The Effects of a Paraphrasing and Text Structure Intervention on the Main Idea Generation and Reading Comprehension of Students with Reading Disabilities in Grades 4 and 5

References

• Bakken, J. P., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 300–324. doi:10.1177/002246699703100302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Lambert, W., & Hamlett, C. L. (2012). The cognitive and academic profiles of reading and mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 79–95. doi:10.1177/0022219410393012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2008). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. The Journal of Education, 189(1/2), 107–122. doi:10.1177/0022057409189001-208
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Hendricks, E., Walsh, M. E., Fuchs, L. S., Gilbert, J. K., Zhang Tracy, W., … Peng, P. (2018). Evaluating a multidimensional reading comprehension program and reconsidering the lowly reputation of tests of near-transfer. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(1), 11–23. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R. (2012). Adolescent literacy: Learning and understanding content. The Future of Children, 22(2), 3–15. doi:10.1353/foc.2012.0011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Brown, J. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 609–629. doi:10.1037/edu0000082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Roehling, J. (2018). Identifying and discriminating expository text structures: An experiment with 4th and 5th grade struggling readers. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 2115–2145. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9826-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. (2012). QuickReads. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences. (2017). What works clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 4.0). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_v4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jerome, K. B. (2003). Protecting the planet. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jerome, K. B. (2006). Animals and their adaptations. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Chard, D., Hoppes, M. K., Renouf, K., & Gardill, M. C. (2001). An evaluation of main idea strategy instruction in four commercial reading programs: Implications for students with learning problems. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 17, 53–73. doi:10.1080/105735601455738
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2006). Classifying living things. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc
   Google Scholar
• Kieras, D. (1978). Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 532–554. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L., & Hughes, K. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H. (2004). *Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, L. M. (1982). Awareness of text structure: Effects on children’s recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 581–590. doi:10.2307/747572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. (2008). Strategy use measure. Austin, TX: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121–143. doi:10.3102/00028312021001121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103. doi:10.2307/747349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnane, R., Sawhill, I., & Snow, C. (2012). Literacy challenges for the twenty-first century: Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 22(2), 3–15. doi:10.1353/foc.2012.0013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443–468. doi:10.1080/01690960344000008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289–312. doi:10.1080/10888430701530417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. J., Capin, P., Roberts, G., Miciak, J., Quinn, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2018). Examining the effects of afterschool reading interventions for upper elementary struggling readers. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 131–143. doi: 0741932517750818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N. (2017). Technical summary: Strategy use measure. Austin, TX: The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk.
   Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 369–390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaughn, S. (2018). Summarizing and main idea interventions for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research from 1978 to 2016. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0741932517749940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. A., & Vaughn, S. (in press). Effective practices for teaching content area reading. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1209
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children’s memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399–411. doi:10.2307/747422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Rapp, D., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S., & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938–964. doi:10.3102/0002831211410305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Solís, M., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., & Fletcher, J. M. (2016). Effects from a randomized control trial comparing researcher and school-implemented treatments with fourth graders with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 23–44. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.1126386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Kent, S. C., Schatschneider, C., Haynes, M., … Jones, F. G. (2016). Examining the average and local effects of a standardized treatment for fourth graders with reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 45–66. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.1116032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1989). Transfer effects of instructing poor readers to recognize expository text structure. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 38, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J., Lei, P. W., Lin, Y. C., Johnson, L. A., Spielvogel, J. A., … Cook, M. (2014). Multisite randomized controlled trial examining intelligent tutoring of structure strategy for fifth-grade readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 331–357. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.853333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P. (2012). Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 987–1013. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9263-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 741–760. doi:10.1037/edu0000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P. (2006). Stories, studies, and suggestions about reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 121–142. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P. (2018). Text structure instruction: The research is moving forward. Reading and Writing, 31, 1923–1935. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9909-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Kao, J. C., Pao, L. S., Ordynans, J. G., Atkins, J. G., Cheng, R., & DeBonis, D. (2016). Close analysis of texts with structure (CATS): An intervention to teach reading comprehension to at-risk second graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 1061–1077. doi:10.1037/edu0000117
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Pollini, S., Stafford, K. B., Garcia, A., & Snyder, A. E. (2007). Teaching cause-effect text structure through social studies content to at-risk second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 111–120. doi:10.1177/00222194070400020201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Pollini, S., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Snyder, A. E., Garcia, A., Ordynans, J. G., & Atkins, J. G. (2014). An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 1–17. doi:10.1037/a0033215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar