3,277
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

A systematic review of online education initiatives to develop students remote caring skills and practices

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & show all
Article: 2088049 | Received 28 Mar 2022, Accepted 06 Jun 2022, Published online: 12 Jun 2022

References

  • Watson J, Foster R. The attending nurse caring Model ®: integrating theory, evidence and advanced caring-healing therapeutics for transforming professional practice. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(3):360–11.
  • Dewart G, Corcoran L, Thirsk L, et al. Nursing education in a pandemic: academic challenges in response to COVID-19. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;92:104471.
  • Future Skills Center. (2020). Co-operative education and work-integrated learning Canada. Accessed 2020 Dec 18. https://www.cewilcanada.ca
  • Roskvist R, Eggleton K, Goodyear-Smith F. Provision of E-Learning programmes to replace undergraduate medical students’ clinical general practice attachments during COVID-19 stand-down. Educ Primary Care. 2020;31(4):247–254.
  • Van Nuland S, Mandzuk D, Tucker Petrick K, et al. COVID-19 and its effects on teacher education in Ontario: a complex adaptive systems perspective. J Educ Teach. 2020;46(4):442–451.
  • Spencer JA. Electronic documentation and the caring nurse-patient relationship. Int J Human Caring. 2010;14(2):29–34.
  • Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research.
  • Page M, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372:n71.
  • Nowell L, Lorenzetti D, Jacobsen M, et al. Translating caring competencies to remote working environments: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e048459.
  • Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1). DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  • Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(12):1736–1743.
  • Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):29–45.
  • Crandell JL, Voils CI, Chang Y, et al. Bayesian data augmentation methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research findings. Qual Quantity. 2011;45(3):653–669.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
  • Nowell L, Norris J, White D, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13 doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE. 1985.
  • Jang S, Chen K. From PCK to TPACK: developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. J Sci Educ Technol. 2010;19(6):553–564.
  • Luo T, Murray A, Crompton H. Designing authentic learning activities to train pre-service teachers about teaching online. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2017;18(7). DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3037
  • Rutledge C, Hawkins EJ, Bordelon M, et al. Telehealth education: an interprofessional online immersion experience in response to COVID-19. J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(10):570–576.
  • Chittleborough G. Learning how to teach chemistry with technology: pre-service teachers’ experiences with integrating technology into their learning and teaching. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2014;25(4):373–393.
  • Afonso N, Kelekar A, Alangaden A. I have a cough”: an interactive virtual respiratory case-based module. MedEdPORTAL. 2020. DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11058
  • Abraham HN, Opara IN, Dwaihy RL, et al. Engaging third-year medical students on their internal medicine clerkship in Telehealth during COVID-19. Cureus. 2020;12(6):e8791.
  • Bautista CA, Huang I, Stebbins M, et al. Development of an interprofessional rotation for pharmacy and medical students to perform Telehealth outreach to vulnerable patients in the COVID-19 pandemic. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(5):694–697.
  • Cannon P, Lumsden L, Wass V. An innovative and authentic way of learning how to consult remotely in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Primary Care. 2021;33(1):53–58.
  • Martinez L, Holley A, Brown S, et al. Addressing the rapidly increasing need for telemedicine education for future physicians. PRiMER. 2020;4:4.
  • Nearing KA, Lum HD, Dang S, et al. National geriatric network rapidly addresses trainee Telehealth needs in response to COVID ‐19. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(9):1907–1912.
  • Sepulveda-Escobar P, Morrison A. Online teaching placement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: challenges and opportunities. Eur J Teach Educ. 2020;43(4):587–607.
  • Forbes D, Khoo E. Voice over distance: a case of podcasting for learning in online teacher education. Distance Educ. 2015;36(3):335–350.
  • Lister M, Vaughn J, Brennan-Cook J, et al. Telehealth and telenursing using simulation for pre-licensure USA students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;29:59–63.
  • Winkelmann Z, Eberman LE. The confidence and abilities to assess a simulated patient using telemedicine. Athletic Training Educ J. 2020;15(2):132–147.
  • Satar HM, Akcan S. Pre-service language teachers’ reflections on the implementation of a blended-learning environment. Turk Online J Qual Inq. 2014;5(3):3.
  • Liu C, Scott KM, Lim RL, et al. EQClinic: a platform for learning communication skills in clinical consultations. Med Educ Online. 2016;21(1):31801.
  • Quinlin L, Clark Graham M, Nikolai C, et al. Development and implementation of an E-visit objective structured clinical examination to evaluate student ability to provide care by telehealth. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020;33(5):359–365.
  • Cantone RE, Palmer R, Dodson LG, et al. Insomnia telemedicine OSCE (TeleOSCE): a simulated standardized patient video-visit case for clerkship students. MedEdPORTAL. 2019. DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10867
  • Love R, Carrington JM. Introducing telehealth skills into the doctor of nursing practice curriculum. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020;33(11):1030–1034.
  • O’Connor EA, Worman T. Designing for interactivity, while scaffolding student entry, within immersive virtual reality environments. J Educ Technol Syst. 2019;47(3):292–317.
  • Woodcock S, Sisco A, Eady M. The learning experience: training teachers using online synchronous environments. J Educ Res Pract. 2015;5(1):1.
  • Tømte C, Enochsson A, Buskqvist U, et al. Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: the TPACK-framework goes online. Comput Educ. 2015;84:26–35.
  • Darnton R, Lopez T, Anil M, et al. Medical students consulting from home: a qualitative evaluation of a tool for maintaining student exposure to patients during lockdown. Med Teach. 2020;43(2):160–167.
  • He Y. Universal design for learning in an online teacher education course: enhancing learners’ confidence to teach online. J Online Learn Teach. 2014;10(2):283–298.
  • Newcomb AB, Duval M, Bachman SL, et al. Building rapport and earning the surgical Patient’s trust in the era of social distancing: teaching patient-centered communication during video conference encounters to medical students. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(1):336–341.
  • Rienits H, Teuss G, Bonney A. Teaching Telehealth consultation skills. Clin Teach. 2016;13(2):119–123.
  • Sartori DJ, Hayes RW, Horlick M, et al. The telehealth OSCE: preparing trainees to use telemedicine as a tool for transitions of care. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(6):764–768.
  • Walker C, Echternacht H, Brophy PD. Model for medical student introductory telemedicine education. Telemed E-Health. 2019;25(8):717–723.
  • Lan Y, Chang K, Chen N. CoCAR: an online synchronous training model for empowering ICT capacity of teachers of Chinese as a foreign language. Aust J Educat Technol. 2012;28(6). DOI:10.14742/ajet.808
  • Estes K, Gilliam E, Knapfel S, et al. Discovering eHealth technology: an innovative interprofessional graduate student learning experience. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:242–246.
  • Goldingay S, Boddy J. Preparing social work graduates for digital practice: ethical pedagogies for effective learning. Aust Social Work. 2017;70(2):209–220.
  • Pullen RL, Silvers CA. Helping students embrace HIT. Nurs Manage. 2018;49(12):17–21.
  • Posey L, Pintz C, Zhou Q, et al. Nurse practitioner student perceptions of face-to-face and Telehealth standardized patient simulations. J Nurs Regul. 2020;10(4):37–44.
  • Aungst TD, Patel R. Integrating digital health into the curriculum—Considerations on the current landscape and future developments. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:1–7.
  • Coman C, Țîru LG, Meseșan-Schmitz L, et al. Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: students’ perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10367.
  • Frick TW. Education systems and technology in 1990, 2020, and beyond. TechTrends. 2020;64(5):693–703.
  • Budakoğlu Iİ, Sayılır MÜ, Kıyak YS, et al. Telemedicine curriculum in undergraduate medical education: a systematic search and review. Health Technol. 2021;11(4):773–781.
  • Fronczek AE, Rouhana NA, Kitchin JM. Enhancing Telehealth education in nursing: applying King’s conceptual framework and theory of goal attainment. Nurs Sci Q. 2017;30(3):209–213.
  • Jonas CE, Durning SJ, Zebrowski C, et al. An interdisciplinary, multi-institution Telehealth course for third-year medical students. Acad Med. 2019;94(6):833–837.
  • Rutledge C, Kott K, Schweickert P, et al. Telehealth and eHealth in nurse practitioner training: current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:399–409.
  • Yaghobian S, Ohannessian R, Mathieu-Fritz A, et al. National survey of telemedicine education and training in medical schools in France. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;26(5):303–308.