171
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reading Left-To-Right and Right-To-Left Orthographies: Ocular Prevalence, Similarities, Differences and the Reasons for Orthographic Conventions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root–based–morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00177
  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic–hebrew–english-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing, 16(7), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025838029204
  • AlJassmi, M. A., Hermena, E. W., & Paterson, K. B. (2021). Eye movements in Arabic reading. Experimental Arabic Linguistics, 10, 85–108. http://digital.casalini.it/9789027259608
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Dai, B.(2008). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes [computer software manual]. Available from http://lme4.r-forge.rproject.org/
  • Beaumont, J. G. (1982). Studies with verbal stimuli. In J. G. Beaumont (Ed.), Divided visual field studies of cerebral organization (pp. 58–86). Academic Press.
  • Beeman, M. J., Bowden, E. M., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2000). Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language, 71(2), 310–336. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2268
  • Beeman, M., Friedman, R. B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsay, M. B. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26
  • Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. (1983). Human cerebral asymmetry. Prentice Hall.
  • Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047
  • Bucci, M. P., Brémond-Gignac, D., & Kapoula, Z. (2008). Poor binocular coordination of saccades in dyslexic children. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 246(3), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0723-1
  • Burgess, C., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings. Brain and Language, 33(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(88)90056-9
  • Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hénaff, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain A Journal of Neurology, 123(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.2.291
  • Coltheart, M. (1983). The right hemisphere and disorders of reading. In A. W. Young (Ed.), Functions of the right cerebral hemisphere (pp. 171–201). Academic Press London.
  • Cowin, E. L., & Hellige, J. B. (1994). Categorical versus coordinate spatial processing: Effects of blurring and hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.2.156
  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196500
  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119670
  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000115
  • Ellis, A. W., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: A review of the evidence. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.021
  • Ellis, A. W., Jordan, J. L., & Sullivan, C. A. (2006). Unilateral neglect is not unilateral: Evidence for additional neglect of extreme right space. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 42(6), 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70429-5
  • Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., & Ganayim, D. (2004). Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.174
  • Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., Karelitz, T. M., & Simon, A. B. (2019). Speed of reading texts in Arabic and hebrew. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9877-y
  • Fabbro, F., Pesenti, S., Facoetti, A., Bonanomi, M., Libera, L., & Lorusso, M. L. (2001). Callosal transfer in different subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 37(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70558-6
  • Frost, R. (2009). Reading in hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference. In K. Pugh, & P. McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition. Neurobiology and Genetics of Reading and Dyslexia Research and Practice (pp. 235–254). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838006
  • Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of Lexical Organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1293–1326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293
  • Goldberg, E., & Costa, L. D. (1981). Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems. Brain and Language, 14(1), 144–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(81)90072-9
  • Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertand, D., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.003
  • Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
  • Hellige, J. B., & Webster, R. (1979). Right hemisphere superiority for initial stages of letter processing. Neuropsychologia, 17(6), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(79)90040-X
  • Hermena, E. W., Juma, E. J., AlJassmi, M., & Molinaro, N. (2021). Parafoveal processing of orthographic, morphological, and semantic information during reading Arabic: A boundary paradigm investigation. Public Library of Science ONE, 16(8), e0254745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254745
  • Hermena, E. W., & Reichle, E. D. (2020). Insights from the study of Arabic reading. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(10), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12400
  • Holmes, K. J., & Wolff, P. (2012). Does categorical perception in the left hemisphere depend on language? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027289
  • Hooge, I. T., Hessels, R. S., & Nyström, M. (2019). Do pupil-based binocular video eye trackers reliably measure vergence? Vision Research, 156, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.004
  • Hsiao, Y. T. (2017). The visual perception of Chinese orthography: From characters to sentences [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences]. University of Edinburgh.
  • Hsiao, Y. T., Shillcock, R., Obregón, M., Kreiner, H., Roberts, M. A., & McDonald, S. (2018). Differential vergence movements in reading Chinese and English: Greater fixation-initial binocular disparity is advantageous in reading the denser orthography. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1350866
  • Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2009). Language status and hemispheric involvement in reading: Evidence from trilingual Arabic speakers tested in Arabic, hebrew, and English. Neuropsychology, 23(2), 240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014193
  • Jainta, S., Hoormann, J., Kloke, W. B., & Jaschinski, W. (2010). Binocularity during reading fixations: Properties of the minimum fixation disparity. Vision Research, 50(18), 1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.033
  • Jainta, S., Jaschinski, W., & Wilkins, A. J. (2010). Periodic letter strokes within a word affect fixation disparity during reading. Journal of Vision, 10(13), 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.13.2
  • Jordan, T. R., Almabruk, A. A. A., Gadalla, E. A., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Abedipour, L., & Paterson, K. B. (2013). Reading direction and the central perceptual span: Evidence from Arabic and English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0510-4
  • Jordan, T. R., Paterson, K. B., & Almabruk, A. A. A. (2010). Revealing the superior predictability of words in Arabic. Perception, 39(3), 426–428. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6637
  • Khan, A. Z., & Crawford, J. D. (2001). Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vision Research, 41(14), 1743–1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00079-7
  • Kirkby, J. A., Blythe, H. I., Drieghe, D., Benson, V., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0301-2
  • Kommerell, G., Schmitt, C., Kromeier, M., & Bach, M. (2003). Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance. Vision Research, 43(12), 1397–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00121-4
  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.148
  • Kuperman, V., Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (Unpublished manuscript). Information distribution and reading time across writing systems.
  • Lahoud, H., Eviatar, Z., & Kreiner, H. (2023). Eye-movement patterns in skilled Arabic readers: Effects of specific features of Arabic versus universal factors. Reading and Writing, 37(5), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10424-4
  • Lahoud, H. W., Kreiner, H., & Eviatar, Z. (Unpublished manuscript). Bilinguals reading in native language: Comparing eye-movement patterns in Arabic and hebrew.
  • Lallier, M., Abu Mallouh, R., Mohammed, A. M., Khalifa, B., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2018). Does the visual attention span play a role in reading in Arabic? Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1421958
  • Lavidor, M., & Walsh, V. (2004). The nature of foveal representation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(9), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1498
  • Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Li, X., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Hyönä, J. (2016). Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, 147, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.013
  • Liversedge, S. P., White, S. J., Findlay, J. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading. Vision Research, 46(15), 2363–2374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.013
  • Markee, T., Brown, W. S., Moore, L. H., & Theberge, D. C. (1996). Callosal function in dyslexia: Evoked potential interhemispheric transfer time and bilateral field advantage. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649609540661
  • Monaghan, P., & Shillcock, R. (2008). Hemispheric dissociation and dyslexia in a computational model of reading. Brain and Language, 107(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.005
  • Nooteboom, S. G. (1981). Lexical retrieval from fragments of spoken words: Beginnings vs endings. Journal of Phonetics, 9(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31017-4
  • Nuthmann, A., Beveridge, M. E., & Shillcock, R. C. (2014). A binocular moving window technique to study the roles of the two eyes in reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.876480
  • Nuthmann, A., & Kliegl, R. (2009). An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 31–31. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.5.31
  • Obregón, M., & Shillcock, R. (2012). Foveational complexity in single word identification: Contralateral visual pathways are advantaged over ipsilateral pathways. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3279–3283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.009
  • Paterson, K. B., Almabruk, A. A., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., & Jordan, T. R. (2015). Effects of word length on eye movement control: The evidence from Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1443–1450. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0809-4
  • Peleg, O., Manevitz, L., Hazan, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2010). Two hemispheres—two networks: A computational model explaining hemispheric asymmetries while reading ambiguous words. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 59(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-010-9210-1
  • Pettigrew, J. D. (2001). Searching for the switch: Neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations. Brain and Mind, 2(1), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017929617197
  • Porac, C., & Coren, S. (1976). The dominant eye. Psychological Bulletin, 83(5), 880–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.880
  • Raghuram, A., Gowrisankaran, S., Swanson, E., Zurakowski, D., Hunter, D. G., & Waber, D. P. (2018). Frequency of visual deficits in children with developmental dyslexia. JAMA Ophthalmology, 136(10), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2797
  • Rima, S., Kerbyson, G., Jones, E., & Schmid, M. C. (2020). Advantage of detecting visual events in the right hemifield is affected by reading skill. Vision Research, 169, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.03.001
  • Robinson, D. A. (1964). The mechanics of human saccadic eye movement. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 174(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007485
  • Schiff, R., Raveh, M., & Fighel, A. (2012). The development of the Hebrew mental lexicon: When morphological representations become devoid of their meaning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(5), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.571327
  • Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
  • Shillcock, R., Ellison, T. M., & Monaghan, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review, 107(4), 824. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.824
  • Shillcock, R. C., & McDonald, S. A. (2005). Hemispheric division of labour in reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00268.x
  • Shillcock, R., Roberts, M., Kreiner, H., & Obregón, M. (2010). Binocular foveation in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2184–2203. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196694
  • Shimron, J. (2003). Semitic languages: Are they really root-based? In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology (pp. 1–28). John Benjamins.
  • Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., Carlsson, R., Cheung, F., Christensen, G., Clay, R., Craig, M. A., Dalla Rosa, A., Dam, L., Evans, M. H., Flores Cervantes, I., & Yoon, S.… Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many analysts, one data set: Making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
  • Somers, D. C., & Sheremata, S. L. (2013). Attention maps in the brain. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1230
  • Stein, J. F., Richardson, A. J., & Fowler, M. S. (2000). Monocular occlusion can improve binocular control and reading in dyslexics. Brain A Journal of Neurology, 123(1), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.1.164
  • Toosy, A. T., Werring, D. J., Plant, G. T., Bullmore, E. T., Miller, D. H., & Thompson, A. J. (2001). Asymmetrical activation of human visual cortex demonstrated by functional MRI with monocular stimulation. Neuroimage: Reports, 14(3), 632–664. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0851
  • Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007a). Cambridge university versus hebrew university: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 913–918. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194121
  • Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Herve, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houde, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage: Reports, 30(4), 1414–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002
  • Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P. Y., Jobard, G., Petit, L., Crivello, F., Mellet, E., Zago, L., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2011). What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. Neuroimage: Reports, 54(1), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.036
  • Walls, G. L. (1951). A theory of ocular dominance. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 45(4), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1951.01700010395005
  • Weissman, D. H., & Woldorff, M. G. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. Cerebral Cortex, 15(6), 870–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh187
  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
  • Zhu, R., Obregón, M., Kreiner, H., & Shillcock, R. (2021). Small temporal asynchronies between the two eyes in binocular reading: Crosslinguistic data and the implications for ocular prevalence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(7), 3035–3045. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02286-1