The Science of Teaching Reading is Incomplete without the Science of Writing: A Randomized Control Trial of Integrated Teaching of Reading and Writing

References

• Adams, M. A. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel, K., Masterson, J. J., & Hart, P. (2004). Integration of language components in spelling: Instruction that maximizes students’ learning. In E. R. Silliman & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language and literacy learning in schools (pp. 292–315). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1989). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 43(2), 130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–32). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2016). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., Corkill, A. J., Sharp, J. M., Downey, R. G., & Khramtsova, I. (1995). Knowledge, interest, and narrative writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Discourse-level oral language, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K. B., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Rogan, L. W., Brooks, A., Reed, E., & Graham, S. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., Vol. 7, pp. 548–556). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (Eds.). (2007). Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X116768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Kapp, S. (2007). Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental exposure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (Journal of education) (3rd ed. Vol. 189, pp. 107–122). International Reading Association. Reprinted in.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., & Thomas, C. C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2020). The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S35–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Aiken, A. A., Hebert, A., Camping, A., Santagelo, T., Harris, K. R., Eustice, K., Sweet, J. D., & Ng, C. (2021). Do children with reading difficulties experience writing difficulties? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1481–1506. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Bruch, J., Fitzgerald, J., Friedrich, L., Furgeson, J., Greene, K., Kim, J., Lyskawa, J., Olson, C. B., & Smither Wulsin, C. (2016). Teaching secondary students to write effectively. NCEE 2017-4002. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from the NCEE website: http://whatworks.ed.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. A. (2011). It is more than just the message: Presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v44i4.6687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chorzempa, B. F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A carnegie corporation time to act report. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Kim, Y.-S. G., Cao, Y., Lee, J., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H. Q., & Olson, C. B. (2023). A meta-analysis of writing treatments for students in grades 6–12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(7), 1004–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2017). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., Barkel, A., Kavanaugh, C., & Talukdar, J. (2018). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading & Writing, 27(9), 1703–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Camping, A., & McKeown, D. (2023). A review of research on professional development for multicomponent strategy-focused writing instruction: Knowledge gained and challenges remaining. In F. DeSmedt, R. Bouwer, T. Limpo, & S. Graham (Eds.), Conceptualizing, designing, implementing, and evaluating writing interventions (pp. 101–136). Brill Publishing. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004546240/BP000006.xml
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled students’ composition skills: Self-control strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2016). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Policy implications of an evidence-based practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624216
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2018). Self-regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical grounded principles (pp. 119–151). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practice-based professional development and self-regulated strategy development for tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–340. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Kim, Y.-S. G., Yim, S., Camping, A., & Graham, S. (2023). Yes, they can: Developing transcription skills and oral language in tandem with SRSD instruction on close reading of science text to write informative essays at grades 1 and 2. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 102150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & McKeown, D. (2022). Overcoming barriers and paradigm wars: Powerful evidence-based writing instruction. Theory into Practice, 61(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, S. R., Swartz, C. W., Wakely, M. B., de Kruif, R. E. L., & Montgomery, J. W. (2002). Executive functions in elementary school children with and without problems in written expression. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Barbaresi, W. J. (2009). The forgotten learning disability: Epidemiology of written-language disorder in a population-based birth cohort (1976–1982), Rochester, Minnesota. Pediatrics, 123(5), 1306–1313. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2003). The influence of reader’s prior knowledge on text comprehension and learning from text. In R. Nata (Ed.), Progress in Education (Vol. 13, pp. 189–209). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S., Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Puranik, C. (2014). Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 57(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0152)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Sidler, J. F., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning & Individual Differences, 21(5), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S., Al Otaiba, S., Wanzek, J., & Gatlin, B. (2015). Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and the gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking the simple view of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G. (2020). Interactive dynamic literacy model: An integrative theoretical framework for reading and writing relations. In R. Alves, T. Limpo, & M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading-writing connections: Towards integrative literacy science (pp. 11–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G. (2022). Co-occurrence of reading and writing difficulties: The application of the interactive dynamic literacy model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(6), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211060868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., & Graham, S. (2022). Expanding the direct and indirect effects model of writing (DIEW): Dynamic relations of component skills to various writing outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., & Park, S. (2019). Unpacking pathways using the direct and indirect effects model of writing (DIEW) and the contributions of higher order cognitive skills to writing. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(5), 1319–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9913-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., Petscher, Y., Wanzek, J., & Al Otaiba, S. (2018). Relations between reading and writing: A longitudinal examination from grades 3 to 6. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(7), 1591–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9855-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., & Snow, C. E. (2021). The science of reading is incomplete without the science of teaching reading. The Reading League, 2(3), 5–8 & 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., Wolters, A., & Lee, J. (2024). Reading and writing relations are not uniform: They differ by the linguistic grain size, developmental phase, and measurement. Review of Educational Research, 94(3), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231178830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch12
   Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Davison, M. D., Hammer, C. S., Miller, C. A., & Glutting, J. J. (2013). Knowledge, writing, and language outcomes for a reading comprehension and writing intervention. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(7), 1133–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9409-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, D., Brindle, M., Harris, K. R., Sandmel, K., Steinbrecher, T. D., Graham, S., Lane, K. L., & Oakes, W. P. (2019). Teachers’ voices: Perceptions of effective professional development and classwide implementation of self-regulated strategy development in writing. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 753–791. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218804146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(1–2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., Graham, S., & Gillespie, A. (2015). The relationship of discourse and topic knowledge to fifth graders’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Schatschneider, C., Steacy, L. M., Terry, N. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st‐century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(Suppl S1), S267–S282. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., Lombardino, L. J., & Altmann, L. J. P. (2008). Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction. Research-based strategies that all instructors should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2016). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 225–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9335-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. G. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading–writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skar, G. B., Graham, S., & Huebner, A. (2023). The long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s writing: A follow-up replication study. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09729-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, A. B., & Hallinan, M. T. (1986). Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, W. (1986). Creative approaches to sentence combining. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skill & National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of word reading efficiency–second edition. Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (1992). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R. (Eds.). (2007). Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Puranik, C. S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Kantor, E., & Tschinkel, P. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading & Writing, 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Gatlin, B., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017). The impact of transcription writing interventions for first-grade students. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 33(5), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1250142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What works clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
   Google Scholar