What Reading-Level Match Design Reveals about Specific Reading Disability in a Transparent Orthography and How Much We Can Trust It

References

• Adams, A.-M., & Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 32(2), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3802.403
   Google Scholar
• Amanat, S., Requena, T., & Lopez-Escamez, J. A. (2020). A Systematic Review of Extreme Phenotype Strategies to Search for Rare Variants in Genetic Studies of Complex Disorders. Genes, 11(9), 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11090987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, S., & Faísca, L. (2019). A meta-analytic review of naming-speed deficits in developmental Dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1572758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C., & Small, D. S. (2014). The use of bootstrapping when using propensity‐score matching without replacement: A simulation study. Statistics in Medicine, 33(24), 4306–4319. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman, J. E., Mamen, M., & Ferguson, H. B. (1984). Reading level design: Conceptual and methodological issues in reading research. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., & Leshem, H. (1993). On the interaction between phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It’s a two-way street. Annals of Dyslexia, 43(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2017). Why is it so hard to reach agreement on terminology? The case of developmental language disorder (DLD). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(6), 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, P., & Goswami, U. (1986). Strengths and weaknesses of the reading level design: A comment on Backman, Mamen, and Ferguson. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 101–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Salas, N., Schöffelová, M., Defior, S., Mikulajová, M., Seidlová-Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23(6), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. (1973). Measuring intelligence with the culture fair tests. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language, 2(3–4), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2308(87)90004-0
   Google Scholar
• Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402000073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamanti, V., Goulandris, N., Stuart, M., Campbell, R., & Protopapas, A. (2018). Tracking the effects of dyslexia in reading and spelling development: A longitudinal study of Greek readers. Dyslexia, 24(2), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorofeeva, S., Reshetnikova, V., Serebryakova, M., Goranskaya, D., Akhutina, T., & Dragoy, O. (2019). Assessing the validity of the standardized assessment of reading skills in Russian and verifying the relevance of available normative data. The Russian Journal of Cognitive Science, 6(1), 4–24. https://www.hse.ru/data/2020/02/10/1573192822/DorofeevaetalRJCS2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 5(6), 636–647. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2014). The dyslexia debate. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017824
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of non normality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). IAP. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10429684
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29(3), 336–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90004-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1996). The children’s test of nonword repetition. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. K., Martinez, D., Vieira, A. P. A., & Guo, K. (2021). Is orthographic knowledge a strength or a weakness in individuals with dyslexia? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00220-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1989). The interpretation of studies using the reading level design. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21(4), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968909547687
   Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, R. A., & Meeden, G. (1984). Measuring Skewness and Kurtosis. The Statistician, 33(4), 391. https://doi.org/10.2307/2987742
   Google Scholar
• Gu, C., & Bi, H.-Y. (2020). Auditory processing deficit in individuals with dyslexia: A meta-analysis of mismatch negativity. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 116, 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.06.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (1991). When are reading units larger than the letter? Refinement of the unitization reading model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, J. A., Matyas, T., & Pratt, C. (2006). Meta‐analysis of the nonword reading deficit in specific reading disorder. Dyslexia, 12(3), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, T. P., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(4), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/029)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2003). A new way of assessing spelling and its classroom applications (R. M. Joshi, B. Kaczmarek, & C. K. Leong, Eds.). IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kornev, A. N. (1995). Дислексия и дисграфия у детей [Dyslexia and dysgraphia in children]. St. Petersburg: MiM.
   Google Scholar
• Kornev, A. N., & Ishimova, O. A. (2010). Tests for diagnosing Dyslexia in children. Polytechnic University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mamen, M., Ferguson, H. B., & Backman, J. E. (1986). No difference represents a significant finding: The logic of the reading level design: A response to Bryant and Goswami. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 104–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Petersen, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of development dyslexia. Cognition, 58(2), 157–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00679-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, C., Pan, D. J., & Mohseni, F. (2021). Reading and writing words: A cross-linguistic perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1920595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S.-A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parrila, R., & Protopapas, A. (2017). Dyslexia and word reading problems. Theories of Reading Development, 15, 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.15.19par
   Google Scholar
• Parrila, R., Georgiou, G. K., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2020). Dyslexia in a consistent orthography: Evidence from reading‐level match design. Dyslexia, 26(4), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrila, R., Dudley, D., Song, S., & Georgiou, G. K. (2020). A meta-analysis of reading-level match dyslexia studies in consistent alphabetic orthographies. Annals of Dyslexia, 70(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-019-00187-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, B. F., Santerre-Lemmon, L., Rosenberg, J., MacDonald, B., Boada, R., Friend, A., Leopold, D. R., Samuelsson, S., Byrne, B., Willcutt, E. G., & Olson, R. K. (2012). Individual prediction of dyslexia by single versus multiple deficit models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2011). Phonology is critical in reading: But a phonological deficit is not the only source of low reading skill. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rakhlin, N., Kornilov, S. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2017). Learning to Read Russian. In L. Verhoeven & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 393–415). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316155752.016
   Google Scholar
• Rakhlin, N. V., Mourgues, C., Cardoso-Martins, C., Kornev, A. N., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2019). Orthographic processing is a key predictor of reading fluency in good and poor readers in a transparent orthography. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading-related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: A review and meta-analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 70(3), 339–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00205-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of over reliance on an” outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J. (2008). Specific disorders and broader phenotypes: The case of Dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701508830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2016). Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(5), 498–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: Past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, M., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). The comprehension problems of children with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 366–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317749187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., Gottardo, A., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., Zheng, X., & Jerman, O. (2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 260–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409331958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bergen, E., van der Leij, A., & de Jong, P. F. (2014). The intergenerational multiple deficit model and the case of dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, W., Geudens, A., & van den Bos, K. P. (2010). The nonword-reading deficit of disabled readers: A developmental interpretation. Developmental Psychology, 46(3), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, W., & Geudens, A. (2012). Old and new ways to study characteristics of reading disability: The case of the nonword-reading deficit. Cognitive Psychology, 65(3), 414–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Edwards, A. A., Malkowski, A., Schatschneider, C., Joyner, R. E., Wood, S., & Zirps, F. A. (2019). Combining old and new for better understanding and predicting Dyslexia. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(165), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20289
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Zirps, F. A., Edwards, A. A., Wood, S. G., Joyner, R. E., Becker, B. J., & Beal, B. (2020). The prevalence of dyslexia: A new approach to its estimation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420920377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). WRAT-3: Wide range achievement test administration manual. Wide Range, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Witton, C., Swoboda, K., Shapiro, L. R., & Talcott, J. B. (2020). Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta‐analysis. Dyslexia, 26(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, U. (2014). RAN as a predictor of reading skills, and vice versa: Results from a randomised reading intervention. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-014-0091-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wybrow, D. P., & Hanley, J. R. (2015). Surface developmental dyslexia is as prevalent as phonological dyslexia when appropriate control groups are employed. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.998185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhukova, M., & Grigorenko, E. (2019). Developmental Dyslexia in Russian. In L. Verhoeven, C. Perfetti, & K. Pugh (Eds.), Developmental Dyslexia across languages and writing systems (1st ed., pp. 133–151). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.007
   Google Scholar
• Zoccolotti, P. (2020). The reading level matched design: Limitations and possible alternatives. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(7–8), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2020.1809364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar