References
- American College of Healthcare Executives. (2022). Top issues confronting hospitals in 2021. [Cited 2022 March 3]. https://www.ache.org/learning-center/research/about-the-field/top-issues-confronting-hospitals/top-issues-confronting-hospitals-in-2021. Archived at: http://web.archive.org/web/20220303194646/https://www.ache.org/learning-center/research/about-the-field/top-issues-confronting-hospitals/top-issues-confronting-hospitals-in-2021
- Nobakht S, Shirdel A, Molavi-Taleghani Y, et al. Human resources for health: a narrative review of adequacy and distribution of clinical and nonclinical human resources in hospitals of Iran. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;33 560–15. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2510
- World Health Organization. (2019). Thirteenth General Programme of Work 2019–2023. [Cited 2022 July 6]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/324775/WHO-PRP-18.1-eng.pdf
- European Parliament. Regulation [EU) 2021/522 of the European parliament and of the council of 24 March 2021. Off J Eur Union. 2021. [Cited 2022 July 6]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R0522&from=DE
- Edirippulige S, Brooks P, Carati C, et al. It’s important, but not important enough: eHealth as a curriculum priority in medical education in Australia. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(10):697–702.
- Pinto Dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S, et al. Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(4):1640–1646.
- MacNevin W, Poon E, Skinner TA. Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest. Can Med Educ J. 2021;12(2):e31–e41.
- Avidan A, Weissman C, Zisk-Rony RY. Interest in technology among medical students early in their clinical experience. Int J Med Inform. 2021;153:104512.
- Machleid F, Kaczmarczyk R, Johann D, et al. Perceptions of digital health education among European medical students: mixed methods survey. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e19827.
- Vossen K, Rethans JJ, van Kuijk S, et al. Understanding medical students’ attitudes toward learning ehealth: questionnaire study. JMIR Med Educ. 2020;6(2):e17030.
- Wernhart A, Gahbauer S, Haluza D. eHealth and telemedicine: practices and beliefs among healthcare professionals and medical students at a medical university. PloS one. 2019;14(2):e0213067.
- Jidkov L, Alexander M, Bark P, et al. Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study. BMJ open. 2019;9(3):e025460.
- Walpole S, Taylor P, Banerjee A. Health informatics in UK Medical Education: an online survey of current practice. JRSM Open. 2016;8(1):2054270416682674.
- Pucchio A, Eisenhauer EA, Moraes FY. Medical students need artificial intelligence and machine learning training. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(3):388–389.
- McGregor D, Keep M, Brunner M, et al. Preparing E-health ready graduates: a qualitative focus group study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;239:91–96.
- Pallamparthy S, Basavareddy A. Knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers toward research among medical students: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. Perspect Clin Res. 2019;10(2):73–78.
- Huisman M, Ranschaert E, Parker W, et al. An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(9):7058–7066.
- Behrends M, Paulmann V, Koop C, et al. Interdisciplinary teaching of digital competencies for undergraduate medical students - experiences of a teaching project by medical informatics and medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021;281:891–895.
- Poncette AS, Glauert DL, Mosch L, et al. Undergraduate medical competencies in digital health and curricular module development: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e22161.
- Plackett R, Kassianos AP, Timmis J, et al. Using virtual patients to explore the clinical reasoning skills of medical students: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e24723.
- Quade D. Rank analysis of covariance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62(320):1187–1200.
- European Commission. (2019). EU health policy platform - proposal for a thematic network on digital skills for future-proof doctors (digital doc). [Cited 2021 Nov 11]. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/policies/docs/ev_20191017_co12_en.pdf. Archived at: http://web.archive.org/web/20211111102510/https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/policies/docs/ev_20191017_co12_en.pdf
- European Commission. (2020) Thematic Network Digital Doc: Implementation of Digital Skills for future-proof doctors. [Cited 2021 Nov 11]. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/policies/docs/ev_20200924_ag_en.pdf. Archived at: http://web.archive.org/web/20211111102627/https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/policies/docs/ev_20200924_ag_en.pdf.
- American Medical Association. (2020). Physicians’ motivations and requirements for adopting digital health adoption and attitudinal shifts from 2016 to 2019. [Cited 2021 Oct 29]. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-02/ama-digital-health-study.pdf. Archived at: http://web.archive.org/web/20211029155723/https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-02/ama-digital-health-study.pdf
- Sithole A, Chiyaka E, McCarthy P, et al. Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM programs: successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies. 2017;7(1):46 doi:10.5539/hes.v7n1p46 .
- Unfried A, Faber M, Wiebe E (2014). Gender and student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
- Acatech and Körber-Stiftung (2020). MINT Nachwuchsbarometer 2020. [Cited 2022 Feb 1]. https://www.koerber-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_upload/koerber-stiftung/redaktion/mint_nachwuchsbarometer/pdf/2020/MINT-Nachwuchsbarometer-2020.pdf. Archived at: http://web.archive.org/web/20220201153046/https://www.koerber-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_upload/koerber-stiftung/redaktion/mint_nachwuchsbarometer/pdf/2020/MINT-Nachwuchsbarometer-2020.pdf
- Meskó B, Drobni Z, Bényei É, et al. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. mHealth. 2017;3:38.
- Kolachalama VB, Garg PS. Machine learning and medical education. Npj Digital Med. 2018;1(1):54.
- Deutsches Institut für Vertrauen und Sicherheit im Internet. (2018). DIVSI U25-Studie: euphorie war gestern - Die „Generation Internet“ zwischen Glück und Abhängigkeit. [Cited 2021 Oct11]. https://www.divsi.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/DIVSI-U25-Studie-euphorie.pdf. Archived at: http://web.archive.org/web/20211011015657/https://www.divsi.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/DIVSI-U25-Studie-euphorie.pdf
- Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):231.
- Alami H, Gagnon MP, Wootton R, et al. Exploring factors associated with the uneven utilization of telemedicine in Norway: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):180.
- Vanstone M, Monteiro S, Colvin E, et al. Experienced physician descriptions of intuition in clinical reasoning: a typology. Diagnosis. 2019;6(3):259–268. Berlin, Germany.
- Schalekamp J, Manintveld B (2015). Today’s organizational challenge: From gut feeling to data-driven decision making. Deloitte blog. [Cited 2021 Nov 05]. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/deloitte-analytics/deloitte-nl-data-analytics-todays-organizational-challenge.pdf. Deloitte blog: http://web.archive.org/web/20211105103516/https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/deloitte-analytics/deloitte-nl-data-analytics-todays-organizational-challenge.pdf
- Stolper E, Van de Wiel M, Van Royen P, et al. Gut feelings as a third track in general practitioners’ diagnostic reasoning. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(2):197–203.
- Van den Brink N, Holbrechts B, Brand P, et al. Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study. BMJ open. 2019;9(1):e022724.
- Medicine Stanford. (2020). Stanford Medicine 2020 Health Trend Report: The Rise of Data-Driven Physician. [Cited 2021 Aug 19]. https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/school/documents/Health-Trends-Report/Stanford%20Medicine%20Health%20Trends%20Report%202020.pdf. Archived at: http://web.archive.org/web/20210819121927/https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/school/documents/Health-Trends-Report/Stanford%20Medicine%20Health%20Trends%20Report%202020.pdf
- Varghese J, Röhrig R, Dugas M. GMDS working group “MI-Teaching in Medicine”. Which competencies in medical informatics are required by physicians? An update of the catalog of learning objectives for medical students. GMS Med Inform Biom Epidemiol. 2020;16(1):Doc02.
- Schulmeister R. Vom Mythos der Digital Natives und der Net Generation. BIBB, BWP 3:42–46. URN: urn:nbn:de:0035-bwp-12342-4. 2012.
- Mallinger M, Stefl M (2015). Big data decision making: is there room for intuition in the era of big data? Graziadio Business Report. 18.