5,465
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Staff matter: Gender differences in science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) career interest development in adolescent youth

ORCID Icon, , &

References

  • Adams, J. D., Gupta, P., & Cotumaccio, A. (2014). Long-term participants: A museum program enhances girls’ stem interest, motivation, and persistence. Afterschool Matters, 20, 13–20.
  • Afterschool Alliance. (2013). Defining youth outcomes for STEM learning in afterschool. Retrieved from www.afterschoolalliance.org/STEM_Outcomes_2013.pdf.
  • Afterschool Alliance. (2015). Full STEM ahead: Afterschool programs step up as key partners in STEM education. Retrieved from www.afterschoolalliance.org/AA3 PM/STEM.pdf.
  • Afterschool Alliance. (2016). The impact of afterschool STEM: Examples from the field. Retrieved from www.afterschoolalliance.org/documents/AfterschoolSTEMImpacts2016.pdf.
  • Archer, L., & Francis, B. (2006). Understanding minority ethnic achievement: Race, gender, class and “success”. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582.
  • Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Benson, P. L. (2003). Developmental assets and asset-building communities: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. M. Lerner & P. L. Benson (Eds.), Developmental assets and asset-building communities: Implications for research, policy, and practice (pp. 19–46). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  • Benson, P. L., & Scales, P. C. (2009). The definition and preliminary measurement of thriving in adolescence. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 85–104.
  • Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma, A. (2006). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development. Volume 1 of Handbook of Child Psychology (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Bevan, B., & Michalchik, V. (2013). Where it gets interesting: Competing models of STEM learning after school. Afterschool Matters, 17, 1–8.
  • Bowers, E. P., Li, Y., Kiely, M. K., Brittian, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). The five Cs model of positive youth development: A longitudinal analysis of confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 720–735.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871–889.
  • Canzano, A., Anthony, K. A., & Scott, E. (2016). How developmental theory supports social emotional learning in afterschool programs. The Journal of Expanded Learning Opportunities, 1(3), 7–26.
  • Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98–124. doi:10.1177/0002716203260102
  • Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Chi, B., Freeman, J., & Lee, S. (2008). Science in after-school market research study. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.org/science-after-school-market-research-study-2008.
  • Chinn, P. W. (2006). Preparing science teachers for culturally diverse students: Developing cultural literacy through cultural immersion, cultural translators and communities of practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 367–402.
  • Coalition for Science After-School. (2007). Science in after-school: A blueprint for action. Retrieved from www.informalscience.org/science-after-school-blueprint-action-2007.
  • Cole, S. (2012). The development of science identity: An evaluation of youth development programs at the museum of science and industry, Chicago (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1338&context=luc_diss.
  • Crowley, K., Barron, B. J., Knutson, K., & Martin, C. (2015). Interest and the development of pathways to science. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning and related activity. Washington, DC: AERA.
  • Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 63–79.
  • Dahlgren, C., Noam, G. G., & Larson, J. (2008). Findings for year one data for the informal learning in science afterschool study (ILSA). Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/summerlearning.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/Publications/findings_from_ILSA_yr_1_data.pdf.
  • DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011). High aspirations but low progression: The science aspirations–careers paradox amongst minority ethnic students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 243–271.
  • DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011b). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037–1063.
  • Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Optimizing out‐of‐school time: The role of free‐choice learning. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2003(97), 75–88.
  • Durlak, J. A., Mahoney, J. L., Bohnert, A. M., & Parente, M. E. (2010). Developing and improving after‐school programs to enhance youth’s personal growth and adjustment: A special issue of AJCP. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 285–293.
  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 294–309.
  • Eccles, J. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.
  • Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Feder, M. A., & Jolly, E. (2017). What do we know about STEM in out-of-school settings? STEM Ready America. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315855954_What_Do_We_Know_About_STEM_in_Out-of-School_Settings_A_National_Research_Council_Report.
  • Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1981). TOSRA: Test of science related attitudes handbook. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Australia Council for Educational Research.
  • Freeman, J., Dorph, R., & Chi, B. (2009). Strengthening after school STEM staff development. University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/Strengthening_After-School_STEM_Staff_Development.pdf.
  • Ginwright, S. A. (2007). Black youth activism and the role of critical social capital in Black community organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(3), 403–418. doi:10.1177/0002764207306068
  • Gonsalves, A., Rahm, J., & Carvalho, A. (2013). “We could think of things that could be science”: Girls’ re‐figuring of science in an out‐of‐school‐time club. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1068–1097.
  • Greenberg, M. T., & Lippold, M. A. (2013). Promoting healthy outcomes among youth with multiple risks: Innovative approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 34, 253–270. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-0311811-124619
  • Gupta, P., & Negron, J. (2017). There is no “off button” to explaining: Theorizing identity development in youth who work as floor facilitators. In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators (pp. 153–168). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50398-1_8
  • Ha, M. S., Cha, H. Y., Kim, S. W., & Lee, K. H. (2007). Analysis of social factors affecting gender differences in science-related attitudes. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 27(7), 583–591.
  • Hill, S. (2016). School-age care and OST: A conversation about the OST workforce. Youth Today. Retrieved from https://youthtoday.org/2016/05/school-age-care-and-ost-a-conversation-about-the-ost-workforce/
  • Hirsch, B. J. (2005). A place to call home: After-school programs for urban youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hirsch, B. J., Deutsch, N. L., & DuBois, D. L. (2011). After-school centers and youth development: Case studies of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • House, A. H., LLorente, C., Gorges, T., Lundh, P., & Mata, W. (2015). Science in California’s public afterschool program: Exploring offerings and opportunities. The Journal of Expanded Learning Opportunities, 1(2), 31–39.
  • Jarrett, R. L., Jefferson, S. R., & Kelly, J. N. (2010). Finding community in family: Neighborhood effects and African American kin networks. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(3), 299–328.
  • Jones, G., Taylor, A., & Forrester, J. H. (2011). Developing a scientist: A retrospective look. International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1653–1673.
  • Jones, J. N., & Deutsch, N. L. (2011). Relational strategies in after-school settings how staff–youth relationships support positive development. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1381–1406.
  • Khalili, K. Y. (1987). A crosscultural validation of a test of science related attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(2), 127–136.
  • Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Krishnamurthi, A., Ballard, M., & Noam, G. G. (2014). Examining the impact of afterschool STEM programs. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/ExaminingtheImpactofAfterschoolSTEMPrograms.pdf.
  • Larson, R., Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2004). Features of positive developmental settings. The Prevention Researcher, 11(2), 8–13.
  • Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170–183.
  • Laursen, S. L., Thiry, H., Archie, T., & Crane, R. (2013). Variations on a theme: Characteristics of out-of-school time science programs offered by distinct organization types. Afterschool Matters, 17, 36–49.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  • Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lerner, R. M., Brentano, C., Dowling, E. M., & Anderson, P. M. (2002). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2002(95), 11–34.
  • Lerner, R. M., Dowling, E. M., & Anderson, P. M. (2003). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 172–180.
  • Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., … Smith, L. M. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71.
  • Liang, B. G., Bogat, A., & Duffy, N. (2014). Gender in mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois, & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (2nd ed., pp. 159–175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Liao, C. L., & Sánchez, B. (2016). Mentoring relationship quality profiles and their association with urban, low-income youth’s academic outcomes. Youth & Society. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0044118X16668058.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.
  • Loyd, A. B., & Williams, B. V. (2017). The potential for youth programs to promote African American youth’s development of ethnic and racial identity. Child Development Perspectives, 11(1), 29–38.
  • Mahoney, J. L., Parente, M. E., & Lord, H. (2007). After‐school program engagement: Links to child competence and program quality and content. Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 385–404.
  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685.
  • McClure, P., & Rodriguez, A. (2007). Factors related to advanced course-taking patterns, persistence in STEM, and the role of out-of-school time programs: A literature review. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/2014-06-24_2007_Pathways_to_Advanced_Coursework_Literature_Review.pdf.
  • McCreedy, D., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). Cascading influences. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Science Museum.
  • Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.
  • National Academies Press. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2015). Identifying and supporting productive STEM programs in out-of-school settings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Science Foundation. (2013). Women, minorities and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_digest.pdf.
  • Newell, A. D., Zientek, L. R., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G. L., & Moreno, N. P. (2015). Students’ attitudes toward science as predictors of gains on student content knowledge: Benefits of an after‐school program. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 216–225.
  • Oyserman, D., Gant, L., & Ager, J. (1995). A socially contexualized model of African American identity: Possible selves and school persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1216–1232.
  • Oztok, M., & Arvaja, M. (2016). No one ever steps in the same discussion twice: The relationship between identities and meaning. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/80386/
  • Packard, B. W., & Nguyen, D. (2003). Science career-related possible selves of adolescent girls: A longitudinal study. Journal of Career Development, 29(4), 251–262.
  • Rennie, L. J., Feher, E., Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out‐of‐school settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 112–120.
  • Rhodes, J. E. (2004). The critical ingredient: Caring youth-staff relationships in after-school settings. New Directions for Youth Development, 101, 145–161.
  • Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7(2), 94–111.
  • Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2016). Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 188–202.
  • Roth, W. M. (2007). Toward a dialectical notion and praxis of scientific literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(4), 377–398.
  • Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. H. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96, 411–427. doi:10.1002/sce.21007
  • Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Oesterle, S., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., & Pashak, T. J. (2016). The dimensions of successful young adult development: A conceptual and measurement framework. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 150–174.
  • Shernoff, D. J. (2010). Engagement in after‐school programs as a predictor of social competence and academic performance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 325–337.
  • Smist, J. M., Archambault, F. X., & Owen, S. V. (1994). Gender differences in attitude toward science. Paper presented at the meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
  • Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1144. doi:10.1126/science.1128690
  • Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O’Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM‐related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities‐in‐practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179.
  • Tegtmeier, T. (2009). Science-related attitudes of urban middle school students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 1481599)
  • The After School Corporation. (2010). Science after school: How to design and run great programs. Retrieved from http://www.expandinglearning.org/toolkit/science-after-school-how-design-and-run-great-program-activities
  • Theokas, C., & Lerner, R. M. (2006). Observed ecological assets in families, schools, and neighborhoods: Conceptualization, measurement, and relations with positive and negative developmental outcomes. Applied Developmental Science, 10(2), 61–74.
  • Theokas, C., Almerigi, J. B., Lerner, R. M., Dowling, E. M., Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., & von Eye, A. (2005). Conceptualizing and modeling individual and ecological asset components of thriving in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 113–143.
  • Trost, S. G., Rosenkranz, R. R., & Dzewaltowski, D. (2008). Physical activity levels among children attending after-school programs. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(4), 622.
  • Vandell, D. L., Simzar, R., O’Cadiz, P., & Hall, V. (2016). Findings from an afterschool STEM learning initiative: Links to professional development and quality STEM learning experience. Journal of Expanded Learning Opportunities, 1(3), 27–36.
  • Welch, A. G. (2010). Using the TOSRA to Assess High School Students’ Attitudes toward Science after Competing In the FIRST Robotics Competition: An Exploratory Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(3).
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Williams, J. L., & Deutsch, N. L. (2016). Beyond between-group differences: Considering race, ethnicity, and culture in research on positive youth development programs. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 203–213.
  • Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
  • Wright, G. (2009). 18 Million Children need – but don’t have – afterschool programs, according to new “America after 3 PM” study [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/press_archives/AA3 PM_National_NR_2009.pdf.
  • Young, J. R., Ortiz, N., & Young, J. L. (2017). STEMulating interest: A meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 62–74.