Learning From Our Mistakes: Improvements in Spelling Lead to Gains in Reading Speed

References

• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, J. S., & Tate, H. (2002). Does a reading lexicon provide orthographic representations for spelling? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 518–543. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedrus Corporation. (2014). SuperLab Pro (5.0). San Pedro, CA. Retrieved from www.superlab.com
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, N. (2008). From reading to spelling and spelling to reading: Transfer goes both ways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 869–878. doi:10.1037/a0012544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 83–103). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Herbert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744. doi:10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, V. M., & Carruthers, J. J. (1998). The relation between reading and spelling in skilled adult readers. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 264–289. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, V. M., & Castles, A. (2001). Unexpectedly poor spelling in university students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 319–350. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0504_02
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Chang, S., Ouellette, G., & Madden, M. (2014). Does poor spelling equate to slow reading? The relationship between reading, spelling, and orthographic quality. Reading and Writing, 27, 1485–1505. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9502-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2009). Double dissociation between reading and spelling deficits. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(5), 359–382. doi:10.1080/10888430903162878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2017). Invented spelling in Kindergarten as a predictor of reading and spelling in Grade 1: A new pathway to literacy, or just the same road, less known? Developmental Psychology, 53, 77–88. doi:10.1037/dev0000179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Vehoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The Lexical Constituency Model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43–59. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Assessment service bulletin number 2: WJ-III technical abstract. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M., Gingras, M., & L’Heureux, L. (2016). Modeling spelling acquisition: The effect of orthographic regularities on silent-letter representations. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 155–162. doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1098650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and self-teaching. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 31–82). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar