Pharmacy students’ perceptions and attitudes toward face-to-face vs. virtual team-based learning (TBL) in the didactic curriculum: A mixed-methods study

References

• Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, et al. Team-based learning: a practical guide: aMEE Guide No. 65. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275–24. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofstad W, Brunner LJ. Team-based learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(4):70. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen RE, Copeland J, Franks AS, et al. Team-based learning in US Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(6):115. DOI:10.5688/ajpe776115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falter RA, Ealey MR, Carroll KA. Evaluation of modified team-based learning activities on student performance on therapeutic assessments. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018; 10(8):1097–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong KY, CWQ N, Tan NCK, et al. Differential effects of team-based learning on clinical reasoning. Clin Teach. 2022; 19(1):17–23. doi: 10.1111/tct.13436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulfa Y, Igarashi Y, Takahata K, et al. A comparison of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on clinical reasoning and classroom engagement: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02881-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almahasees Z, Mohsen K, Amin MO. Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Front Educ. 2021;6. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.638470
   Google Scholar
• Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, et al. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. 2020 [Accessed May 25, 2023];27. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
   Google Scholar
• Means B, Wang H, Wei X, et al. The cost of rapid transition to online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Technol Teach Educ. 2020;28(2):151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, et al. Tracking the Impact of COVID-19 on online learning. Online Learning. 2020;24(2):6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Nicklen P, Keating JL, Paynter S, et al. Remote-online case-based learning: a comparison of remote-online and face-to-face, case-based learning - a randomized controlled trial. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016; 29(3):195–202. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.204213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goñi J, Cortázar C, Alvares D, et al. Is teamwork different online versus face-to-face? A case in engineering education. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10444. Article 24. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin AS, Markowsky S, De Leo J, et al. Using team-based learning to teach a hybrid pharmacokinetics course online and in class. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016; 80(10):171. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8010171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMasi J, Harvan RA, Luca M. Online and in-class team-based learning in undergraduate immunology: a comparative analysis. Med Sci Educator. 2019; 29(4):1193–1199. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00814-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva ECE, Lino-Neto T, Ribeiro E, et al. Going virtual and going wide: comparing team-based learning in-class versus online and across disciplines. Educ Inf Technol. 2022; 27(2):2311–2329. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10683-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horspool A, Lange C. Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: students’ perceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2012;37(1):73–88. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.496532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas da Rocha Cunha M, Amendola F, Fernandez Samperiz MM, et al. Evaluation of student perception of the team-based learning method (APA-TBL): instrument construction and validation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;33:141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarevic B, Bentz D. Student perception of stress in online and face-to-face learning: the exploration of stress determinants. Am J Distance Educ. 2021;35(1):2–15. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2020.1748491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt CA, Raile A, Yu N. Virtually the same? Students’ attitudes and perceptions of the equivalence of online classes versus face-to-face classes. Online Learn J. 2014;10:489–494.
   Google Scholar
• Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, Compton S. A survey of students’ attitudes and perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: favorable views unrelated to grades. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(4):150–155. doi: 10.1002/ase.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation LM, Tweddell S, Rutter P. The applicability of a validated team-based learning student assessment instrument to assess United Kingdom pharmacy students’ attitude toward team-based learning. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:30. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, et al. Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(Suppl 2):461. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J. 2000;320(7226):50–52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava P, Hopwood N. A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(1):76–84. doi: 10.1177/160940690900800107
   Google Scholar
• Taber KS. The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48(6):1273–1296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh J, Jacquemin SJ. A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online versus face-to-face courses. Online Learning. 2015;19(2). DOI:10.24059/olj.v19i2.454
   Google Scholar
• Shawaqfeh MS, Al Bekairy AM, Al-Azayzih A, et al. Pharmacy students attitudes and perceptions of their distance online learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey study. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Jan-Dec;7:2382120520963039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean QY, Ming LC, Wong YY, et al. Online versus classroom learning in pharmacy education: students’ preference and readiness. Pharm Educ. 2020;20(1):19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muflih S, Abuhammad S, Karasneh R, et al. Online education for undergraduate health professional education during the COVID-19 pandemic: attitudes, barriers, and ethical issues. Res Square. Preprint. 2020 [Posted 2020 Jul 16]. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-42336/v1
   Google Scholar
• Beal JL, Weber ZA, Isaacs AN, et al. Pharmacy students’ perceptions and preferences of in-person versus video-recorded evaluations in skills-based courses. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(11):7976. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain A, Chau HV, Bang H, et al. Performance of pharmacy students in a communications course delivered online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Pharm Educ. 2021;85(10):8617. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwa H, Shehata MH, Al-Ansari A, et al. Online, face-to-face, or blended learning? Faculty and medical students’ perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-method study. Front Med. 2022;9:791352. Published 2022 Feb 3. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.791352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed NJ, Alkhawaja FZ, Alrawili AS, et al. Pharmacy students’ perceptions towards online learning. J Pharm Res Int. 2021; 33(2):88–93. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i231151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick KD, Havrda DE, Scott D, et al. Assessing student perceptions of blended and online learning courses in pharmacoeconomics, management, and leadership. Am J Pharm Educ. 2023;87(4):ajpe9001. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bączek M, Zagańczyk-Bączek M, Szpringer M, et al. Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine. 2021;100(7):e24821. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000024821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh S, Rao YK, Nagaraja H, et al. Factors influencing medical students’ experiences and satisfaction with blended integrated E-Learning. Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):396–402. doi: 10.1159/000505210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Bolliger D. Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning. 2018;22(1):205–222. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD. Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet M, Michaelsen L. Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities: group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski S. A theory of online learning as online participation. Comput Educ. 2009; 52(1):78–82. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier LM, Rosen LD, Cheever NA, et al. Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Develop Rev. 2015;35:64–78. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp A, Barkley J, Karpinski A, et al. College students’ multitasking behavior in online versus face-to-face courses. Sage Open. 2019;9(1):215824401882450. doi: 10.1177/2158244018824505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree (“Standards2016”). https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf; Accessed 30 May 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Shawaqfeh MS, Al Bekairy AM, Al-Azayzih A, et al. Pharmacy students perceptions of their distance online learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey study. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:2382120520963039. Published 2020 Oct 6. doi: 10.1177/2382120520963039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Fang X, Han S, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of online and traditional teaching using students’ final performance scores. Online Learn J. 2015;11(1):20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Rodriguez CM, Romero-Medina AJ, De-Marcos L. Students’ profile in online learning environments: a case study. Online Learn J. 2010;6(4):872–881.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson JC, Newby T. The role of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. Am J Distance Educ. 2006;20(1):23–37. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3
   Google Scholar
• Choi HJ, Moon JW. Exploring factors affecting college students’ satisfaction and learning in online courses. J Educ Technol. 2016;44(2):207–229.
   Google Scholar
• Torres A, Raffaghelli JE, Gordillo M. Student engagement in online learning: a comparison of older and younger learners. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2017;18(3):18–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT. Teacher technology change: how knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. J Res Technol Educ. 2010;42(3):255–284. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
   Google Scholar
• Tabata LN, Johnsrud LK. The impact of age, gender, and institution type on faculty members’ use of web-based instruction. Internet Higher Educ. 2008;11(1):26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nistor N, Drăgulescu LM, Wiese I. The influence of age and gender on students’ attitudes towards online collaborative learning and knowledge building. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):1197–1201.
   Google Scholar
• Ke F, Kwak D. Online learning across ethnicity and age: a study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Comput Educ. 2013;61:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almaghaslah D, Ghazwani M, Alsayari A, et al. Pharmacy students’ perceptions towards online learning in a Saudi Pharmacy School. Saudi Pharm J. 2018; 26(5):617–621. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Bolliger DU. Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning. 2018;22(1):205–222. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiltz SR, Wellman B. Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Commun ACM. 1997;40(9):44–49. doi: 10.1145/260750.260764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar