Morphological Processing Before and During Children’s Spelling

References

• Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and pen: A new device for studying reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 287–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1.1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Méot, A., Lagarrigue, A., & Roux, S. (2015). Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(7), 1268–1294. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.978877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breadmore, H. L., & Carroll, J. M. (2016). Morphological spelling in spite of phonological deficits: Evidence from children with dyslexia and otitis media. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(6), 1439–1460. doi:10.1017/S0142716416000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H. (2008). The metric matters: Determining the extent of children’s knowledge of morphological spelling regularities. Developmental Science, 11(3), 396–406. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00684.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006a). Getting to the root: Young writers’ sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language, 33(02), 401. doi:10.1017/s0305000906007409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006b). This turnip’s not for turning: Children’s morphological awareness and their use of root morphemes in spelling. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 567–575. doi:10.1348/026151005x50834
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(2), 118–124. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. H., & Dhooge, S. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children’s spelling. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(9), 1055–1069. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116–125. doi:10.1111/jrir.1995.18.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theories, findings and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertand, D., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123(2), 280–292. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(54), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Office of Education; US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Álvarez, C. J., & Vallée, N. (2008). Morphemes also serve as processing units in handwriting production. In M. Baciu (Ed.), Neuropsychology and cognition of language behavioural, neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies of spoken and written language (pp. 87–100). Kerala, India: Research Signpost.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Peereman, R., & Ghimenton, A. (2013). Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: The impact of double letters in writing English words. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 729. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., Spinelli, E., Tremblay, A., Guerassimovitch, H., & Álvarez, C. J. (2012). Processing prefixes and suffixes in handwriting production. Acta Psychologica, 140(3), 187–195. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, E., Alamargot, D., Larocque, D., & Caporossi, G. (2011). Dynamics of the spelling process during a copy task: Effects of regularity and frequency. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 65(3), 141–150. doi:10.1037/a0022538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D., & Perney, J. (1984). Developmental spelling as a predictor of first-grade reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 441–457. doi:10.1086/461375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K. (2009). Form–Meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3665–3674. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, T. (2014). Toward a parallel and cascading model of the writing system: A review of research on writing processes coordination. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 173–194. doi:10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.4
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2008). Pathways to literacy: A study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read. Child Development, 79(4), 899–913. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01166.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., & Deacon, S. H. (2008). The timing and mechanisms of children’s use of morphological information in spelling: A review of evidence from English and French. Cognitive Development, 23(3), 339–359. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quémart, P., & Lambert, E. (2017). The influence of task constraints on morphological processing during written word production. Paper presented at the 10th International Morphological Procesing Conference (MoProc), SISSA, Trieste, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Quémart, P., & Lambert, E. (2018). The influence of the morphological structure of words on the dynamics of handwriting in adults and fourth and sixth grade children. Reading and Writing an Interdisciplinary Journal. doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9762-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashotte, C. A., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sawi, O. M., & Rueckl, J. (2018). Reading and the neurocognitive bases of statistical learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1457681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team, R. 2016. RStudio: Integrated development for R. (Version Version 1.0.136). Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (1998). Why Spelling? The benefits of incorporating spelling into beginning reading instruction. In J. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 289). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (2017). Learning to spell: Phonology and beyond. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(3–4), 83–93. doi:10.1080/02643294.2017.1337630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Cassar, M., & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 1310–1329. doi:10.2307/1131501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10(2–3), 165–191. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar