]. 2020;2:1992–1997. Available from. ;(11): http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00528-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon M, Patricio M, Horne L, et al. Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 63. Med Teach Internet]. 2020;42:1202–1215. Available from. (11):https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1807484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S-w, A B, A W, T S AE. Adapting to a new reality: COVID-19 coronavirus and online education in the health professions. rural remote health [Internet]. James Cook University. 2020;cited 2021 Sep 2Vol. 20:6000 Available fromhttps://europepmc.org/article/med/32456441
   Google Scholar
• Moses TEH, Moreno JL, Greenwald MK, et al.Developing and validating an opioid overdose prevention and response curriculum for undergraduate medical education.Subst Abus.Internet]. 2021;1–10. Available from;.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1941515
   Google Scholar
• Williams AV, Strang J, Marsden J. Development of Opioid Overdose Knowledge (OOKS) and Attitudes (OOAS) Scales for take-home naloxone training evaluation. Drug Alcohol Depend [Internet] Elsevier; 2013 [cited 2017 Jun 6];132:383–386. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871613000562 1-2
   Google Scholar
• Winograd RP, Werner KB, Green L, et al. Concerns that an opioid antidote could “make things worse”: profiles of risk compensation beliefs using the Naloxone-Related Risk Compensation Beliefs (NaRRC-B) scale. Subst Abus [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2020;41:245–251. Available from. (2):.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1616348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses TE, Chammaa M, Ramos R, et al. Incoming medical students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward people with substance use disorders: implications for curricular training. Subst Abus [Internet]. 2020;1–7. Taylor & Francis; ;. Available from. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2020.1843104
   Google Scholar
• Christison GW, Haviland MG, Riggs ML. The medical condition regard scale: measuring reactions to diagnoses. Acad Med. Internet]. 2002;77. Available from. ;(3):257–262. https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2002/03000/The_Medical_Condition_Regard_Scale__Measuring.17.aspx
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelan P, Osborn A, Palmer E. The flipped classroom: a meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educ Res Rev. 2020;30:100314. Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Phillips WR, and Pinsky L, et al. A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: a review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Med Educ [Internet]. Hoboken, New Jersey.: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2006;cited 2021 Sep 5Vol. 40:867–876 Available fromhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02544.x
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut L, Ceuppens S, De Loof H, et al. Integrated STEM education: a systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. Eur J STEM Educ. 2018. Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 5];3:2.Available from ;:.
   Google Scholar
• Martin F, Ritzhaupt A, Kumar S, et al. Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. Internet High Educ JAI. 2019;42:34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonem EM, Fedesco HN, Zissimopoulos AN. What you do is less important than how you do it: the effects of learning environment on student outcomes. Learn Environ Res. 2019 231 [Internet]. Springer; 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 5];23:27–44. Available from. ;(1):. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09289-8
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield BJ, Tetrault JM, Wilkins KM, et al. Opioid overdose prevention education for medical students: adopting harm reduction into mandatory clerkship curricula. Subst Abus [Internet] Routledge; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 19]; Available from; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1621241
   Google Scholar
• Antman KH, Berman HA, Flotte TR, et al. Developing core competencies for the prevention and management of prescription drug misuse: a medical education collaboration in massachusetts. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1348–1351. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery J, Knoepflmacher D, Mauer E, et al. Improvement in residents’ attitudes toward individuals with substance use disorders following an online training module on stigma. HSS J ® [Internet]. Springer New York LLC. 2019 cited 2020 Sep 24; Vol. 15: 31–36 Available fromhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30863230/
   Google Scholar
• Waskel EN, Antonio SC, Irio G, et al. The impact of medical school education on the opioid overdose crisis with concurrent training in naloxone administration and MAT. J Addict Dis [Internet]. Routledge; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 19];38:380–383. Available from. ;(3):. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2020.1762030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. Matriculating Student Questionnaire [Internet]. 2019 Dec. Available from: www.aamc.org/data/msq.
   Google Scholar
• Berland N, Fox A, Tofighi B, et al. Opioid overdose prevention training with naloxone, an adjunct to basic life support training for first-year medical students. Subst Abus [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2017 [cited 2018 Jul 16];38:123–128. Available from. ;(2):. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2016.1275925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses TEH, Chammaa M, Moreno JL, et al. Opioid overdose prevention and response training for first year medical students: are improvements maintained after a year? In: 31st Annual AAAP 2020 Conference Issue Symposium II. Am J Addict [Internet]. 2021;30:235–236. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.13175
   Google Scholar
• Hargraves D, White CC, Mauger MR, et al. Evaluation of an interprofessional naloxone didactic and skills session with medical residents and physician assistant learners. pharm pract (granada) [Internet]. Grupo de Investigacion en Atencion Farmaceutica; 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 19];17:1591. Available fromhttp://: https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2019.3.1591
   Google Scholar
• Adnan MK. Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: students’ Perspectives. Online Submiss [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 2];2:45–51. Available from: http://www.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbut AR. Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0892364720181509265 [Internet]. Routledge; 2018 [cited 2021 Sep 2];32:248–266. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1509265
   Google Scholar
• Xerri MJ, Radford K, Shacklock K. Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. High Educ 2017 754 [Internet]. Springer. 2017;cited 2021 Sep 5Vol. 75:589–605 Available fromhttps://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0162–9
   Google Scholar
• Zilvinskis J, Masseria AA, Pike GR. Student engagement and student learning: examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised national survey of student engagement. Res High Educ. 2017 588 [Internet]. Springer; 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 5];58:880–903. Available from. ;(8):. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9450–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell DA, Chapman L, Czajka CD, et al. Instructional utility and learning efficacy of common active learning strategies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/17-2491 [Internet]. National Association of Geoscience Teachers; 2018 [cited 2021 Sep 5];65:604–625. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.5408/17–249.1
   Google Scholar