Comprehension Monitoring during Reading: An Eye-tracking Study with Children Learning English as an Additional Language

References

• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. J. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. Human Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 1065–1086. doi:10.1080/02724980443000476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1984). Children’s effective use of multiple standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 588–597. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer-Crane, C., Fricke, S., Schaefer, B., Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2017). Early literacy and comprehension skills in children learning English as an additional language and monolingual children with language weaknesses. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 771–790. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9699-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne, K., Kelly, J. M., Whiteley, H. E., & Spooner, A. (2009). The comprehension skills of children learning English as an additional language. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(Pt 4), 735–747. doi:10.1348/000709909X422530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgoyne, K., Whiteley, H. E., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2013). The role of background knowledge in text comprehension for children learning English as an additional language. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(2), 132–148. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01493.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., & Daneman, M. (1981). Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: A model based on eye fixations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(2), 137–160. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90357-1
   Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi:10.1177/1529100618772271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., Hussey, E. K., Wochna, K. L., Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., … Wochna, K. L. (2017). Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), 1380–1405. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1186200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Radach, R., Vorstius, C., Day, S. L., Mclean, L., Morrison, F. J., & Mcdonald, C. (2015). Individual differences in fifth graders’ literacy and academic language predict comprehension monitoring development: An eye-movement study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(2), 114–134. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.943905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer, M., Dingshoff, D., de Beer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2011). Do word associations assess word knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(2), 187–204. doi:10.1177/1367006910381189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2013). The role of accessibility of semantic word knowledge in monolingual and bilingual fifth-grade reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(6), 1195–1217. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angiulli, A., Siegel, L. S., & Serra, E. (2001). The development of reading in English and Italian in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 479–507. doi:10.1017/S0142716401004015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cat, C. (2020). Predicting language proficiency in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 279–325. doi:10.1017/S0272263119000597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M. (1959). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, Minnesota, US: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British picture vocabulary scale II. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, S., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2018). Individual differences in children’s pronoun processing during reading: Detection of incongruence is associated with higher reading fluency and more regressions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 173, 250–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halekoh, U., & Højsgaard, S. (2009). A Kenward-Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models – The R package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software, 10(2), 1–24. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i12
   Google Scholar
• Hessel, A. K., & Murphy, V. A. (2019). Understanding how time flies and what it means to be on cloud nine: English as an additional language (EAL) learners’ metaphor comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 46(2), 265–291. doi:10.1017/S0305000918000399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, H. (2016a). Individual differences in L2 parsing and lexical representations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–2. doi:10.1017/S1366728916000821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, H. (2016b). The timing of lexical and syntactic processes in second language sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1253–1280. doi:10.1017/S0142716415000569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346–363. doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. M., Whiteley, H. E., Smith, C. D., & Connors, L. (2003). The developmental progression of comprehension-related skills in children learning EAL. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(1), 141–423. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.261003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Nurminen, A.-M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, 97(1), 31–50. doi:10.1348/000712605X53678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, H. S. S. L., Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., White, S. J., Gathercole, S. E., & Rayner, K. (2008). Children’s and adults’ processing of anomaly and implausibility during reading: Evidence from eye movements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(5), 708–723. doi:10.1080/17470210701400657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2010). Task effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(6), 1561–1566. doi:10.1037/a0020693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., Lehtola, A., & Paattilammi, S. (2015). The influence of a reading task on children’s eye movements during reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 640–656. doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1005623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, R., & Murphy, V. A. (in press). Effects of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension in children with English as an additional language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Keshtiari, N., & Vasishth, S. (2013). Reactivation of antecedents by overt versus null pronouns: Evidence from Persian. Journal of Language Modelling, 1(2), 243–266. doi:10.15398/jlm.v1i2.54
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., & Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 269–281. doi:10.1002/rrq.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., Vorstius, C., & Radach, R. (2018). Does online comprehension monitoring make a unique contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers? Evidence from eye movements. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 367–383. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1457680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (1995). Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high- and low-achieving primary school children’s reading. Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 143–165. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00009-R
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2011). Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(1), 42–73. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Rupp, A. A., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 821–834. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B., & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 9. doi:10.2307/3588095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendry, M. (2014). Investigating the relationship between reading comprehension and semantic skill in children with English as an additional language: A focus on idiom comprehension [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• McKendry, M., & Murphy, V. A. (2011). A comparative study of listening comprehension measures in English as an additional language and native English-speaking primary school children. Evaluation & Research in Education, 24(1), 17–40. doi:10.1080/09500790.2010.531702
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, J., Lytle, S., Palladino, D., Devenpeck, G., & Green, M. (1990). Think-aloud protocol analysis: An investigation of reading comprehension strategies in fourth-and fifth-grade students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8(2), 112–127. doi:10.1177/073428299000800201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. C., Shen, X., Green, M. J., & Hodgson, T. L. (2008). Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the selective reanalysis hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 266–293. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, V. A. (2018). Literacy development in linguistically diverse pupils. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman, & L. Serratrice (Eds..), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (Vol. 54, pp. 315–323). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/btl.128.02gar
   Google Scholar
• Murray, W. S., & Kennedy, A. (1988). Spatial coding in the processing of anaphor by good and poor readers: Evidence from eye movement analyses. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(4), 693–718. doi:10.1080/14640748808402294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Language Development in the Curriculum. (2012). Languages in school. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://www.naldic.org.uk/research-and-information/eal-statistics/lang
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7–9), 657–686. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Vehoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy. (pp. 189–214).  Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241–255. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1290–1301. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (2008). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. Language Testing, 25(2), 211–236. doi:10.1177/0265532207086782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don’t believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1218–1226. doi:10.1177/0956797614531148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. A., & Murphy, V. A. (2015). Measuring productive elements of multi-word phrase vocabulary knowledge among children with English as an additional or only language. Reading and Writing, 28(3), 347–369. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9527-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spätgens, T., & Schoonen, R. (2018). The semantic network, lexical access, and reading comprehension in monolingual and bilingual children: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 225–256. doi:10.1017/S0142716417000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, M., & Wagner, R. K. (2017). The comprehension problems for second-language learners with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(2), 199–217. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SR Research. (2009a). Data viewer [Computer software]. SR Research.
   Google Scholar
• SR Research. (2009b). Experiment builder [Computer software]. SR Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stafura, J. Z., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Integrating word processing with text comprehension. Theories of Reading Development, 9–32. doi:10.1075/swll.15.02sta
   Google Scholar
• Strand, S., & Demie, F. (2005). English language acquisition and educational attainment at the end of primary school. Educational Studies, 31(3), 275–291. doi:10.1080/03055690500236613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S., & Hessel, A. K. (2018). English as an additional language (EAL), proficiency in English and pupil’s educational achievement: An analysis of local authority data. Cambridge, UK: Bell Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Wagner, R. K. (2012). TOWRE 2: Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch, L. J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018a). Online processing of causal relations in beginning first and second language readers. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 59–67. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bosch, L. J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018b). The role of linguistic diversity in the prediction of early reading comprehension: A quantile regression approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1509864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., & Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader-Initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 360–372. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 335–351. doi:10.1002/acp
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1665–1690. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasishth, S. (2014). An introduction to statistical data analysis (Summer 2014) Lecture notes. Shravan Vasishth's Homepage. https://vasishth.github.io
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies Of Reading, 4(4), 313–330. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404
   Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Vasishth, S. (2011). What is the scanpath signature of syntactic reanalysis? Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 109–127. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Vasishth, S. (2012). Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(10), 1–34. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.728232
   Google Scholar
• Vorstius, C., Radach, R., Mayer, M. B., & Lonigan, C. J. (2013). Monitoring local comprehension monitoring in sentence reading. School Psychology Review, 42(2), 191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. F., Kretzschmar, F., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Staub, A. (2017). Comprehension demands modulate re-reading, but not first pass reading behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–37. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1307862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside, K. E., Gooch, D., & Norbury, C. F. (2017). English language proficiency and early school attainment among children learning English as an additional language. Child Development, 88(3), 812–827. doi:10.1111/cdev.12615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, E., Joseph, H. S. S. L., Adelman, J. S., & Nation, K. (2015). Is children’s reading “good enough”? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Schmalhofer, F. (2005). Less skilled comprehenders show sluggish word-to-text integration processes. Written Language and Literacy, 8(2), 233–257. doi:10.1075/wll.8.2.10yan
   Google Scholar
• Yeari, M., van den Broek, P., & Oudega, M. (2015). Processing and memory of central versus peripheral information as a function of reading goals: Evidence from eye-movements. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1071–1097. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9561-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1989). Effects of reading ability on children’s comprehension evaluation and regulation. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21(1), 69–83. doi:10.1080/10862968909547659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., & Elphick, C. S. (2010). A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(1), 3–14. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar