Examining Our Past, Considering Our Future: A Study of Email Reference, 2000–2015

References

• Abels, E. G. (1996). The e-mail reference interview. RQ, 35(3), 345–358.
   Google Scholar
• Arnum, E. (1993). Electronic mail broadens its horizons. Business Communications Review, 23(7), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, I. (2014). Wer fragt was und wann?: Eine qualitative Auswertung der Nutzung digitaler Auskunftsangebote von Hochschulbibliotheken am Beispiel der DigiAuskunft. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 38(3), 492–502. doi:10.1515/bfp-2014-0061
   Google Scholar
• Bushallow-Wilbur, L., DeVinney, G. S., & Whitcomb, F. (1996). Electronic mail reference service: A study. RQ, 35(3), 359–371.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, A. S., & Croxton, R. A. (2012). Information-seeking behavior and reference medium preferences. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(3), 246–262. doi:10.5860/rusq.51n3.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, A. S., & Croxton, R. A. (2014). A usability evaluation of academic virtual reference services. College & Research Libraries, 75(3), 309–361. doi:10.5860/crl13-408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covarrubias, V. G. (2013). A comparison of the questions asked between the chat reference service and the e-mail reference service in an academic library (Master's thesis). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Retrieved from https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/record/uuid:85222506-8340-484c-9db0-a95213fbb56a
   Google Scholar
• Croft, R., & Eichenlaub, N. (2006). E-mail reference in a distributed learning environment: Best practices, user satisfaction, and the reference services continuum. Journal of Library Administration, 45(1–2), 117–147. doi:10.1300/J111v45n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J., Cummings, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2007). User preferences in reference services: Virtual reference and academic libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(1), 81–96. doi:10.1353/pla.2007.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, W., & Pease, B. (2001). Digital reference: A case study of question types in an academic library. Reference Services Review, 29(3), 210–219. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005663
   Google Scholar
• Fennewald, J. (2006). Same questions, different venue. The Reference Librarian, 46(95/96), 21–35. doi:10.1300/J120v46n95_03
   Google Scholar
• Garnsey, B. A., & Powell, R. R. (2000). Electronic mail reference services in the public library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 39(3), 245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatz, L. B., & Hirt, J. B. (2000). Academic and social integration in cyberspace: Students and e-mail. Review of Higher Education, 23(3), 299–318. doi:10.1353/rhe.2000.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield, D., & Robertson, M. (2008). Preference for reference: New options and choices for academic library users. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(1), 44–53. doi:10.5860/rusq.48n1.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, R., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2015). “Ask a Librarian”: Comparing virtual reference services in an Israeli academic library. Library & Information Science Research, 37(2), 139–146. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media & Society, 6(1), 26–36. doi:10.1177/1461444804039906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie, L. (2002). Getting serious online. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED462978
   Google Scholar
• Janes, J., & Silverstein, J. (2003). Question negotiation and the technological environment. D-Lib Magazine. 9(2). doi:10.1045/february2003-janes
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. M. (2004). Online chat reference. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(3), 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiddie, T. J. (2014). Text(ing) in context: The future of workplace communication in the United States. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 65–88. doi:10.1177/2329490613511493
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., & Finn, A. N. (2018). Perceived teacher credibility and students' affect as a function of instructors' use of PowerPoint and email. Communication Education, 67(1), 31–51. doi:10.1080/03634523.2017.1385821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, N. (2001). E-mail reference. The Reference Librarian, 35(74), 55–73. doi:10.1300/J120v35n74_05
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. J. (2004). Do virtual reference librarians dream of digital reference questions?: A qualitative and quantitative analysis of email and chat reference. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 35(2), 95–110. doi:10.1080/00048623.2004.10755262
   Google Scholar
• Leykam, A., & Perkins, C. (2007). Is this the right tool for our library? A look at e-mail virtual reference use patterns. The Reference Librarian, 48(1), 1–17. doi:10.1300/J120v48n99_01
   Google Scholar
• Logan, F. F., & Lewis, K. (2011). Quality control: A necessary good for improving service. The Reference Librarian, 52(3), 218–230. doi:10.1080/02763877.2011.557314
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, S. E. (2003). Ask-A-Librarian: An analysis of an e-mail reference service at a large academic library. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 8(3), 47–61. doi:10.1300/J136v08n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Nolen, D. S., Powers, A. C., Zhang, L., Xu, Y., Cannady, R. E., & Li, J. (2012). Moving beyond assumptions: The use of virtual reference data in an academic library. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 12(1), 23–40. doi:10.1353/pla.2012.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski, L., & Rumbaugh, P. (2010). An international comparison of virtual reference services. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(4), 360–368. doi:10.5860/rusq.49n4.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, T. T., Perry, L. A., & Hosack-Curlin, K. (1998). Internet use by university students: An interdisciplinary study on three campuses. Internet Research, 8(2), 136–141. doi:10.1108/10662249810211593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, C. A., & Bradigan, P. S. (2001). E-mail reference services: Characteristics and effects on overall reference services at an academic health sciences library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 41(2), 170–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., & Rainie, L. (2014). Technology's impact on workers. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/12/30/technologys-impact-on-workers/
   Google Scholar
• Roysdon, C., & Elliott, L. L. (1988). Electronic integration of library services through a campuswide network. RQ, 28(1), 82–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling-Eccles, K., & Harzbecker, J. J. (1998). The use of electronic mail at the reference desk: Impact of a computer-mediated communication technology on librarian-client interactions. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 17(4), 17–27. doi:10.1300/J115v17n04_02
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz, J. (2003). Toward a typology of e-mail reference questions. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 8(3), 1–15. doi:10.1300/J136v08n03_01
   Google Scholar
• Shachaf, P., Meho, L. I., & Hara, N. (2007). Cross-cultural analysis of e-mail reference. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 243–253. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shachaf, P., & Snyder, M. (2007). The relationship between cultural diversity and user needs in virtual reference services. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(3), 361–367. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan, B. (2006). Twenty years of virtual reference. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(2), 91–95. doi:10.1300/J136v11n02_06
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, K. (2009). Promoting library reference services to first-year undergraduate students: What works? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(4), 362–371. doi:10.5860/rusq.48n4.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. (2004). Characteristics of e-mail reference services in selected public libraries, Victoria, Australia. The Reference Librarian, 41(85), 51–80. doi:10.1300/J120v41n85_05
   Google Scholar
• Tallent, E. (2010). Service priorities and balance: Delivering a menu of quality services that reflect users needs and tastes. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 15(2), 81–86. doi:10.1080/10875301003773499
   Google Scholar
• Tomer, L. C. (1994). MIME and electronic reference services. The Reference Librarian, 19(41/42), 347–373. doi:10.1300/J120v19n41_25
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2012 (131st ed.). Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wishnietsky, D. H. (1991). Using electronic mail in an educational setting (Fastback 316). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED333865
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. Q., & Dalal, H. A. (2015). Delivering virtual reference services on the Web: An investigation into the current practice by academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 68–86. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar