Beyond Bibliographies: Examining the Impact of Citation Generators on Undergraduate Education Majors

References

• Borger, J., Ng, J., Anderton, H., Ashdown, G., Auld, M., Blewitt, M., … Naik, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence takes center stage: Exploring the capabilities and implications of ChatGPT and other AI-assisted technologies in scientific research and education. Immunology and Cell Biology, 101(10), 923–935. doi:10.1111/imcb.12689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantú-Ortiz, F. J., Galeano Sánchez, N., Garrido, L., Terashima-Marin, H., & Brena, R. F. (2020). An artificial intelligence educational strategy for digital transformation. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(4), 1195–1209. doi:10.1007/s12008-020-00702-8
   Google Scholar
• Dawe, L., Stevens, J., Hoffman, B., & Quilty, M. (2021). Citation and referencing support at an academic library: Exploring student and faculty perspectives on authority and effectiveness. College & Research Libraries, 82(7), 991. doi:10.5860/crl.82.7.991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, K., & McCann, S. (2018). Everything online is a website: Information format confusion in student citation behaviors. Communications in Information Literacy, 12(2), 150–165. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2018.12.2.6
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. C. (2022). Free online citation generators: Which should undergraduates use with confidence? Voice of Academia, 18(2), 70–92. https://voa.uitm.edu.my/v1/voa-issue/2022-volume-18/issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kent State University. (2023). Citation tools” software and apps. University Libraries. Retrieved from https://libguides.library.kent.edu/citationtools/apps
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs, 5(1), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
   Google Scholar
• Kratochvíl, J. (2017). Comparison of the accuracy of bibliographical references generated for medical citation styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, J. (2024). Gemini vs. ChatGPT: What’s the difference? Zapier. Retrieved from https://zapier.com/blog/gemini-vs-chatgpt/
   Google Scholar
• Mondal, H., Juhi, A., Dhanvijay, A. D., Pinjar, M. J., & Mondal, S. (2023). Free software applications for authors for writing a research paper. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 12(9), 1802–1807. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_418_23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polly, D., Martin, F., & Byker, E. (2022). Examining pre-service and in-service teachers’ perceptions of their readiness to use digital technologies for teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 40(1), 22–55. doi:10.1080/07380569.2022.2121107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proske, A., Wenzel, C., & Queitsch, M. B. (2023). Reference management systems. In O. Kruse (Ed.), Digital writing technologies in higher education. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_14
   Google Scholar
• Purdue University. (2024). Using citation generators responsibly. Purdue Online Writing Lab. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/using_citation_machines_responsibly.html
   Google Scholar
• Rogayan, D. (2024). ChatGPT assists me in my reference list: Exploring the chatbot’s potential as a citation formatting tool. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 1–10. doi:10.1080/10875301.2024.2351021
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Baguia, M. M., Goles, C. E., & Alejandro, I. M. V. (2023). Faculty’s access to information and communication technologies in colleges and universities in Central Visayas, Philippines. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(3), 468–474. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1827
   Google Scholar
• Scheinfeld, L., & Chung, S. (2024). Medline citation tool accuracy: An analysis in two platforms. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 112(2), 133–139. doi:10.5195/jmla.2024.1718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shopovski, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, AI for scientific writing: A literature review. doi:10.20944/preprints202406.0011.v1
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., … Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019). Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2134–2152. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Victoria. (2023, July 14). Using citation generators to help with the research and writing process. Libraries. Retrieved from https://libguides.uvic.ca/citationgenerators
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Li, H., & Sawaengdist, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: Opportunities and challenges in education. Language Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 41–56. doi:10.1515/cercles-2023-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar