To Show or Tell: Improving the Spelling of Rule-Based Words with Explicit or Implicit Practice

References

• Bonset, H. (2010). Spelling in het onderwijs: hoe staat het ermee, en hoe kan het beter? Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 11, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C. A. Perfetti & L. Rieben (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 173–194). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, A., Vonk, W., & van Zwam, M. (2006). Spelling consistency affects reading in young Dutch readers with and without dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 271–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0012-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, M., & Reitsma, P. (2003). Experienced teachers’ expectations about the potential effectiveness of spelling exercises. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, P., Nunes, T., Pretzlik, U., Bell, D., Evans, D., & Olsson, J. (2006). From the laboratory to the classroom. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Improving literacy by teaching morphemes (pp. 65–103). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L., Nunes, T., & Evangelou, M. (2021). Do children use logic to spell logician? Implicit versus explicit teaching of morphological spelling rules. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1231–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamalaun, R., Bosman, A., & Ernestus, M. (2022). Teaching verb spelling through explicit direct instruction. L1-Educational Studies in Language & Literature, 22, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordewener, K. A. H., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction. The case of spelling acquisition. Written Language & Literacy, 18, 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.06cor
   Google Scholar
• Critten, S., Sheriston, L., & Mann, F. (2016). Young children’s spelling representations and spelling strategies. Learning and Instruction, 46, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bree, E., Geelhoed, J., & van den Boer, M. (2018). Overruled!: Implicit cues rather than an orthographic rule determine Dutch children’s vowel spelling. Learning and Instruction, 56, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bree, E., & van den Boer, M. (2021). Wrong place, wrong time: Children’s sensitivity to present tense spelling conventions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(5), 1221–1242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bree, E., van der Ven, S., & van der Maas, H. (2017). The voice of Holland: Allographproduction in written Dutch past tense inflection. Language Learning and Development, 13(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2016.1217777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Schryver, J., Neijt, A., Ghesquière, P., & Ernestus, M. (2013). Zij surfde, maar hij durfte niet. De spellingproblematiek van de zwakke verleden tijd in Nederland en Vlaanderen. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.2.2.01de
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., & Sandra, D. (2002). Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galuschka, K., Görgen, R., Kalmar, J., Haberstroh, S., Schmalz, X., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2020). Effectiveness of spelling interventions for learners with dyslexia: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 55, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1659794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Landerl, K., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., de Jong, P. F., & Parrila, R. (2020). Reading and spelling development across languages varying in orthographic consistency: Do their paths cross? Child Development, 91(2), e266–e279. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: A crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33(3), 621–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005, February). “The impact of handwriting and spelling instruction on the writing and reading performance of at-risk first grade writers”, Paper presented at The Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink-Chorzempa, B. F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Hebert, M. (2011). It is more than just the message: Analysis of presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10962-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27, 1703–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Aitken, A. A., Barkel, A., Houston, J., & Ray, A. (2017). Teaching spelling, writing, and reading for writing: Powerful evidence-based practices. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917697250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hilte, M., & Reitsma, P. (2011). Effects of explicit rules in learning to spell open- and closed-syllable words. Learning and Instruction, 21, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2003). Do beez buzz? rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. Child Development, 74(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, M. J., Verhoeven, L., & Bosman, A. M. T. (2012). Implicit and explicit instruction of spelling rules. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff, A. O., de Bree, E. H., & Buessler, H. A. (2014). Saying t and writing d: The case of alternating plurals. In R. Kager, K. Sebregts, & J. Grijzenhout (Eds.), Where the principles fail : A festschrift for Wim Zonneveld on the occasion of his 64th Birthday. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics. ISBN 978-94-6093-999-0.
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2010). Predicting the growth of early spelling skills: Are there heterogeneous developmental trajectories? Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(6), 485–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neijt, A., & Schreuder, R. (2007). Asymmetrical phoneme–grapheme mapping of coronal plosives in Dutch. Written Language & Literacy, 10(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.10.2.04nei
   Google Scholar
• Notenboom, A., & Reitsma, P. (2007). Spelling Dutch doublets: Children’s learning of a phonological and morphological spelling rule. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430709336556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., & Deacon, S. H. (2008). The timing and mechanisms of children’s use of morphological information in spelling: A review of evidence from French and English. Cognitive Development, 23(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00848.x 2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Mitsi, A., Koustoumbardis, M., Tsitsopoulou, S. M., Leventi, M., & Seitz, A. R. (2017). Incidental orthographic learning during a color detection task. Cognition, 166, 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, H., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Tolvanen, A., & Holopainen, L. (2008). Reading comprehension, word reading and spelling as predictors of school achievement and choice of secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, T., Chamalaun, R., & Ernestus, M. (2018). The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media: A corpus study. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 35, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00008.sch
   Google Scholar
• Singh, D., Wonnacott, E., & Samara, A. (2021). Statistical and explicit learning of graphotactic patterns with no phonological counterpart: Evidence from an artificial lexicon study with 6–7-year-olds and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 121, 104265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobaco, A., Treiman, R., Peereman, R., Borchardt, G., & Pacton, S. (2015). The influence of graphotactic knowledge on adults’ learning of spelling. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 43, 593–604. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0494-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffler, D. J. (2004). An investigation of grade 5 children’s knowledge of the doubling rule in spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(3), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton, S., & Morris, D. (2000). Spelling. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 525–543). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tops, W., Callens, M., Van Cauwenberghe, E., Adriaens, J., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Beyond spelling: The writing skills of students with dyslexia in higher education. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(5), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9387-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (2017). Learning to spell words: Findings, theories, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1296449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1997). Spelling acquisition in English. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 61–80). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Wolter, S. (2018). Phonological and graphotactic influences on spellers’ decisions about consonant doubling. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 46, 614–624. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0793-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ven, S., & de Bree, E. (2019). Variation is the spice of spelling: The effect of implicit cues on Dutch past tense spelling is dependent on age, literacy and task format. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1579217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar