Developmental Relations Between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies

References

• Aarnoutse, C., & Kapinga, T. (2006). Begrijpend lezen [Reading comprehension]. Ridderkerk, the Netherlands: Onderwijs Advisering.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X032008010
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404. doi:10.3102/00346543058004375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 77–95). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, T. (1998). A developmental study of the relationship between reading development and the self-system. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 61–74. doi:10.1007/BF03172813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand-Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van den Bos, K. P. (1998). Improving text comprehension strategies in reading and listening settings. Learning and Instruction, 8, 63–81. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1979). Een-Minuut-Test, vorm A en B: Verantwoording en handleiding [One-minute-test, version A and B: Justification and manual]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K. (1999). Ways of reading: How knowledge and use of strategies are related to reading comprehension. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 293–309. doi:10.1348/026151099165285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., Rintamaa, M., & Madden, A. (2010). The impact of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 257–280. doi:10.1037/a0018212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55–73. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.836200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring? Metacognition Learning, 1, 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-9002-5
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433. doi:10.3758/BF03214546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03
   Google Scholar
• Droop, M., van Elsäcker, W., Voeten, M. J. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Long-term effects of strategic reading instruction in the intermediate elementary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 77–102. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.1065528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbro, C., & Buch-Iverson, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 435–452. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320. doi:10.3102/00346543071002279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gruwel, S., & Aarnoutse, C. A. J. (1995). Vragenlijst: Begrijpend lezen en Test: Zoek de fouten [Questionnaire: Reading comprehension and error detection task]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
   Google Scholar
• Hayduck, L. A. (1996). LISREL issues, debates, and strategies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozminsky, E., & Kozminsky, L. (2001). How do general knowledge and reading strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different educational levels? Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 187–204. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00141
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587. doi:10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218–253. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., Espin, C. A., & van den Broek, P. (2014). Making connections: Linking cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29, 17–24. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., … Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 100–111. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249–259. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijselaar, M. M. L., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The effects of updating ability and knowledge of reading strategies on reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 111–117. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: LEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools in 35 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27, 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K. E., & Morris, K. S. (2002). The contribution of reading comprehension ability and meta-cognitive control to the development of studying in adolescence. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 203–216. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00169
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 291–309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Roeschl-Heils, A., Schneider, W., & van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in Grades 7 and 8. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 75–86. doi:10.1007/BF03173605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 107–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00441.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 369–390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaerlaekens, A., Kohnstamm, D., & Lejaegere, M. (1999). Streeflijst woordenschat voor zesjarigen [Vocabulary target list for six-year-olds]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody picture vocabulary test-III-NL. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Harcourt Test Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in Grades 6, 8, and 10. Language Learning, 48, 71–106. doi:10.1111/lang.1998.48.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19, 272–286. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bos, K. P., Lutje Spelberg, H. C., Scheepstra, A. J. M., & de Vries, J. R. (1994). De Klepel: Een test voor de leesvaardigheid van pseudowoorden [The Klepel: A test for the reading skills of pseudowords]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• van Kraayenoord, C. E., Beinicke, A., Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2012). Word identification, metacognitive knowledge, motivation and reading comprehension: An Australian study of grade 3 and 4 pupils. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35, 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2008). Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 293–301. doi:10.1002/acp.1417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L. T. W., & Vermeer, A. R. (1986). Taaltoets allochtone kinderen [Language proficiency test for foreign children]. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Zwijsen.
   Google Scholar
• Wassenburg, S. I., Bos, L. T., de Koning, B. B., & van der Schoot, M. (2015). Effects of an inconsistency-detection training aimed at improving comprehension monitoring in primary school children. Discourse Processes, 52, 463–488. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.10252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar