References
- Adey, H., & Eastman-Mullins, A. (2017). User engagement analytics case study: How customer behaviour can drive intelligent library decision making. Insights the UKSG Journal, 30(3), 138–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.387
- Aguilar, P., Keating, K., Schadl, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). Reference as outreach: Meeting users where they are. Journal of Library Administration, 51(4), 343–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.556958
- Blizzard, K. (2018). Proactive chat in a discovery service: What users are asking. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 23(3–4), 59–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2019.1643435
- Bourgeois, J. P., & Bealer, R. (2020). Analysis of chat conversations between two semesters after the implementation of new electronic services at an academic health sciences center. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 17(1–2), 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2020.1759475
- Côté, M., Kochkina, S., & Mawhinney, T. (2016). Do you want to chat? Reevaluating organization of virtual reference service at an academic library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(1), 36–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90009882.
- De Groote, S.L., Dorsch, J. L., Collard, S., & Scherrer, C. (2005). Quantifying cooperation: Collaborative digital reference service in the large academic library. College & Research Libraries, 66(5), 436–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.66.5.436
- Dempsey, P. R. (2016). Are you a computer?: Opening exchanges in virtual reference shape the potential for teaching. College & Research Libraries, 77(4), 455–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.4.455
- Dempsey, P. R. (2017). Resource delivery and teaching in live chat reference: Comparing two libraries. College & Research Libraries, 78(7), 898–919. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.7.898
- Dempsey, P. R. (2019). Chat reference referral strategies: Making a connection, or dropping the ball? College & Research Libraries, 80(5), 674–693. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.5.674
- Evelhoch, Z. (2016). Web-scale discovery: Impact on library database web page views and usage. Journal of Web Librarianship, 10(3), 197–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2016.1191048
- Evelhoch, Z. (2018). Where users find the answer: Discovery layers versus databases. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 30(4), 205–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2018.1521092
- Falloon, K. A. (2017). Rolling with PDA and DDA: How academic libraries can use patron-driven and demand-driven acquisition techniques to build library collections with minimal management and budget. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1865&context=charleston. doi:https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316455
- Fan, S. C., Fought, R. L., & Gahn, P. C. (2017). Adding a feature: Can a pop-up chat box enhance virtual reference services? Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(3), 220–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2017.1332143
- Frantz, P., & Westra, B. (2010). Chat widget placement makes all the difference! OLA Quarterly, 16(2), 16–21. http://hdl.handle.net.libproxy.unm.edu/1794/10509. doi:https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1282
- Hendricks, A., & Buchanan, S. (2013). From exhaustion to exhilaration: Assessing librarian job satisfaction with virtual reference. Library Hi Tech, 31(1), 42–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311303921
- Hurley, D. A. (2021). Repeat users of chat reference: An exploratory study. The Reference Librarian, 62(3–4), 264–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2021.1986875
- Kemp, J. H., Ellis, C. L., & Maloney, K. (2015). Standing by to help: Transforming online reference with a proactive chat system. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 764–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.018
- Keyes, K., & Dworak, E. (2017). Staffing chat reference with undergraduate student assistants at an academic library: A standards-based assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(6), 469–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.001
- Koshik, I., & Okazawa, H. (2012). A conversation analytic study of actual and potential problems in communication in library chat reference interactions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 2006–2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22677
- Lewis, K. M., & De Groote, S. L. (2008). Digital reference access points: An analysis of usage. Reference Services Review, 36(2), 194–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320810873057
- Lux, V. J., & Rich, L. (2016). Can student assistants effectively provide chat reference services? Student transcripts vs. librarian transcripts. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 21(3–4), 115–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2016.1248585
- Maloney, K., & Kemp, J.H. (2015). Changes in reference question complexity following the implementation of a proactive chat system: Implications for practice. College & Research Libraries, 76(7), 959–974. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.7.959
- Matteson, M. L., Salamon, J., & Brewster, L. (2011). A systematic review of research on live chat service. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(2), 172–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.51n2.172
- Ngo, L., Hennesy, C., & Knabe, I. (2019). The impact of web-scale discovery on the use of electronic resources. Serials Review, 45(4), 227–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2019.1695343
- Owens, T. M. (2013). Communication, face saving, and anxiety at an academic library’s virtual reference service. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(2), 139–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2013.809043
- Passonneau, S., & Coffey, D. (2011). The role of synchronous virtual reference in teaching and learning: A grounded theory analysis of instant messaging transcripts. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), 276–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-102rl
- Radford, M. L., Radford, G. P., Connaway, L. S., & DeAngelis, J. A. (2011). On virtual face-work: An ethnography of communication approach to a live chat reference interaction. The Library Quarterly, 81(4), 431–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/661654
- Rich, L., & Lux, V. (2018). Reaching additional users with proactive chat. The Reference Librarian, 59(1), 23–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2017.1352556
- Stieve, T., & Wallace, N. (2018). Chatting while you work: Understanding chat reference user needs based on chat reference origin. Reference Services Review, 46(4), 587–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2017-0033
- Trott, B., & Schwartz, H. R. (2014). The application of RUSA standards to the virtual reference interview. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(1), 8–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.54n1.8
- Vogel, J. (2014). Getting their chat’s worth: A study of chat widget placement in academic licensed research databases. https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/masters_papers/d504rp67m.
- Ward, D. (2005). Why users choose chat: A survey of behavior and motivations. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10(1), 29–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J136v10n01_03
- Warner, A., Hurley, D.A., Wheeler, J., & Quinn, T. (2020). Proactive chat in research databases: Inviting new and different questions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(2), 102134–102134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102134
- Warner, A. (2019). Sliding across the database divide with proactive chat help. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2019/proactive-chat/.
- Way, D. (2010). The impact of web-scale discovery on the use of a library collection. Serials Review, 36(4), 214–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2010.07.002
- Welch, J. M. (2007). Click and be counted: A new standard for reference statistics. The Reference Librarian, 47(1), 95–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v47n97_09
- Wells, C. A. (2003). Location, location, location: The importance of placement of the chat request button. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(2), 133–137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20864156.
- Zhang, J., & Mayer, N. (2014). Proactive chat reference: Getting in the users’ space. College & Research Libraries News, 75(4), 202–205. https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9107/10002. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.75.4.9107