Predicting Second and Third Graders’ Reading Comprehension Gains: Observing Students’ and Classmates Talk During Literacy Instruction Using COLT

References

• Almasi, J. F., O’Flahavan, J. F., & Arya, P. (2001). A comparative analysis of students and teacher development in more and less proficient discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 96–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Inviting students into the pursuit of meaning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 225–241. doi:10.1023/A:1016671722022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D. N. Y.; Toronto. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., & Rubin, D. (2006). How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 141–169. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F., Kelcey, B., & Berebitsky, D. (2013). Teachers’ support of students’ vocabulary learning during literacy instruction in high poverty elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1360–1391. doi:10.3102/0002831213492844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, H., Walsh, E., Shanahan, T., Gentile, C., Maccarone, A., Waits, T., … Rikoon, S. N.-W., DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2017). An exploration of instructional practices that foster language development and comprehension: Evidence from prekindergarten through grade 3 in title I schools. Retrieved from Washington, DC https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED575194.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. (2001). Patterns of discourse during two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378–411. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L.-J., Kim, I.-H., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahlel, K. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 181–198. doi:10.1023/A:1023429215151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M. (2016). A lattice model of the development of reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 269–274. doi:10.1111/cdep.12200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Day, S. L., Phillips, B., Sparapani, N., Ingebrand, S. W., McLean, L., … Kaschak, M. P. (2016). Reciprocal effects of self-regulation, semantic knowledge, and reading comprehension in early elementary school. Child Development, 87(6), 1813–1824. doi:10.1111/cdev.12570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Ponitz, C. C., Glasney, S., Underwood, P., … Schatschneider, C. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 85–99. doi:10.3102/0013189X09332373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Crowe, E. C., Al Otaiba, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2013). A longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students' reading from first through third grade. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1408–1419. doi:10.1177/0956797612472204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Rice, D. C., Canto, A. I., Southerland, S. A., Underwood, P., Kaya, S., … Morrison, F. J. (2012). Child characteristics by science instruction interactions in second and third grade and their relation to students’ content-area knowledge, vocabulary, and reading skill gains. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 52–75. doi:10.1086/665815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curby, T. W., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Ponitz, C. C. (2009). Teacher–Child interactions and child’s achievement trajectories across kindergarten and first grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 912–925. doi:10.1037/a0016647
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. L., Connor, C. M., & McClelland, M. M. (2015). Children’s behavioral regulation and literacy: The impact of the first grade classroom environment. Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 409–428. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downer, J. T., Booren, L. M., Lima, O. K., Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). The Individualized Classroom Assessment Scoring System (inCLASS): Preliminary reliability and validity of a system for observing preschoolers’ competence in classroom interactions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 107–122. doi:10.1177/0022057409189001-208
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J., Kelcey, B., Berebitsky, D., & Carlisle, J. F. (2016). A study of teachers’ discourse moves that support text-based discussions. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 285–309. doi:10.1086/688896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teachingg. Retrieved from Ann Arbor, MI http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gfenster/teaqual14ss.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gámez, P. B., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). The relation between exposure to sophisticated and complex language and early-adolescent English-only and language minority learners’ vocabulary. Child Development, 83(4), 1316–1331. doi:10.1111/cdev.2012.83.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gámez, P. B., & Lesaux, N. K. (2015). Early-adolescents’ reading comprehension and the stability of the middle school classroom-language environment. Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 447. doi:10.1037/a0038868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Jason, T. D., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., … Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487. doi:10.1086/669616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Miller, B. W., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., … Wu, X. (2011). Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 194–230. doi:10.3102/0002831210371498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. M. (2017). Balancing comprehension and conversation: How elementary teachers manage multiple purposes for text discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 325–337. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, L. M., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Mashburn, A. (2011). Peer effects in preschool classrooms: Is children’s language growth associated with their classmates’ skills. Child Development, 82(6), 1768–1777. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01665.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED540962
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T.T., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED540962
   Google Scholar
• Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding science talk: The role of teachers’ questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.604684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelcey, B., & Carlisle, J. F. (2013). Learning about teachers’ literacy instruction from classroom observations. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 301–317. doi:10.1002/rrq.2013.48.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelcey, B., Dong, N., & Spybrook, J. (2018). Sample size determination in multilevel mediation. Prevention Science, 20(3), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kelcey, B., Hill, H., & McGinn, D. (2014). Approximate measurement invariance in cross-classified rater-mediated assessments. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1469), 1*24. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 125–128. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. F., Crosson, A., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., & Snow, C. E. (2015). Word Generation randomized trial: Discussion mediates the impact of program treatment on academic word learning. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 750–786. doi:10.3102/0002831215579485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (2006). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Iowa City, IA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O., Bryant, D., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MET Project. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from MET Project's three-year study. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from https://k12education.gatesfoundation.org/resource/have-we-identified-effective-teachers-validating-measures-of-effective-teaching-using-random-assignment/
   Google Scholar
• Michener, C. J., Proctor, C. P., & Silverman, R. D. (2018). Features of instructional talk predictive of reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31, 725–756. doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9807-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. doi:10.1037/a0015576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAEP. (2017, January 2010). National assessment of educational progress: The nation’s report card. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
   Google Scholar
• NICHD. (2000). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Reading Panel report: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. 00-4769). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24, 318–335. doi:10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., & Hamre, B. K. (2016). Quality in early education classrooms: definitions, gaps, and systems. The Future of Children, 28(2), 119–137. doi:10.1353/foc.2016.0015
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119. doi:10.3102/0013189x09332374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pituch, K., & Stapleton, L. (2012). Distinguishing between crossand cluster-level mediation processes in the cluster randomized trial1. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 630–670. doi:10.1177/0049124112460380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289–312. doi:10.1080/10888430701530417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. K. (2010). Practice guide: Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade. (NCEE 2010-4038). Washington, DC: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smolkowski, K., & Gunn, B. (2012). Reliability and validity of the Classroom Observations of Student–Teacher Interactions (COSTI) for kindergarten reading instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 316–328. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328, 450–452. doi:10.1126/science.1182597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–391. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriquez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influences of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104, 3–28. doi:10.1086/499740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L., Murphy, P. K., & Firetto, C. M. (2018). How can teachers facilitate productive small-group talk? An integrated taxonomy of teacher discourse moves. The Elementary School Journal, 118(4), 578–609. doi:10.1086/697531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50(244–274), 100–103. doi:10.1159/000106414
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Developing a model of quality talk about literacy text. In M. G. McKeown & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 142–169). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Crosson, A. C., & Resnick, L. B. (2005). Classroom talk for rigorous reading comprehension instruction. Reading Psychology, 26, 27–53. doi:10.1080/02702710490897518
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson-III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar